Search
00
GBAF Logo
trophy
Top StoriesInterviewsBusinessFinanceBankingTechnologyInvestingTradingVideosAwardsMagazinesHeadlinesTrends

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest news and updates from our team.

Global Banking & Finance Review®

Global Banking & Finance Review® - Subscribe to our newsletter

Company

    GBAF Logo
    • About Us
    • Advertising and Sponsorship
    • Profile & Readership
    • Contact Us
    • Latest News
    • Privacy & Cookies Policies
    • Terms of Use
    • Advertising Terms
    • Issue 81
    • Issue 80
    • Issue 79
    • Issue 78
    • Issue 77
    • Issue 76
    • Issue 75
    • Issue 74
    • Issue 73
    • Issue 72
    • Issue 71
    • Issue 70
    • View All
    • About the Awards
    • Awards Timetable
    • Awards Winners
    • Submit Nominations
    • Testimonials
    • Media Room
    • FAQ
    • Asset Management Awards
    • Brand of the Year Awards
    • Business Awards
    • Cash Management Banking Awards
    • Banking Technology Awards
    • CEO Awards
    • Customer Service Awards
    • CSR Awards
    • Deal of the Year Awards
    • Corporate Governance Awards
    • Corporate Banking Awards
    • Digital Transformation Awards
    • Fintech Awards
    • Education & Training Awards
    • ESG & Sustainability Awards
    • ESG Awards
    • Forex Banking Awards
    • Innovation Awards
    • Insurance & Takaful Awards
    • Investment Banking Awards
    • Investor Relations Awards
    • Leadership Awards
    • Islamic Banking Awards
    • Real Estate Awards
    • Project Finance Awards
    • Process & Product Awards
    • Telecommunication Awards
    • HR & Recruitment Awards
    • Trade Finance Awards
    • The Next 100 Global Awards
    • Wealth Management Awards
    • Travel Awards
    • Years of Excellence Awards
    • Publishing Principles
    • Ownership & Funding
    • Corrections Policy
    • Editorial Code of Ethics
    • Diversity & Inclusion Policy
    • Fact Checking Policy
    Original content: Global Banking and Finance Review - https://www.globalbankingandfinance.com

    A global financial intelligence and recognition platform delivering authoritative insights, data-driven analysis, and institutional benchmarking across Banking, Capital Markets, Investment, Technology, and Financial Infrastructure.

    Copyright © 2010-2026 - All Rights Reserved. | Sitemap | Tags

    Editorial & Advertiser disclosure

    Global Banking & Finance Review® is an online platform offering news, analysis, and opinion on the latest trends, developments, and innovations in the banking and finance industry worldwide. The platform covers a diverse range of topics, including banking, insurance, investment, wealth management, fintech, and regulatory issues. The website publishes news, press releases, opinion and advertorials on various financial organizations, products and services which are commissioned from various Companies, Organizations, PR agencies, Bloggers etc. These commissioned articles are commercial in nature. This is not to be considered as financial advice and should be considered only for information purposes. It does not reflect the views or opinion of our website and is not to be considered an endorsement or a recommendation. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any information provided with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek Professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. We link to various third-party websites, affiliate sales networks, and to our advertising partners websites. When you view or click on certain links available on our articles, our partners may compensate us for displaying the content to you or make a purchase or fill a form. This will not incur any additional charges to you. To make things simpler for you to identity or distinguish advertised or sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles or links hosted on our site as a commercial article placement. We will not be responsible for any loss you may suffer as a result of any omission or inaccuracy on the website.

    1. Home
    2. >Headlines
    3. >Explainer-How much damage have Israeli strikes caused to Iran's nuclear programme?
    Headlines

    Explainer-How Much Damage Have Israeli Strikes Caused to Iran's Nuclear Programme?

    Published by Global Banking & Finance Review®

    Posted on June 16, 2025

    7 min read

    Last updated: January 23, 2026

    Add as preferred source on Google
    Explainer-How much damage have Israeli strikes caused to Iran's nuclear programme? - Headlines news and analysis from Global Banking & Finance Review
    Why waste money on news and opinion when you can access them for free?

    Take advantage of our newsletter subscription and stay informed on the go!

    Subscribe

    Tags:financial crisisinvestmentforeign exchangefinancial marketsCryptocurrencies

    Quick Summary

    Israeli strikes have impacted Iran's nuclear facilities, damaging Natanz and destroying PFEP, raising concerns over uranium enrichment levels.

    Assessing the Impact of Israeli Strikes on Iran's Nuclear Program

    By Francois Murphy

    VIENNA (Reuters) -Israel has carried out wide-ranging military strikes on Iran, hitting sites including some of its most important nuclear facilities.

    Below is a summary of what is known about the damage inflicted on Iran's nuclear programme, incorporating data from the last quarterly report by the U.N. nuclear watchdog on May 31.

