Search
00
GBAF Logo
trophy
Top StoriesInterviewsBusinessFinanceBankingTechnologyInvestingTradingVideosAwardsMagazinesHeadlinesTrends

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest news and updates from our team.

Global Banking and Finance Review

Global Banking and Finance Review - Subscribe to our newsletter

Company

    GBAF Logo
    • About Us
    • Profile
    • Privacy & Cookie Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
    • Advertising
    • Submit Post
    • Latest News
    • Research Reports
    • Press Release
    • Awards▾
      • About the Awards
      • Awards TimeTable
      • Submit Nominations
      • Testimonials
      • Media Room
      • Award Winners
      • FAQ
    • Magazines▾
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 79
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 78
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 77
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 76
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 75
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 73
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 71
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 70
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 69
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 66
    Top StoriesInterviewsBusinessFinanceBankingTechnologyInvestingTradingVideosAwardsMagazinesHeadlinesTrends

    Global Banking & Finance Review® is a leading financial portal and online magazine offering News, Analysis, Opinion, Reviews, Interviews & Videos from the world of Banking, Finance, Business, Trading, Technology, Investing, Brokerage, Foreign Exchange, Tax & Legal, Islamic Finance, Asset & Wealth Management.
    Copyright © 2010-2026 GBAF Publications Ltd - All Rights Reserved. | Sitemap | Tags | Developed By eCorpIT

    Editorial & Advertiser disclosure

    Global Banking and Finance Review is an online platform offering news, analysis, and opinion on the latest trends, developments, and innovations in the banking and finance industry worldwide. The platform covers a diverse range of topics, including banking, insurance, investment, wealth management, fintech, and regulatory issues. The website publishes news, press releases, opinion and advertorials on various financial organizations, products and services which are commissioned from various Companies, Organizations, PR agencies, Bloggers etc. These commissioned articles are commercial in nature. This is not to be considered as financial advice and should be considered only for information purposes. It does not reflect the views or opinion of our website and is not to be considered an endorsement or a recommendation. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any information provided with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek Professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. We link to various third-party websites, affiliate sales networks, and to our advertising partners websites. When you view or click on certain links available on our articles, our partners may compensate us for displaying the content to you or make a purchase or fill a form. This will not incur any additional charges to you. To make things simpler for you to identity or distinguish advertised or sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles or links hosted on our site as a commercial article placement. We will not be responsible for any loss you may suffer as a result of any omission or inaccuracy on the website.

    Home > Headlines > Did Trump save Intel? Not really
    Headlines

    Did Trump save Intel? Not really

    Published by Global Banking and Finance Review

    Posted on August 23, 2025

    5 min read

    Last updated: January 22, 2026

    Did Trump save Intel? Not really - Headlines news and analysis from Global Banking & Finance Review
    Why waste money on news and opinion when you can access them for free?

    Take advantage of our newsletter subscription and stay informed on the go!

    Subscribe

    Tags:innovationequitycustomersfinancial crisisGovernment funding

    Quick Summary

    Trump's $9B investment in Intel aims to boost its chipmaking, but analysts doubt it will solve Intel's customer and yield challenges.

    Did Trump's Investment in Intel Really Change Its Prospects?

    By Jaspreet Singh, Max A. Cherney and Sayantani Ghosh

    SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump is injecting nearly $9 billion into Intel in exchange for a 9.9% equity stake. But the money - which the struggling chipmaker was slated to receive anyway under a federal funding act - will not be enough for its contract-chipmaking business to flourish, analysts said.

    What Intel needs is external customers for its so-called cutting-edge 14A manufacturing process - a tough ask, at least in the short term. 

    CEO Lip Bu Tan, who took the top job in March, warned last month that the company may have to quit the chip contracting business if it does not land any big clients. "Going forward, our investment in Intel 14A will be based on confirmed customer commitments," he said. 

    Kinngai Chan, analyst at Summit Insights, underlined the economic rationale of Tan's message: “Intel must secure enough customers' volume to go to production for its 18A and 14A nodes to make its foundry arm economically viable,” he said, referring to Intel's manufacturing processes.

    “We don't think any government investment will change the fate of its foundry arm if they cannot secure enough customers.”

    The chipmaker, once synonymous with American chipmaking prowess, has stumbled due to years of management missteps, ceding its manufacturing lead to Taiwan's TSMC and losing out on the race for artificial intelligence chips to Nvidia.

    Now, at an impasse, Intel needs to prove it is capable of making advanced chips to attract customers. Reuters has reported that Intel’s current 18A process - less advanced than 14A - is facing problems with yield, the measure of how many chips printed are good enough to make available to customers.

    Large chip factories including TSMC swallow the cost of poor yields during the first iterations of the process when working with customers like Apple. For Intel, which reported net losses for six straight quarters, that's hard to do and still turn a profit. 

    “If the yield is bad then new customers won't use Intel Foundry, so it really won't fix the technical aspect of the company,” said Ryuta Makino, analyst at Gabelli Funds, which holds Intel stock. 

    Makino, who believes that Intel can ultimately produce chips at optimal yields, views the deal as a net negative for Intel compared with just receiving the funding under the CHIPS Act as originally promised under the Biden Administration.  

    "This isn't free money," he said.

    The federal government will not take a seat on Intel's board and has agreed to vote with the company's board on matters that need shareholder approval, Intel said. But this voting agreement comes with "limited exceptions" and the government is getting Intel's shares at a 17.5% discount to their closing price on Friday. 

