Search
00
GBAF Logo
trophy
Top StoriesInterviewsBusinessFinanceBankingTechnologyInvestingTradingVideosAwardsMagazinesHeadlinesTrends

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest news and updates from our team.

Global Banking & Finance Review®

Global Banking & Finance Review® - Subscribe to our newsletter

Company

    GBAF Logo
    • About Us
    • Advertising and Sponsorship
    • Profile & Readership
    • Contact Us
    • Latest News
    • Privacy & Cookies Policies
    • Terms of Use
    • Advertising Terms
    • Issue 81
    • Issue 80
    • Issue 79
    • Issue 78
    • Issue 77
    • Issue 76
    • Issue 75
    • Issue 74
    • Issue 73
    • Issue 72
    • Issue 71
    • Issue 70
    • View All
    • About the Awards
    • Awards Timetable
    • Awards Winners
    • Submit Nominations
    • Testimonials
    • Media Room
    • FAQ
    • Asset Management Awards
    • Brand of the Year Awards
    • Business Awards
    • Cash Management Banking Awards
    • Banking Technology Awards
    • CEO Awards
    • Customer Service Awards
    • CSR Awards
    • Deal of the Year Awards
    • Corporate Governance Awards
    • Corporate Banking Awards
    • Digital Transformation Awards
    • Fintech Awards
    • Education & Training Awards
    • ESG & Sustainability Awards
    • ESG Awards
    • Forex Banking Awards
    • Innovation Awards
    • Insurance & Takaful Awards
    • Investment Banking Awards
    • Investor Relations Awards
    • Leadership Awards
    • Islamic Banking Awards
    • Real Estate Awards
    • Project Finance Awards
    • Process & Product Awards
    • Telecommunication Awards
    • HR & Recruitment Awards
    • Trade Finance Awards
    • The Next 100 Global Awards
    • Wealth Management Awards
    • Travel Awards
    • Years of Excellence Awards
    • Publishing Principles
    • Ownership & Funding
    • Corrections Policy
    • Editorial Code of Ethics
    • Diversity & Inclusion Policy
    • Fact Checking Policy
    Original content: Global Banking and Finance Review - https://www.globalbankingandfinance.com

    A global financial intelligence and recognition platform delivering authoritative insights, data-driven analysis, and institutional benchmarking across Banking, Capital Markets, Investment, Technology, and Financial Infrastructure.

    Copyright © 2010-2026 - All Rights Reserved. | Sitemap | Tags

    Editorial & Advertiser disclosure

    Global Banking & Finance Review® is an online platform offering news, analysis, and opinion on the latest trends, developments, and innovations in the banking and finance industry worldwide. The platform covers a diverse range of topics, including banking, insurance, investment, wealth management, fintech, and regulatory issues. The website publishes news, press releases, opinion and advertorials on various financial organizations, products and services which are commissioned from various Companies, Organizations, PR agencies, Bloggers etc. These commissioned articles are commercial in nature. This is not to be considered as financial advice and should be considered only for information purposes. It does not reflect the views or opinion of our website and is not to be considered an endorsement or a recommendation. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any information provided with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek Professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. We link to various third-party websites, affiliate sales networks, and to our advertising partners websites. When you view or click on certain links available on our articles, our partners may compensate us for displaying the content to you or make a purchase or fill a form. This will not incur any additional charges to you. To make things simpler for you to identity or distinguish advertised or sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles or links hosted on our site as a commercial article placement. We will not be responsible for any loss you may suffer as a result of any omission or inaccuracy on the website.

    1. Home
    2. >Headlines
    3. >Analysis-BlackRock, Vanguard scale back company talks as new guidance bites
    Headlines

    Analysis-BlackRock, Vanguard Scale Back Company Talks as New Guidance Bites

    Published by Global Banking & Finance Review®

    Posted on September 19, 2025

    4 min read

    Last updated: January 21, 2026

    Add as preferred source on Google
    Analysis-BlackRock, Vanguard scale back company talks as new guidance bites - Headlines news and analysis from Global Banking & Finance Review
    Why waste money on news and opinion when you can access them for free?

