Search
00
GBAF Logo
trophy
Top StoriesInterviewsBusinessFinanceBankingTechnologyInvestingTradingVideosAwardsMagazinesHeadlinesTrends

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest news and updates from our team.

Global Banking & Finance Review®

Global Banking & Finance Review® - Subscribe to our newsletter

Company

    GBAF Logo
    • About Us
    • Advertising and Sponsorship
    • Profile & Readership
    • Contact Us
    • Latest News
    • Privacy & Cookies Policies
    • Terms of Use
    • Advertising Terms
    • Issue 81
    • Issue 80
    • Issue 79
    • Issue 78
    • Issue 77
    • Issue 76
    • Issue 75
    • Issue 74
    • Issue 73
    • Issue 72
    • Issue 71
    • Issue 70
    • View All
    • About the Awards
    • Awards Timetable
    • Awards Winners
    • Submit Nominations
    • Testimonials
    • Media Room
    • FAQ
    • Asset Management Awards
    • Brand of the Year Awards
    • Business Awards
    • Cash Management Banking Awards
    • Banking Technology Awards
    • CEO Awards
    • Customer Service Awards
    • CSR Awards
    • Deal of the Year Awards
    • Corporate Governance Awards
    • Corporate Banking Awards
    • Digital Transformation Awards
    • Fintech Awards
    • Education & Training Awards
    • ESG & Sustainability Awards
    • ESG Awards
    • Forex Banking Awards
    • Innovation Awards
    • Insurance & Takaful Awards
    • Investment Banking Awards
    • Investor Relations Awards
    • Leadership Awards
    • Islamic Banking Awards
    • Real Estate Awards
    • Project Finance Awards
    • Process & Product Awards
    • Telecommunication Awards
    • HR & Recruitment Awards
    • Trade Finance Awards
    • The Next 100 Global Awards
    • Wealth Management Awards
    • Travel Awards
    • Years of Excellence Awards
    • Publishing Principles
    • Ownership & Funding
    • Corrections Policy
    • Editorial Code of Ethics
    • Diversity & Inclusion Policy
    • Fact Checking Policy
    Original content: Global Banking and Finance Review - https://www.globalbankingandfinance.com

    A global financial intelligence and recognition platform delivering authoritative insights, data-driven analysis, and institutional benchmarking across Banking, Capital Markets, Investment, Technology, and Financial Infrastructure.

    Copyright © 2010-2026 - All Rights Reserved. | Sitemap | Tags

    Editorial & Advertiser disclosure

    Global Banking & Finance Review® is an online platform offering news, analysis, and opinion on the latest trends, developments, and innovations in the banking and finance industry worldwide. The platform covers a diverse range of topics, including banking, insurance, investment, wealth management, fintech, and regulatory issues. The website publishes news, press releases, opinion and advertorials on various financial organizations, products and services which are commissioned from various Companies, Organizations, PR agencies, Bloggers etc. These commissioned articles are commercial in nature. This is not to be considered as financial advice and should be considered only for information purposes. It does not reflect the views or opinion of our website and is not to be considered an endorsement or a recommendation. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any information provided with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek Professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. We link to various third-party websites, affiliate sales networks, and to our advertising partners websites. When you view or click on certain links available on our articles, our partners may compensate us for displaying the content to you or make a purchase or fill a form. This will not incur any additional charges to you. To make things simpler for you to identity or distinguish advertised or sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles or links hosted on our site as a commercial article placement. We will not be responsible for any loss you may suffer as a result of any omission or inaccuracy on the website.

    1. Home
    2. >Headlines
    3. >Explainer-Germany's new debt settlement, and where it could still go wrong
    Headlines

    Explainer-Germany's New Debt Settlement, and Where It Could Still Go Wrong

    Published by Global Banking & Finance Review®

    Posted on March 7, 2025

    5 min read

    Last updated: January 25, 2026

    Add as preferred source on Google
    Explainer-Germany's new debt settlement, and where it could still go wrong - Headlines news and analysis from Global Banking & Finance Review
    Why waste money on news and opinion when you can access them for free?

    Take advantage of our newsletter subscription and stay informed on the go!

    Subscribe

    Tags:GDPdebt sustainabilityfinancial marketspublic policyinfrastructure financing

    Quick Summary

    Germany's coalition agrees on a new fiscal policy, exempting security spending from the debt cap and creating a 500 billion euro fund. Legal challenges may arise.