    The stake will make the U.S. government Intel's biggest shareholder, though neither Trump nor Intel disclosed when the transaction would happen.

    Intel's shares closed up 5.5% on Friday on news of the government's equity stake, but fell 1% in post-market trading after the chipmaker detailed the terms of the deal. They have risen 23% so far this year as Tan has announced huge job cuts.

    'MARGINALLY WEAKER APPETITE'

    The investment, the latest extraordinary intervention by the White House in corporate America, is consistent with the president's desire to boost domestic production and bring back jobs. It follows comments from Trump earlier this month calling Tan "highly conflicted" due to his ties to Chinese firms and demanding Tan's resignation. However, Trump soon changed his mind about Tan.

    Some analysts say Intel could benefit from the government's support, including in building out factories.

    Intel has said it is investing more than $100 billion to expand its U.S. factories and expects to begin high-volume chip production later this year at its Arizona plant. 

    "To have access to capital and a new partial owner that wants to see you succeed are both important," said Peter Tuz, president of Chase Investment Counsel.

    The government's $8.9 billion investment is in addition to the $2.2 billion in grants Intel has received to date, making for a total investment of $11.1 billion, Intel said in a statement. 

    The government will also receive a five-year warrant, at $20 per share for an additional five percent of Intel stock, exercisable if Intel ceases to own at least 51% of the foundry business.

    "On one hand, a government stake could be viewed as a strong signal that Intel is 'too big to fail.' On the other hand, people are concerned about potential governance implications and how that may impact the company’s ability to act in the best interest of shareholders," Andy Li, a senior analyst at CreditSights.

    "The company is not receiving incremental government funding ... that indicates a marginally weaker appetite of the U.S. government to provide support."

    The investment follows a $2 billion infusion from SoftBank announced earlier this week.

    "This is a great deal for America and, also, a great deal for Intel. Building leading edge semiconductors and chips, which is what Intel does, is fundamental to the future of our nation," Trump said on Friday.

    (Reporting by Jaspreet Singh in Bengaluru, and Max Cherney and Sayantani Ghosh in San Francisco; Additional reporting by Juby Babu in Mexico, and Lewis S. Krauskopf and Shankar Ramakrishnan in New York; Editing by Shri Navaratnam)

    Key Takeaways

    • •Trump's $9 billion investment in Intel is tied to a 9.9% equity stake.
    • •Intel's success depends on securing external customers for its 14A process.
    • •Analysts doubt government investment alone can save Intel's foundry business.
    • •Intel faces challenges in chip yields and competition from TSMC and Nvidia.
    • •The U.S. government becomes Intel's largest shareholder with this deal.

    Frequently Asked Questions about Did Trump save Intel? Not really

    1What is the amount of investment Trump is making in Intel?

    U.S. President Donald Trump is injecting nearly $9 billion into Intel in exchange for a 9.9% equity stake.

    2What does Intel need to improve its foundry business?

    Intel needs to secure enough customers for its 14A manufacturing process to go into production and attract clients.

    3How has the market reacted to the news of the government's equity stake?

    Intel's shares closed up 5.5% on the news but fell 1% in post-market trading after the details of the deal were disclosed.

    4What are analysts saying about the government's investment?

    Some analysts believe that while the government's support could help Intel, it won't change the fate of its foundry arm without securing enough customers.

    5What is the total amount of government funding Intel has received?

    The government's $8.9 billion investment is in addition to the $2.2 billion in grants Intel has received, totaling $11.1 billion.

    More from Headlines

    Explore more articles in the Headlines category

    Image for Activist shareholder ACCR, pension funds urge BP to show shift to oil and gas will deliver value
    Activist shareholder ACCR, pension funds urge BP to show shift to oil and gas will deliver value
    Image for Google Cloud, Liberty Global strike five-year AI partnership
    Google Cloud, Liberty Global strike five-year AI partnership
    Image for Ukrainian capital Kyiv under missile attack, officials say
    Ukrainian capital Kyiv under missile attack, officials say
    Image for EU proposals set to limit EV sales from 2035, says campaign group
    EU proposals set to limit EV sales from 2035, says campaign group
    Image for Trading Day: Solid data over hard assets
    Trading Day: Solid data over hard assets
    Image for Queen's University Belfast cuts ties with US politician Mitchell over Epstein files
    Queen's University Belfast cuts ties with US politician Mitchell over Epstein files
    Image for UK police review reports of alleged misconduct by Mandelson after Epstein files release
    UK police review reports of alleged misconduct by Mandelson after Epstein files release
    Image for Russia says foreign forces in Ukraine would be 'legitimate targets'
    Russia says foreign forces in Ukraine would be 'legitimate targets'
    Image for Swiss National Bank Chairman says current situation not easy for policy
    Swiss National Bank Chairman says current situation not easy for policy
    Image for Recycling body opposes EU scrap aluminium export curbs
    Recycling body opposes EU scrap aluminium export curbs
    Image for Czech leader urges EU to overhaul carbon trading schemes to curb energy costs
    Czech leader urges EU to overhaul carbon trading schemes to curb energy costs
    Image for US to cut tariffs on India to 18%, India agrees to end Russian oil purchases
    US to cut tariffs on India to 18%, India agrees to end Russian oil purchases
    View All Headlines Posts
    Previous Headlines PostUK's Farage sets out plan for 'mass deportation' of asylum seekers
    Next Headlines PostFrance summons Italian ambassador over challenge to Macron on Ukraine