    Take advantage of our newsletter subscription and stay informed on the go!

    Subscribe

    Tags:corporate governanceinvestment managersfinancial marketsClimate Changeasset management

    Quick Summary

    BlackRock and Vanguard have reduced company meetings due to new SEC guidance, impacting discussions on climate change and diversity.

    BlackRock and Vanguard Reduce Engagements with Companies Amid New SEC Rules

    By Ross Kerber

    (Reuters) - The world's two biggest asset managers sharply scaled back the number of meetings held with company bosses this year, disclosures show, as new guidance made it harder to discuss topics like climate change and diversity.

    The shifts by BlackRock and Vanguard came in the wake of new guidance in February from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, led by a pick of U.S. President Donald Trump, Mark Uyeda, and could leave executives with less investor input on strategy or facing surprise critical votes at shareholder meetings.

    The directives were among a series of recent Republican efforts to diminish corporate actions on everything from company climate disclosures to the role of proxy advisors.

    Tallies in new disclosures show declines of 28% and 44% for BlackRock and Vanguard, respectively, compared to their meetings in year-ago periods. 

    Several consultants said the declines show how the guidance has quieted talks between shareholders and managers ahead of corporate elections on matters beyond politically contentious issues like climate change, such as directorships or executive pay.

    "The new guidance, whether intentional or not, created a chilling effect on the largest investors," said Peter da Silva Vint, a former BlackRock executive now with corporate adviser Jasper Street Partners.

    Often fund managers come to meetings in "listen-only mode," da Silva Vint said, which makes it harder for company leaders to tell how fund managers might vote.

    Surprises matter. While climate and social questions have taken up less bandwidth at corporate annual meetings lately, items on corporate governance continue to win support. Both Vanguard and BlackRock ended support for nearly all climate and social resolutions in previous years, a pattern that continued in 2025.

    TALK LESS, SMILE MORE    

    The new SEC guidance tells managers to file more complex, expensive forms to report major holdings if they exert "pressure on management" such as tying director votes to whether a company has a staggered board or undertakes certain environmental policies.

    The reporting requirement could also be triggered if the fund firm "states or implies" it will not support directors unless a company makes changes in line with a fund's voting policy.

    An SEC representative declined to comment.

    The shift mainly affected BlackRock and Vanguard, whose combined $22 trillion means both firms often own more than 5% of stock issuers, the filing threshold. The two firms paused and then resumed contact while taking stock of the new guidance.

    Now the fund firms' reports show a changed pattern. BlackRock's stewardship team met with companies worldwide 2,584 times during the 12 months ended June 30, a drop of 28% from the year-earlier period. 

    Most of the proxy-related engagements would have happened after the Feb. 11 SEC guidance, said Paul Schulman, senior managing director for proxy solicitor Sodali. He called the guidance "100% the cause" of the meeting declines.

    Schulman said even when meetings occur, stewardship teams say less about how they plan to cast their proxy votes. Top investment firms "have always been hesitant to disclose to the company how they’re going to vote. Now they're hesitant to signal their thinking on the issues," Schulman said.

    BlackRock has not given a quarterly count of its meetings. In its recent report, it said at the meetings its stewardship team "listened to company directors and executives to understand how they are overseeing material business risks and opportunities," and that it may convey concerns through its AGM votes.

    Last year's report paints BlackRock's stewardship team as being more outspoken. Where it had concerns, the fund manager said at the time, "we typically raise these through dialogue with board members and management teams first."

    Asked for comment, a BlackRock representative noted its past statement that "does not use engagement as a way to control publicly traded companies."

    For Vanguard, an Aug. 21 report showed the Pennsylvania firm met with 356 companies worldwide from April through June this year, down 44% from the 640 in the same period in 2024. Vanguard's report didn't address the decline, and a representative declined to comment.

    A Vanguard representative said the company "does not, and never has, used engagements with companies to signal our voting intentions."

