Search
00
GBAF Logo
trophy
Top StoriesInterviewsBusinessFinanceBankingTechnologyInvestingTradingVideosAwardsMagazinesHeadlinesTrends

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest news and updates from our team.

Global Banking & Finance Review®

Global Banking & Finance Review® - Subscribe to our newsletter

Company

    GBAF Logo
    • About Us
    • Advertising and Sponsorship
    • Profile & Readership
    • Contact Us
    • Latest News
    • Privacy & Cookies Policies
    • Terms of Use
    • Advertising Terms
    • Issue 81
    • Issue 80
    • Issue 79
    • Issue 78
    • Issue 77
    • Issue 76
    • Issue 75
    • Issue 74
    • Issue 73
    • Issue 72
    • Issue 71
    • Issue 70
    • View All
    • About the Awards
    • Awards Timetable
    • Awards Winners
    • Submit Nominations
    • Testimonials
    • Media Room
    • FAQ
    • Asset Management Awards
    • Brand of the Year Awards
    • Business Awards
    • Cash Management Banking Awards
    • Banking Technology Awards
    • CEO Awards
    • Customer Service Awards
    • CSR Awards
    • Deal of the Year Awards
    • Corporate Governance Awards
    • Corporate Banking Awards
    • Digital Transformation Awards
    • Fintech Awards
    • Education & Training Awards
    • ESG & Sustainability Awards
    • ESG Awards
    • Forex Banking Awards
    • Innovation Awards
    • Insurance & Takaful Awards
    • Investment Banking Awards
    • Investor Relations Awards
    • Leadership Awards
    • Islamic Banking Awards
    • Real Estate Awards
    • Project Finance Awards
    • Process & Product Awards
    • Telecommunication Awards
    • HR & Recruitment Awards
    • Trade Finance Awards
    • The Next 100 Global Awards
    • Wealth Management Awards
    • Travel Awards
    • Years of Excellence Awards
    • Publishing Principles
    • Ownership & Funding
    • Corrections Policy
    • Editorial Code of Ethics
    • Diversity & Inclusion Policy
    • Fact Checking Policy
    Original content: Global Banking and Finance Review - https://www.globalbankingandfinance.com

    A global financial intelligence and recognition platform delivering authoritative insights, data-driven analysis, and institutional benchmarking across Banking, Capital Markets, Investment, Technology, and Financial Infrastructure.

    Copyright © 2010-2026 - All Rights Reserved. | Sitemap | Tags

    Editorial & Advertiser disclosure

    Global Banking & Finance Review® is an online platform offering news, analysis, and opinion on the latest trends, developments, and innovations in the banking and finance industry worldwide. The platform covers a diverse range of topics, including banking, insurance, investment, wealth management, fintech, and regulatory issues. The website publishes news, press releases, opinion and advertorials on various financial organizations, products and services which are commissioned from various Companies, Organizations, PR agencies, Bloggers etc. These commissioned articles are commercial in nature. This is not to be considered as financial advice and should be considered only for information purposes. It does not reflect the views or opinion of our website and is not to be considered an endorsement or a recommendation. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any information provided with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek Professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. We link to various third-party websites, affiliate sales networks, and to our advertising partners websites. When you view or click on certain links available on our articles, our partners may compensate us for displaying the content to you or make a purchase or fill a form. This will not incur any additional charges to you. To make things simpler for you to identity or distinguish advertised or sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles or links hosted on our site as a commercial article placement. We will not be responsible for any loss you may suffer as a result of any omission or inaccuracy on the website.

    1. Home
    2. >Headlines
    3. >Satellite images indicate severe damage to Fordow, but doubts remain
    Headlines

    Satellite Images Indicate Severe Damage to Fordow, but Doubts Remain

    Published by Global Banking & Finance Review®

    Posted on June 22, 2025

    5 min read

    Last updated: January 23, 2026

    Add as preferred source on Google
    Satellite images indicate severe damage to Fordow, but doubts remain - Headlines news and analysis from Global Banking & Finance Review
    Why waste money on news and opinion when you can access them for free?

    Take advantage of our newsletter subscription and stay informed on the go!

    Subscribe

    Tags:financial crisisinvestmentforeign currencyfinancial stabilityfinancial markets

    Quick Summary

    Satellite images indicate severe damage to Iran's Fordow nuclear site by U.S. attack, but doubts remain about the extent of destruction.

    Satellite Imagery Reveals Significant Damage to Iran's Fordow Nuclear Site

    By Jonathan Landay

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Commercial satellite imagery indicates the U.S. attack on Iran’s Fordow nuclear plant severely damaged - and possibly destroyed - the deeply-buried site and the uranium-enriching centrifuges it housed, but there was no confirmation, experts said on Sunday.

    “They just punched through with these MOPs,” said David Albright, a former U.N. nuclear inspector who heads the Institute for Science and International Security, referring to the Massive Ordnance Penetrator bunker-busting bombs that the U.S. said it dropped. “I would expect that the facility is probably toast.” 

    But confirmation of the below-ground destruction could not be determined, noted Decker Eveleth, an associate researcher with the CNA Corporation who specializes in satellite imagery. The hall containing hundreds of centrifuges is "too deeply buried for us to evaluate the level of damage based on satellite imagery," he said.

    To defend against attacks such as the one conducted by U.S. forces early on Sunday, Iran buried much of its nuclear program in fortified sites deep underground, including into the side of a mountain at Fordow.

    Satellite images show six holes where the bunker-busting bombs appear to have penetrated the mountain, and then ground that looks disturbed and covered in dust.

    The United States and Israel have said they intend to halt Tehran's nuclear program. But a failure to completely destroy its facilities and equipment could mean Iran could more easily restart the weapons program that U.S. intelligence and the U.N. International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) say it shuttered in 2003.

    'UNUSUAL ACTIVITY'

    Several experts also cautioned that Iran likely moved a stockpile of near weapons-grade highly enriched uranium out of Fordow before the strike early Sunday morning and could be hiding it and other nuclear components in locations unknown to Israel, the U.S. and U.N. nuclear inspectors.

    They noted satellite imagery from Maxar Technologies showing "unusual activity" at Fordow on Thursday and Friday, with a long line of vehicles waiting outside an entrance of the facility. A senior Iranian source told Reuters on Sunday most of the near weapons-grade 60% highly enriched uranium had been moved to an undisclosed location before the U.S. attack.

    "I don't think you can with great confidence do anything but set back their nuclear program by maybe a few years," said Jeffrey Lewis of the Middlebury Institute of International Studies at Monterey. "There's almost certainly facilities that we don't know about."

    Arizona Sen. Mark Kelly, a Democrat and member of the Senate intelligence committee who said he had been reviewing intelligence every day, expressed the same concern.

    "My big fear right now is that they take this entire program underground, not physically underground, but under the radar," he told NBC News. "Where we tried to stop it, there is a possibility that this could accelerate it."

    Iran long has insisted that its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes.

    But in response to Israel's attacks, Iran's parliament is threatening to withdraw from the Non-Proliferation Treaty, the cornerstone of the international system that went into force in 1970 to stop the spread of nuclear weapons, ending cooperation with the IAEA.

    "The world is going to be in the dark about what Iran may be doing," said Daryl Kimball, executive director of the Arms Control Association advocacy group.

    'DOUBLE TAP'

    Reuters spoke to four experts who reviewed Maxar Technologies satellite imagery of Fordow showing six neatly spaced holes in two groups in the mountain ridge beneath which the hall containing the centrifuges is believed to be located.

    General Dan Caine, chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, told reporters that seven B-2 bombers dropped 14 GBU-57/B MOPs, 30,000-pound precision-guided bombs designed to drive up to 200 feet into hardened underground facilities like Fordow, according to a 2012 congressional report.

    Caine said initial assessments indicated that the sites suffered extremely severe damage, but declined to speculate about whether any nuclear facilities remained intact.

    Eveleth said the Maxar imagery of Fordow and Caine's comments indicated that the B-2s dropped an initial load of six MOPs on Fordow, followed by a "double tap" of six more in the exact same spots.

    Operation Midnight Hammer also targeted Tehran’s main uranium enrichment facility at Natanz, he said, and struck in Isfahan, the location of the country's largest nuclear research center. There are other nuclear-related sites near the city.

    Israel had already struck Natanz and the Isfahan Nuclear Research Center in its 10-day war with Iran.

    Albright said in a post on X that Airbus Defence and Space satellite imagery showed that U.S. Tomahawk cruise missiles severely damaged a uranium facility at Isfahan and an impact hole above the underground enrichment halls at Natanz reportedly caused by a Massive Ordnance Penetrator bunker-busting bomb that "likely destroyed the facility."

    Albright questioned the U.S. use of cruise missiles in Isfahan, saying that those weapons could not penetrate a tunnel complex near the main nuclear research center believed to be even deeper than Fordow. The IAEA said the tunnel entrances "were impacted."

    He noted that Iran recently informed the IAEA that it planned to install a new uranium enrichment plant in Isfahan.

    "There may be 2,000 to 3,000 more centrifuges that were slated to go into this new enrichment plant," he said. "Where are they?"

    (Reporting by Jonathan Landay and Milan Pavacic; Editing by Don Durfee and Michael Learmonth)

    Key Takeaways

    • •Satellite images suggest severe damage to Iran's Fordow site.
    • •U.S. bunker-busting bombs likely caused the damage.
    • •Experts doubt the complete destruction of the facility.
    • •Iran may have moved enriched uranium before the attack.
    • •Concerns about Iran's nuclear program resurfacing.

    Frequently Asked Questions about Satellite images indicate severe damage to Fordow, but doubts remain

    1What does satellite imagery indicate about the Fordow nuclear site?

    Satellite imagery suggests that the U.S. attack on Iran's Fordow nuclear plant severely damaged and possibly destroyed the site.

    2
    What concerns do experts have regarding Iran's nuclear program?

    Experts are concerned that Iran likely moved a stockpile of near weapons-grade highly enriched uranium out of Fordow before the strike, which could allow them to restart their nuclear program more easily.

    3What was the nature of the U.S. attack on Fordow?

    The U.S. attack involved B-2 bombers dropping Massive Ordnance Penetrators (MOPs) that penetrated deep into the mountain where Fordow is located.

    4How might Iran respond to the attacks on its nuclear facilities?

    In response to the attacks, Iran's parliament is threatening to withdraw from the Non-Proliferation Treaty, which could lead to increased secrecy regarding its nuclear activities.

    5What did General Dan Caine say about the damage assessment?

    General Dan Caine indicated that initial assessments showed extremely severe damage to the sites, but he did not speculate on whether any nuclear facilities remained intact.

    More from Headlines

    Explore more articles in the Headlines category

    Image for Netanyahu seeks to avoid snap vote as Iran war gives no boost in polls
    Netanyahu Seeks to Avoid Snap Vote as Iran War Gives No Boost in Polls
    Image for Cyprus has opened discussion with UK over its bases, president says
    Cyprus Has Opened Discussion With UK Over Its Bases, President Says
    Image for Once inspired by Orban, Hungary's Peter Magyar now leads the charge to unseat him
    Once Inspired by Orban, Hungary's Peter Magyar Now Leads the Charge to Unseat Him
    Image for German foreign minister hopes Iran peace talks given chance to work
    German Foreign Minister Hopes Iran Peace Talks Given Chance to Work
    Image for Factbox-What's at stake in Hungary's parliamentary election?
    Factbox-What's at Stake in Hungary's Parliamentary Election?
    Image for Hezbollah chief rejects talks with Israel under fire, vows fighters will continue 'without limits'
    Hezbollah Chief Rejects Talks With Israel Under Fire, Vows Fighters Will Continue 'without Limits'
    Image for Hundreds evacuated after fire hits luxury Paris hotel
    Hundreds Evacuated After Fire Hits Luxury Paris Hotel
    Image for Pope Leo names Australian bishop to lead Vatican's legal office
    Pope Leo Names Australian Bishop to Lead Vatican's Legal Office
    Image for Russia says it supplies fuel to Cuba as humanitarian aid
    Russia Says It Supplies Fuel to Cuba as Humanitarian Aid
    Image for Iranian strikes pose ‘existential threat’, Gulf states tell UN
    Iranian Strikes Pose ‘existential Threat’, Gulf States Tell UN
    Image for Russia says it remains in contact with US on Ukraine settlement
    Russia Says It Remains in Contact With US on Ukraine Settlement
    Image for Putin allies Lukashenko and Kim meet in North Korea
    Putin Allies Lukashenko and Kim Meet in North Korea
    View All Headlines Posts
    Previous Headlines PostAustralia Says It Supports US Strike, Calls for Return to Diplomacy
    Next Headlines PostBritain's Industrial Strategy Cuts Green Levy to Lower Energy Bills