Search
00
GBAF Logo
trophy
Top StoriesInterviewsBusinessFinanceBankingTechnologyInvestingTradingVideosAwardsMagazinesHeadlinesTrends

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest news and updates from our team.

Global Banking and Finance Review

Global Banking & Finance Review

Company

    GBAF Logo
    • About Us
    • Profile
    • Wealth
    • Privacy & Cookie Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
    • Advertising
    • Submit Post
    • Latest News
    • Research Reports
    • Press Release
    • Awards▾
      • About the Awards
      • Awards TimeTable
      • Submit Nominations
      • Testimonials
      • Media Room
      • Award Winners
      • FAQ

    Global Banking & Finance Review® is a leading financial portal and online magazine offering News, Analysis, Opinion, Reviews, Interviews & Videos from the world of Banking, Finance, Business, Trading, Technology, Investing, Brokerage, Foreign Exchange, Tax & Legal, Islamic Finance, Asset & Wealth Management.
    Copyright © 2010-2025 GBAF Publications Ltd - All Rights Reserved.

    ;
    Editorial & Advertiser disclosure

    Global Banking and Finance Review is an online platform offering news, analysis, and opinion on the latest trends, developments, and innovations in the banking and finance industry worldwide. The platform covers a diverse range of topics, including banking, insurance, investment, wealth management, fintech, and regulatory issues. The website publishes news, press releases, opinion and advertorials on various financial organizations, products and services which are commissioned from various Companies, Organizations, PR agencies, Bloggers etc. These commissioned articles are commercial in nature. This is not to be considered as financial advice and should be considered only for information purposes. It does not reflect the views or opinion of our website and is not to be considered an endorsement or a recommendation. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any information provided with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek Professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. We link to various third-party websites, affiliate sales networks, and to our advertising partners websites. When you view or click on certain links available on our articles, our partners may compensate us for displaying the content to you or make a purchase or fill a form. This will not incur any additional charges to you. To make things simpler for you to identity or distinguish advertised or sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles or links hosted on our site as a commercial article placement. We will not be responsible for any loss you may suffer as a result of any omission or inaccuracy on the website.

    Headlines

    Judgment on soldier tried over 1972 Bloody Sunday killings due next week

    Judgment on soldier tried over 1972 Bloody Sunday killings due next week

    Published by Global Banking and Finance Review

    Posted on October 16, 2025

    Featured image for article about Headlines

    BELFAST (Reuters) -A judgment in the trial of the sole British soldier charged with murder over the 1972 "Bloody Sunday" killings of 13 unarmed Catholic civil rights marchers in Northern Ireland will be given on October 23, the judge said on Thursday.

    The soldier, who cannot be identified and is known as Soldier F, is accused of killing two men and attempting to kill five others when members of a British army regiment opened fire in the mainly Irish nationalist city of Londonderry.

    He had previously pleaded not guilty to the seven charges and was not called to give evidence during the one-month trial that was heard without a jury.

    Bloody Sunday was the deadliest incident of three decades of sectarian violence involving nationalists seeking a united Ireland, unionists wanting to remain part of the United Kingdom and British forces. A 1998 peace deal largely ended the bloodshed.

    Lawyers for the prosecution told the court on Thursday that the only question was whether Soldier F participated in the shooting as a principal or a secondary party.

    Defence lawyers did not call any witnesses and said that military statements taken over 50 years ago were manifestly unreliable with no independent supporting evidence offered to back the prosecution case.

    That made for a "fundamentally flawed case" with a "stream of contaminated evidence", Mark Mulholland, a lawyer for Soldier F, said on Thursday.

    Earlier in the trial, Mulholland read a short statement Soldier F gave to police in 2016, in which he said that while he was sure he properly discharged his duties as a soldier that day, he no longer had any reliable recollection of the events and therefore was unable to answer the officers' questions.

    The British government apologised for the "unjustified and unjustifiable" killings in 2010 after a judicial inquiry found that the victims were innocent and had posed no threat to the military.

    (Reporting by Amanda Ferguson, writing by Padraic HalpinEditing by Tomasz Janowski)

    Why waste money on news and opinions when you can access them for free?

    Take advantage of our newsletter subscription and stay informed on the go!

    Subscribe