    'MORE CHALLENGING' ENVIRONMENT

    Paul Washington, chief executive of the Society for Corporate Governance, which represents corporate secretaries and others, said the new guidance limits the value of shareholder talks. 

    "This season companies found it harder to know what their major investors were thinking," he said.

    In a survey, more than a quarter of public company society members said they found a "more challenging engagement environment" this year with companies having trouble maintaining relationships with investors or exploring their views.

    (Reporting by Ross Kerber in Boston; Editing by Nick Zieminski)

    Key Takeaways

    • •BlackRock and Vanguard reduced company meetings by 28% and 44%.
    • •New SEC guidance impacts discussions on climate change and diversity.
    • •The guidance creates a 'chilling effect' on investor engagement.
    • •Fund managers are less vocal about proxy voting intentions.
    • •Corporate governance topics still receive support despite reduced meetings.

    Frequently Asked Questions about Analysis-BlackRock, Vanguard scale back company talks as new guidance bites

    1What caused BlackRock and Vanguard to reduce company meetings?

    The reduction in meetings by BlackRock and Vanguard was primarily due to new guidance from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, which made discussions more complex and challenging.

    2
    How much did BlackRock and Vanguard's meetings decline?

    BlackRock's meetings declined by 28%, while Vanguard's decreased by 44% compared to the previous year.

    3What is the main concern regarding the new SEC guidance?

    The main concern is that the new SEC guidance has created a chilling effect on investor engagement, making it harder for companies to understand the intentions of their major investors.

    4What did BlackRock's stewardship team focus on during meetings?

    During meetings, BlackRock's stewardship team focused on listening to company directors and executives to understand their operations, rather than actively discussing their voting intentions.

    5What was the response from Vanguard regarding their engagement strategy?

    A Vanguard representative stated that the firm does not use engagements with companies to signal their voting intentions, emphasizing a commitment to independent decision-making.

    More from Headlines

    Explore more articles in the Headlines category

    Image for Iranian strikes pose ‘existential threat’, Gulf states tell UN
    Iranian Strikes Pose ‘existential Threat’, Gulf States Tell UN
    Image for Russia says it remains in contact with US on Ukraine settlement
    Russia Says It Remains in Contact With US on Ukraine Settlement
    Image for Putin allies Lukashenko and Kim meet in North Korea
    Putin Allies Lukashenko and Kim Meet in North Korea
    Image for Denmark's Frederiksen faces tough coalition talks to remain prime minister
    Denmark's Frederiksen Faces Tough Coalition Talks to Remain Prime Minister
    Image for UK police arrest two men over arson attack on Jewish community ambulances
    UK Police Arrest Two Men Over Arson Attack on Jewish Community Ambulances
    Image for Cricket-Bairstow joins Livingstone in criticising level of care in England set-up
    Cricket-Bairstow Joins Livingstone in Criticising Level of Care in England Set-Up
    Image for Mullally to be installed as first female Archbishop of Canterbury
    Mullally to Be Installed as First Female Archbishop of Canterbury
    Image for Cyprus seeks new security deal for UK bases, Telegraph reports
    Cyprus Seeks New Security Deal for UK Bases, Telegraph Reports
    Image for British army veteran completes record 100km Land Rover pull
    British Army Veteran Completes Record 100km Land Rover Pull
    Image for Pope Leo laments that Iran war 'getting worse and worse'
    Pope Leo Laments That Iran War 'getting Worse and Worse'
    Image for Denmark's left-wing bloc leads election but lacks majority, exit polls show
    Denmark's Left-Wing Bloc Leads Election but Lacks Majority, Exit Polls Show
    Image for Moldovan parliament backs energy state of emergency after power line put out of action
    Moldovan Parliament Backs Energy State of Emergency After Power Line Put Out of Action
    View All Headlines Posts
    Previous Headlines PostUkraine Migrant Flows After War May Prove Key to Central Europe's Growth Prospects, S&P Says
    Next Headlines PostFactbox-Why Moldova's Upcoming Parliamentary Election Matters