    Germany's Fiscal Policy Shift: Key Agreements and Potential Pitfalls

    By Thomas Escritt

    BERLIN (Reuters) -Germany's conservative leader and would-be next chancellor Friedrich Merz has agreed what amounts to a fiscal policy sea-change with support from the Social Democrats (SPD), his likely coalition partner and the Greens.

    What have they agreed, and what could still go wrong?

    WHAT HAVE THE THREE PARTIES AGREED?

    After marathon talks, Merz's conservative bloc, the SPD and the Greens agreed to exempt security spending, very broadly construed, above 1% of economic output from the constitutional "debt brake" spending cap.

    Spending on civil defence, IT security and "aid to states attacked in violation of international law" - a clear reference to Ukraine - will count as defence spending, meaning that in theory Germany can borrow unlimited sums to finance them.

    They also agreed to create an off-balance-sheet special fund worth 500 billion euros ($543 billion) to finance infrastructure, of which 100 billion euros will be spent by the governments of Germany's 16 states. In addition, states will themselves be allowed to borrow up to 0.35% of GDP above the debt brake - giving them some 16 billion euros in spending room.

    A further 100 billion euros from the fund will be used to stock up a climate and transformation fund that was created by the Greens when they were in charge of climate policy in Chancellor Olaf Scholz's outgoing government.

    HOW WERE THE GREENS WON OVER?

    Just a day before Merz announced the agreement, the Greens were signalling they might not back the conservatives' and SPD's plans for boosting defence spending, saying they were concerned about the haste with which it was being passed and were worried the money would be frittered away on tax cuts.

    The creation of some 116 billion euros in spending money for the states is a significant win for the Greens, since they are in government in seven of the 16 states.

    The climate money is also important for a party that has made climate change mitigation a central pillar of its policy platform.

    DOES MERZ HAVE THE VOTES?

    Both measures need the support of two thirds of the Bundestag, the German parliament. In the old Bundestag, which is still in session, the combined votes of the conservatives, the SPD and the Greens clear that threshold with 30 votes to spare.

    That buffer is important, given the possibility of ill or dissenting members in the 733-member parliament.

    Merz spent the election campaign promising not to open the spending taps only to announce a tectonic shift in German fiscal policy days after winning. Some legislators in his Christian Democrat (CDU) party and its Bavarian CSU allies may feel that is too sharp a U-turn, or that the SPD, the junior party in the planned coalition, has been given too much leeway.

    Merz said on Friday he was confident the deal would pass.

    COULD LEGAL CHALLENGES SINK THE PACKAGE?

    The measures, which include constitutional amendments, will be passed by the old Bundestag. Once the new lower house elected on February 23 is seated, the conservative-SPD-Green caucus would no longer suffice for two thirds, giving the military-sceptic Left party the power to block it.

    Both the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) and the Left party, which gained most in February's national election, have launched urgent legal challenges against what they say is a manoeuvre to thwart the will of a parliament elected less than two weeks ago.

    Germany's powerful Constitutional Court has a history of overriding government decisions, including in core matters of budgetary policy.

    The Court's scepticism about special funds of the kind now planned paved the way for the fall of Chancellor Olaf Scholz's government and the February early election that he lost.

    Judges may also feel that squeezing the legislation into the period before the new Bundestag is seated is democratically questionable - as some lawmakers and legal experts also argue - or gives legislators too little time to debate the measures.

    Marco Buschmann, FDP justice minister in Scholz's collapsed government, has said he regards the proposed measures, even if passed by the outgoing parliament, as legally sound. Most experts agree with him.

    THE UPPER HOUSE IS THE FINAL HURDLE

    The Bundesrat, Germany's upper house, represents the governments of the 16 states that make up the federation.

    The states, which for years have complained that they bear the brunt of Germany's fiscal squeeze, have every incentive to pass the loosening package, since they will be among its major beneficiaries.

    But the conservatives, SPD and Greens still need the backing of one more party for it to pass the Bundesrat: that could be the Left, its populist splinter the Sahra Wagenknecht Alliance (BSW), the FDP or the Bavarian Free Voters party.

    The AfD is not an issue here, since it does not serve in a state government, and the Bundesrat represents governments, not voters.