    OVERVIEW

    Iran is enriching uranium to up to 60% purity. This could easily be refined further to the roughly 90% which is weapons grade.

    The International Atomic Energy Agency, which inspects Iran's nuclear sites including its enrichment plants, says that is of "serious concern" because no other country has enriched to that level without producing nuclear weapons. Western powers say there is no civil justification for enrichment to that level.

    Iran denies seeking nuclear weapons. It points to its right to nuclear technology for peaceful purposes, including enrichment, as a party to the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.

    Israel, which is not a party to the NPT, is the only country in the Middle East widely believed to have nuclear weapons. Israel does not deny or confirm that.

    HEART OF THE PROGRAMME: URANIUM ENRICHMENT

    Iran had three operating uranium enrichment plants when Israel began its attacks:

    * The Fuel Enrichment Plant (FEP) at Natanz (power supply hit)

    A vast underground facility designed to house 50,0000 centrifuges, the machines that enrich uranium.

    There has long been speculation among military experts about whether Israeli airstrikes could destroy the facility given that it is several floors underground.

    There are about 17,000 centrifuges installed there, of which around 13,500 were operating at last count, enriching uranium to up to 5%.

    Electricity infrastructure at Natanz was destroyed, IAEA chief Rafael Grossi told the U.N. Security Council on Friday, specifically an electrical sub-station, the main electric power supply building, emergency power supply and back-up generators.

    While there was no indication of a physical attack on the underground hall containing the FEP, "the loss of power ... may have damaged the centrifuges there", he said.

    Grossi has cited unspecified "information available to the IAEA". While Iran has provided the agency with some information, the IAEA generally makes extensive use of satellite imagery.

    * The Pilot Fuel Enrichment Plant (PFEP) at Natanz (destroyed)

    The smallest and, being above-ground, the softest target of the three enrichment plants. Long a research and development centre, it used fewer centrifuges than the other plants, often connected in smaller clusters of machines known as cascades.

    It did, however, have two interconnected, full-size cascades of up to 164 advanced centrifuges each, enriching uranium to up to 60%. Apart from that, there were only up to 201 centrifuges operating at the PFEP enriching to up to 2%.

    Most of the research and development work attributed to the PFEP had recently been moved underground to the FEP, where more than 1,000 of its advanced centrifuges were enriching to up to 5%.

    The PFEP was destroyed in the Israeli attack, Grossi said.

    * The Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant (no visible damage)

    Iran's most deeply buried enrichment site, dug into a mountain, suffered no visible damage, Grossi reiterated on Monday.

    While it has only about 2,000 centrifuges in operation, it produces the vast majority of Iran's uranium enriched to up to 60%, using roughly the same number of centrifuges as the PFEP did, because it feeds uranium enriched to up to 20% into those cascades compared to 5% at the PFEP.

    Fordow therefore produced 166.6 kg of uranium enriched to up to 60% in the most recent quarter. According to an IAEA yardstick, that is enough in principle, if enriched further, for just under four nuclear weapons, compared to the PFEP's 19.2 kg, less than half a bomb's worth.

    OTHER FACILITIES

    Israeli strikes damaged four buildings at the nuclear complex at Isfahan, the IAEA has said, including the Uranium Conversion Facility (UCF) and facilities where work on uranium metal was conducted.

    While it has other uses, mastering uranium metal technology is an important step in making the core of a nuclear weapon. If Iran were to try to make a nuclear weapon, it would need to take weapons-grade uranium and turn it into uranium metal.

    Uranium conversion is the process by which "yellowcake" uranium is turned into uranium hexafluoride, the feedstock for centrifuges, so that it can be enriched. If the UCF is out of use, Iran will eventually run out of uranium to enrich unless it finds an outside source of uranium hexafluoride.

    SCIENTISTS

    At least 14 Iranian nuclear scientists have been killed in Israeli attacks since Friday, including in car bombs, two sources in the Gulf said on Sunday.

    Israel's armed forces named nine of them on Saturday, saying they "played a central part of the progress toward nuclear weapons" and that "their elimination represents a significant blow to the Iranian regime's ability to acquire weapons of mass destruction". That assertion could not immediately be verified.

    Western powers have often said Iran's nuclear advances provide it with an "irreversible knowledge gain", suggesting that while losing experts or facilities may slow progress, the advances are permanent.

    URANIUM STOCKPILE

    Iran has a large stock of uranium enriched to different levels.

    As of May 17, Iran was estimated to have enough uranium enriched to up to 60% for it to make nine nuclear weapons, according to an IAEA yardstick.

    At lower enrichment levels it has enough for more bombs, though it would take more effort: enough enriched to up to 20% for two more, and enough enriched to up to 5% for 11 more.

    Much of Iran's most highly enriched uranium stockpile is stored at Isfahan under IAEA seal, officials have said. The IAEA does not report where it is stored, nor has it said whether it was affected by the strikes.

