Editorial & Advertiser Disclosure Global Banking And Finance Review is an independent publisher which offers News, information, Analysis, Opinion, Press Releases, Reviews, Research reports covering various economies, industries, products, services and companies. The content available on globalbankingandfinance.com is sourced by a mixture of different methods which is not limited to content produced and supplied by various staff writers, journalists, freelancers, individuals, organizations, companies, PR agencies Sponsored Posts etc. The information available on this website is purely for educational and informational purposes only. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any of the information provided at globalbankingandfinance.com with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. Globalbankingandfinance.com also links to various third party websites and we cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of the information provided by third party websites. Links from various articles on our site to third party websites are a mixture of non-sponsored links and sponsored links. Only a very small fraction of the links which point to external websites are affiliate links. Some of the links which you may click on our website may link to various products and services from our partners who may compensate us if you buy a service or product or fill a form or install an app. This will not incur additional cost to you. A very few articles on our website are sponsored posts or paid advertorials. These are marked as sponsored posts at the bottom of each post. For avoidance of any doubts and to make it easier for you to differentiate sponsored or non-sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles on our site or all links to external websites as sponsored . Please note that some of the services or products which we talk about carry a high level of risk and may not be suitable for everyone. These may be complex services or products and we request the readers to consider this purely from an educational standpoint. The information provided on this website is general in nature. Global Banking & Finance Review expressly disclaims any liability without any limitation which may arise directly or indirectly from the use of such information.

Automating loan renewals: The key to adding efficiency and reducing costs

By Neill LeCorgne, VP Banking at Sageworks

Today’s small business loan renewal process takes too long, costs too much and results in lower client satisfaction. This is not a winning approach in an increasingly competitive future. In fact, those that maintain the status quo will miss earnings growth as clients move their business relationship, including critical core deposits and fees, to an institution that can renew their loan fast and easy and with no credit interruption.

Technology adds significant workflow efficiency gains and a reduction in labor investment to the process of renewing performing small business loans. Incorporating technology to shrink the labor- and paper-intensive steps in a loan renewal process can reduce the labor investment per loan by more than 90%, or $2,159.

Multiply this by the number of renewals a bank does each year and the magnitude of opportunity for earnings and efficiency gains is staggering.

Most bankers would agree that a small business loan with a satisfactory repayment history, no major change in market economic conditions and strong financial performance shouldn’t require the same underwriting process as an entirely new loan. Financial institutions should be able to efficiently and appropriately underwrite the renewal utilizing a uniform and short-form process unless a borrower’s payment history, financial ability to pay or any other easily recognizable weakness has occurred. It is also logical that any loan up for renewal that has well-defined weaknesses should be underwritten based on a longer and more traditional in-depth underwriting process; managing risk becomes more of a focal point.

Despite these logical differences in how various renewals should be processed, many financial institutions follow for each loan the same laborintensive process they use to approve and close a new small business loan.

Inconsistent process creates inefficiencies

Neill LeCorgne
Neill LeCorgne

Many institutions have complicated and inefficient processes to manage small business loan renewals. Some have implemented a short form loan process to manage small business loan renewals. However, commonly these short form process changes don’t go far enough and the institution often falls back into the trap of performing steps that mirror a traditional original loan approval process.

Loan renewal processes are commonly found to be inefficient, unstructured and inconsistent across an institution, particularly where the institution has multiple markets and lending teams spread widely over a geographical region. Labor and its associated costs are the primary issue preventing many institutions from an efficient renewal process. As an example, commercial lenders invest hours in visiting clients to gather required loan information. They spend hours evaluating and populating information for a credit memo. Further, a common pet peeve of a commercial lender is spending hours researching deposit, loan and fee information related to a loan relationship for the credit memo. Similarly, credit analysts spend considerable time keystroking and identifying double entry adjustments related to updated financials for borrowing relationships which may have multiple businesses, individuals and affiliated limited liability entities. They also spend time researching and gathering third party information for the renewal including pulling information from credit bureaus.

Virtually all of these labor-intensive steps and investment of time can be replaced by technology. Technology-based workflows bring efficiency, structure and uniformity to the loan renewal process. Institutions have the ability to configure and customize a loan renewal workflow to incorporate the uniqueness of the institution and its staff. The technology-based workflow establishes phases and steps a loan goes through at an institution. Once this workflow is developed,it becomes the engine that supports the sequencing and efficiency of the loan renewal process. This smart technology-based workflow runs automatically in the background of the loan renewal and can be adapted with pre-determined events and dynamic changes, as a specific loan process may need to change. Not every loan starts a workflow and is completed exactly in the same manner. However, an efficient and effective loan renewal workflow will more often follow the same process track.

Institutions looking for the limited number of significant opportunities for earnings and efficiency gains in lending should be sure to note the opportunity provided by bringing automation into the loan renewal process.  Through a combination of the use of new technology and a centralized small business lending portfolio team that includes dedicated portfolio managers and credit analysts, financial institutions have the potential to reduce labor investment by 90 percent, or roughly a cost reduction of $2,159 loan. In making renewals more efficient, they will also serve borrowers better and faster.

Neill LeCorgne is Vice President of Banking at Sageworks, a financial information company that offers lending, credit risk and portfolio risk solutions to over 1,300 financial institutions. He is responsible for working with financial institutions to enhance their operating strategies including improving efficiency in the lending process. Neill has over thirty-three years of experience in the financial industry including eleven years as President and Director of a multi-bank holding company in the state of Florida, seven years as manager of a corporate banking team at a super-regional bank and fifteen years serving financial institutions as Director of Business Development for the Federal Home Loan Banks of Atlanta and Seattle.