    The BSW, Kremlin-friendly in its rhetoric, would be unlikely to back measures to increase defence spending, and the Left is also opposed to defence spending. The FDP, pro-Ukraine and pro-military spending, dislikes excessive borrowing.

    That means Bavaria's Free Voters, sticklers for fiscal discipline from Germany's wealthiest region, are likely to play a crucial role. They have declined to commit so far, but many analysts think they could be persuaded with the right offer. 

    ($1 = 0.9207 euros)

    (Reporting by Thomas Escritt; editing by Matthias Williams, Toby Chopra, Aidan Lewis)

    Key Takeaways

    • •Germany's coalition agrees to exempt security spending from debt cap.
    • •A special fund of 500 billion euros will finance infrastructure.
    • •The Greens secured climate fund allocations.
    • •The agreement requires two-thirds Bundestag support.
    • •Legal challenges may threaten the fiscal package.

    Frequently Asked Questions about Explainer-Germany's new debt settlement, and where it could still go wrong

    1What fiscal policy change has Germany agreed upon?

    Germany's conservative leader Friedrich Merz, along with the SPD and Greens, agreed to exempt security spending above 1% of economic output from the constitutional 'debt brake' spending limits.

    2
    What is the significance of the 500 billion euro fund?

    The fund is intended to finance infrastructure projects, with 100 billion euros allocated for immediate use by the governments of Germany's states, marking a significant financial commitment.

    3What challenges could affect the passage of these measures?

    Legal challenges from the AfD and the Left party could hinder the measures, as they argue that the proposed changes are a maneuver to bypass democratic processes.

    4How does the Bundesrat play a role in this agreement?

    The Bundesrat, representing the governments of the 16 states, must approve the measures, and the conservatives, SPD, and Greens need additional support from other parties to ensure passage.

    5What concerns did the Greens have before agreeing?

    The Greens expressed concerns about the implications of increased defense spending but were ultimately won over by the significant financial commitments for climate initiatives and state funding.

    More from Headlines

    Explore more articles in the Headlines category

    Image for North Korea's Kim Jong Un welcomed Belarus President Lukashenko to Pyongyang, KCNA says
    North Korea's Kim Jong Un Welcomed Belarus President Lukashenko to Pyongyang, Kcna Says
    Image for Ukrainian drones kill two in Russian border region of Belgorod, governor says
    Ukrainian Drones Kill Two in Russian Border Region of Belgorod, Governor Says
    Image for Iran wants Lebanon included in any ceasefire, sources say
    Iran Wants Lebanon Included in Any Ceasefire, Sources Say
    Image for Vance due to visit Hungary on April 7-8 ahead of key election, say sources
    Vance Due to Visit Hungary on April 7-8 Ahead of Key Election, Say Sources
    Image for Belgian police break up migrant smuggling network, four people arrested
    Belgian Police Break up Migrant Smuggling Network, Four People Arrested
    Image for Russia sought to blackmail US using intelligence to Iran, Zelenskiy says
    Russia Sought to Blackmail US Using Intelligence to Iran, Zelenskiy Says
    Image for Italy's tourism minister resigns, ending standoff with PM Meloni
    Italy's Tourism Minister Resigns, Ending Standoff With PM Meloni
    Image for In Lebanon, paramedics mourn their own killed in Israeli strike
    In Lebanon, Paramedics Mourn Their Own Killed in Israeli Strike
    Image for Italy tourism minister resigns, obeying PM Meloni
    Italy Tourism Minister Resigns, Obeying PM Meloni
    Image for Swiss prosecutors not involved with Paris probe at bank Edmond de Rothschild
    Swiss Prosecutors Not Involved With Paris Probe at Bank Edmond De Rothschild
    Image for Lost remains of French musketeer d'Artagnan may have been found in Dutch church
    Lost Remains of French Musketeer d'Artagnan May Have Been Found in Dutch Church
    Image for Doctors in England plan six-day strike after government pay offer rejected
    Doctors in England Plan Six-Day Strike After Government Pay Offer Rejected
    View All Headlines Posts
    Previous Headlines PostUkraine's Naftogaz and Poland's Orlen to Cooperate in Lng
    Next Headlines PostBosnia's Top Court Temporarily Suspends Serb Region's Separatist Laws