    OPEN QUESTIONS

    * How will Iran respond?

    Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi told state TV on Saturday Iran would take measures to protect nuclear materials and equipment that would not be notified to the IAEA and it would no longer cooperate with the IAEA as before.

    Lawmakers are also preparing a bill that could prompt Iran to pull out of the NPT, following in the footsteps of North Korea, which announced its withdrawal in 2003 and went on to test nuclear weapons.

    The IAEA does not know how many centrifuges Iran has outside its enrichment plants. Any further reduction in cooperation with the IAEA could increase speculation that it will or has set up a secret enrichment plant using some of that supply.

    Existing centrifuge cascades can also be reconfigured to enrich to a different purity level within a week, officials have said.

    * What is the status of the uranium stock?

    If Iran can no longer convert, its existing stock of uranium hexafluoride and enriched uranium becomes even more important.

    * How bad is the damage?

    The IAEA has not yet been able to carry out inspections to assess the damage there in detail.

    * Will there be more attacks?

    Soon after the attacks started on Friday, U.S. President Donald Trump urged Iran to make a deal with the United States to impose fresh restrictions on its nuclear programme "before there is nothing left". Talks scheduled for June 15 were called off.

    (Reporting by Francois Murphy, Editing by Timothy Heritage)

    Key Takeaways

    • •Israeli strikes targeted key Iranian nuclear facilities.
    • •Natanz's power supply was severely damaged.
    • •PFEP at Natanz was completely destroyed.
    • •Fordow facility remained undamaged.
    • •IAEA reports significant uranium enrichment concerns.

    Frequently Asked Questions about Explainer-How much damage have Israeli strikes caused to Iran's nuclear programme?

    1What damage has been reported at Iran's enrichment plants?

    The Israeli strikes have damaged the Fuel Enrichment Plant at Natanz, destroying its electricity infrastructure, and completely destroyed the Pilot Fuel Enrichment Plant. The Fordow facility, however, reportedly suffered no visible damage.

    2How many Iranian nuclear scientists have been killed?

    At least 14 Iranian nuclear scientists have been reported killed in Israeli attacks, with nine identified by Israel's armed forces as key figures in Iran's nuclear weapons progress.

    3What is the current status of Iran's uranium stockpile?

    As of May 17, Iran has enough uranium enriched to up to 60% for the potential creation of nine nuclear weapons, with additional stock at lower enrichment levels that could produce more bombs.

    4What measures is Iran considering in response to the attacks?

    Iran's Deputy Foreign Minister indicated that the country would take measures to protect its nuclear materials and equipment without notifying the IAEA, and lawmakers are preparing a bill that could lead Iran to withdraw from the NPT.

    5What has the IAEA said about the damage assessment?

    The IAEA has not yet conducted inspections to assess the damage in detail, leaving the extent of the impact from the strikes unclear.

    More from Headlines

    Explore more articles in the Headlines category

    Image for Pope Leo names Australian bishop to lead Vatican's legal office
    Pope Leo Names Australian Bishop to Lead Vatican's Legal Office
    Image for Russia says it supplies fuel to Cuba as humanitarian aid
    Russia Says It Supplies Fuel to Cuba as Humanitarian Aid
    Image for Iranian strikes pose ‘existential threat’, Gulf states tell UN
    Iranian Strikes Pose ‘existential Threat’, Gulf States Tell UN
    Image for Russia says it remains in contact with US on Ukraine settlement
    Russia Says It Remains in Contact With US on Ukraine Settlement
    Image for Putin allies Lukashenko and Kim meet in North Korea
    Putin Allies Lukashenko and Kim Meet in North Korea
    Image for Denmark's Frederiksen faces tough coalition talks to remain prime minister
    Denmark's Frederiksen Faces Tough Coalition Talks to Remain Prime Minister
    Image for UK police arrest two men over arson attack on Jewish community ambulances
    UK Police Arrest Two Men Over Arson Attack on Jewish Community Ambulances
    Image for Cricket-Bairstow joins Livingstone in criticising level of care in England set-up
    Cricket-Bairstow Joins Livingstone in Criticising Level of Care in England Set-Up
    Image for Mullally to be installed as first female Archbishop of Canterbury
    Mullally to Be Installed as First Female Archbishop of Canterbury
    Image for Cyprus seeks new security deal for UK bases, Telegraph reports
    Cyprus Seeks New Security Deal for UK Bases, Telegraph Reports
    Image for British army veteran completes record 100km Land Rover pull
    British Army Veteran Completes Record 100km Land Rover Pull
    Image for Pope Leo laments that Iran war 'getting worse and worse'
    Pope Leo Laments That Iran War 'getting Worse and Worse'
    View All Headlines Posts
    Previous Headlines PostDutch Court Confirms Apple Abused Dominant Position in Dating Apps
    Next Headlines PostFactbox-What Is the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty?