Editorial & Advertiser disclosure

Global Banking and Finance Review is an online platform offering news, analysis, and opinion on the latest trends, developments, and innovations in the banking and finance industry worldwide. The platform covers a diverse range of topics, including banking, insurance, investment, wealth management, fintech, and regulatory issues. The website publishes news, press releases, opinion and advertorials on various financial organizations, products and services which are commissioned from various Companies, Organizations, PR agencies, Bloggers etc. These commissioned articles are commercial in nature. This is not to be considered as financial advice and should be considered only for information purposes. It does not reflect the views or opinion of our website and is not to be considered an endorsement or a recommendation. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any information provided with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek Professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. We link to various third-party websites, affiliate sales networks, and to our advertising partners websites. When you view or click on certain links available on our articles, our partners may compensate us for displaying the content to you or make a purchase or fill a form. This will not incur any additional charges to you. To make things simpler for you to identity or distinguish advertised or sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles or links hosted on our site as a commercial article placement. We will not be responsible for any loss you may suffer as a result of any omission or inaccuracy on the website.

Home > Finance > UK rings in regulatory changes follow death of old tripartite structure

UK rings in regulatory changes follow death of old tripartite structure

Published by Gbaf News

Posted on May 22, 2013

5 min read

Last updated: January 22, 2026

Regulatory changes in UK finance following the tripartite structure's demise - Global Banking & Finance Review — This image illustrates the regulatory landscape of UK finance, highlighting the shift from the tripartite structure to the new Financial Conduct Authority and Prudential Regulation Authority frameworks, following the FSA 2012 reforms.

Dossa Mebs The financial crisis has powerfully demonstrated the need for a new approach to financial regulation. Major reforms are therefore under way, aiming to establish a UK financial regulatory framework which is more focused on the issues that matter and better equipped to deliver financial stability.

Following the financial crises of 2008 which gripped the UK, the so-called tripartite structure of the Financial Services Authority (“FSA”), Treasury and Bank of England (“BoE”), was blamed for being “asleep at the wheel”. The crisis powerfully demonstrated the need for a new approach to financial regulation. The Financial Services Act 2012 (“FSA 2012”) was enacted as the primary legislation relating to the UK Government’s reforms of the UK financial services regulatory structure.

The changes introduced by the FSA 2012 resulted in the abolition of the FSA on 1 April 2013, and a majority of its functions were transferred to two new regulators: the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) and the PrudentialRegulation Authority (“PRA”). On the same date, the Bank of England (“BoE”) took over the FSA’s responsibilities for financial market infrastructures (“FMIs”) and the Financial Policy Committee (“FPC”) was established on a statutory basis. In addition to creating new regulators, the UK Government has also made other significant changes to aspects of financial services regulation.

The FSA 2012 made extensive changes to the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (“FSMA”) as well as to the Bank of England Act 1998 and the Banking Act 2009. Although the majority of the FSA 2012’s provisions relate to amendments to other primary legislation, it also contains provisions for mutual societies, collaboration between Treasury and BoE, FCA or PRA, investigation of complaints against regulators and offences relating to financial services.
The roles of the new regulators created by FSA 2012 are set out below:

(a) Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)
The FCA inherited the majority of the FSA’s roles and functions and also adopted the legal corporate identity of the FSA. The FCA:

Is responsible for the conduct of business regulation of all firms, including those regulated for prudential matters by the PRA.
Is responsible for the prudential regulation of firms not regulated by the PRA.
Inherited the FSA’s market conduct regulatory functions, with the exception of responsibility for systemically important infrastructure which was transferred to the BoE.
The FCA has a strategic objective and three operational objectives:
The strategic objective is to ensure that the “relevant markets” function well.
The operational objectives are:
- to secure an appropriate degree of protection for consumers;
- to protect and enhance the integrity of the UK financial system; and
- to promote effective competition in the interests of consumers.

The FCA is also obliged to discharge its general functions in a way that promotes competition.

(b) Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA)
The PRA, a subsidiary of the BoE, is responsible for micro-prudential regulation of systemically important firms, including banks, insurers and certain investment firms. These firms are referred to as PRA-authorised firms and also as dual-regulated firms because, while the PRA regulates prudential issues, the FCA acts as these firms’ conduct regulator.

The PRA has operational independence from the BoE, and the FPC, for day-to-day regulation and supervision of PRA-authorised firms. Its focus is on setting institution-specific capital requirements.

The PRA has a general objective: to promote the safety and soundness of regulated firms.

The PRA is likely to try to meet this objective primarily by seeking to minimise any adverse effects of firm failure on the UK financial system and by ensuring that firms carry on their business in a way that avoids adverse effects on the system.

The PRA’s board includes the Governor of the BoE as chairman and the BoE Deputy Governor for prudential regulation as chief executive. The FCA chairman also sits on the PRA board.

(c) Financial Policy Committee (FPC)
The FPC is a committee of the Court of Directors of the BoE responsible for macro-prudential regulation. This means that it considers prudential regulation issues across the UK financial system, in contrast to the PRA’s micro-prudential role, which is focused on the supervision of individual firms. Unlike the PRA and the FCA, the FPC does not have direct regulatory responsibility for any particular types of firm.

The FPC’s objective is to contribute to the BoE’s achievement of its financial stability objective under the Banking Act 2009 by identifying, monitoring and taking action to remove or reduce systemic risks. For these purposes a “systemic risk” is a risk to the stability of the UK financial system as a whole or to a significant part of that system.

The FSA was created in the late 1990s by combining a number of regulatory authorities. The new regulatory framework has, to some extent, reversed this process. Whether the new regulatory framework will achieve its intended purpose only time will tell. In the meantime, regulated businesses will have to manage any disruption caused by the implementation of the new framework, especially PRA-authorised firms which will have to adapt to supervision by two regulators.

Mehboob Dossa is a partner in the Corporate Department at international law firm, McGuireWoods. He is head of the London office’s equity capital markets group. Mehboob can be contacted at mdossa@mcguirewoods.com.