Search
00
GBAF Logo
trophy
Top StoriesInterviewsBusinessFinanceBankingTechnologyInvestingTradingVideosAwardsMagazinesHeadlinesTrends

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest news and updates from our team.

Global Banking and Finance Review

Company

    GBAF Logo
    • About Us
    • Profile
    • Privacy & Cookie Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
    • Advertising
    • Submit Post
    • Latest News
    • Research Reports
    • Press Release
    • Awards▾
      • About the Awards
      • Awards TimeTable
      • Submit Nominations
      • Testimonials
      • Media Room
      • Award Winners
      • FAQ
    • Magazines▾
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 79
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 78
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 77
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 76
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 75
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 73
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 71
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 70
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 69
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 66
    Top StoriesInterviewsBusinessFinanceBankingTechnologyInvestingTradingVideosAwardsMagazinesHeadlinesTrends

    Global Banking & Finance Review® is a leading financial portal and online magazine offering News, Analysis, Opinion, Reviews, Interviews & Videos from the world of Banking, Finance, Business, Trading, Technology, Investing, Brokerage, Foreign Exchange, Tax & Legal, Islamic Finance, Asset & Wealth Management.
    Copyright © 2010-2026 GBAF Publications Ltd - All Rights Reserved. | Sitemap | Tags

    Editorial & Advertiser disclosure

    Global Banking and Finance Review is an online platform offering news, analysis, and opinion on the latest trends, developments, and innovations in the banking and finance industry worldwide. The platform covers a diverse range of topics, including banking, insurance, investment, wealth management, fintech, and regulatory issues. The website publishes news, press releases, opinion and advertorials on various financial organizations, products and services which are commissioned from various Companies, Organizations, PR agencies, Bloggers etc. These commissioned articles are commercial in nature. This is not to be considered as financial advice and should be considered only for information purposes. It does not reflect the views or opinion of our website and is not to be considered an endorsement or a recommendation. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any information provided with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek Professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. We link to various third-party websites, affiliate sales networks, and to our advertising partners websites. When you view or click on certain links available on our articles, our partners may compensate us for displaying the content to you or make a purchase or fill a form. This will not incur any additional charges to you. To make things simpler for you to identity or distinguish advertised or sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles or links hosted on our site as a commercial article placement. We will not be responsible for any loss you may suffer as a result of any omission or inaccuracy on the website.

    Home > Headlines > NATO veterans say Trump 'crossed red line' questioning their Afghan service
    Headlines
    NATO veterans say Trump 'crossed red line' questioning their Afghan service

    Published by Global Banking and Finance Review

    Posted on January 23, 2026

    3 min read

    Last updated: January 23, 2026

    The image showcases the Christophe De Margerie tanker docking at Russia's Arctic LNG 2, highlighting ongoing LNG export challenges amidst U.S. sanctions.
    Fourth sanctioned LNG tanker, Christophe De Margerie, at Russia's Arctic LNG 2 plant - Global Banking & Finance Review
    Tags:Presidentinternational financial institutionfinancial communityfinancial marketspolitical risk insurance

    Quick Summary

    UK minister criticizes Trump's NATO comments as disappointing, highlighting European military sacrifices and NATO's role post-9/11.

    Table of Contents

    • Veterans' Reactions to Trump's Statements
    • Political Backlash
    • Historical Context of NATO
    • Personal Sacrifices of Troops

    NATO Veterans Respond to Trump's Claims About Afghan Service

    Veterans' Reactions to Trump's Statements

    By Sam Tabahriti

    Political Backlash

    LONDON, Jan 23 (Reuters) - Veterans from across Europe hit back at U.S. President Donald Trump's suggestion that they had stayed off the front lines in Afghanistan, saying on Friday that hundreds of their comrades had died fighting alongside American forces.

    Historical Context of NATO

    Senior politicians joined the criticism, with the British Prime Minister's office saying Trump had been "wrong to diminish the role of NATO troops" during two decades of war.

    Personal Sacrifices of Troops

    Trump told Fox News on Thursday the United States had "never needed" the transatlantic alliance and accused allies of staying "a little off the front lines" in Afghanistan.

    'WE PAID IN BLOOD FOR THIS ALLIANCE'

    "We expect an apology for this statement," Roman Polko, a retired Polish general and former special forces commander who served in Afghanistan and Iraq, told Reuters in an interview.

    Trump had "crossed a red line," he added. "We paid with blood for this alliance. We truly sacrificed our own lives."

    Britain's veterans minister, Alistair Carns, whose own military service included five tours including alongside American troops in Afghanistan, called Trump's claims "utterly ridiculous".

    "We shed blood, sweat and tears together. Not everybody came home," he said in a video posted on X.

    Richard Moore, the former head of Britain’s MI6 intelligence service, said he, like many MI6 officers, had operated in dangerous environments with “brave and highly esteemed” CIA counterparts and had been proud to do so with Britain’s closest ally.

    Under NATO's founding treaty, members are bound by a collective-defence clause, Article 5, which treats an attack on one member as an attack on all.

    It has been invoked only once - after the September 11, 2001 attacks on New York and Washington. European allies responded by joining the U.S.-led mission in Afghanistan.

    POLISH SACRIFICE 'MUST NOT BE DIMINISHED'

    Some politicians noted that Trump had avoided the draft for the Vietnam War, citing bone spurs in his feet.

    "Trump avoided military service 5 times," Ed Davey, leader of Britain's centrist Liberal Democrats, wrote on X. "How dare he question their sacrifice."

    Poland's sacrifice "will never be forgotten and must not be diminished", Defence Minister Wladyslaw Kosiniak-Kamysz said.

    Poland is a reliable and proven ally, and nothing will change that," he said on X.

    Trump's comments were "ignorant", said Rasmus Jarlov, an opposition Conservative Party member of Denmark's parliament.

    British defence minister John Healey said the United States had relied on that solidarity and the British troops who served during the 20-year campaign should be remembered as "heroes who gave their lives in service of our nation".

    The United States lost about 2,460 troops in Afghanistan, according to the U.S. Department of Defense. A total of 457 British military personnel were killed from the more than 150,000 who were deployed.

    More than 150 Canadians were also killed along with 90 French service personnel, while Denmark - which has been under heavy pressure from Trump to sell its semi-autonomous region of Greenland to the U.S. - lost 44 troops, one of NATO's highest per-capita death rates.

    (Reporting by Sam Tabahriti in London, Stine Jacobsen in Copenhagen and Terje Solsvik in Oslo, Malgorzata Wojtunik in Gdansk, additional reporting by Andrew MacAskill; Writing by Sam Tabahriti; editing by Gareth Jones and Andrew Heavens)

    Key Takeaways

    • •Trump criticized NATO's role in Afghanistan.
    • •UK minister found Trump's comments disappointing.
    • •European soldiers' sacrifices were highlighted.
    • •NATO's collective-defense clause was invoked post-9/11.
    • •Trump's military service avoidance was noted.

    Frequently Asked Questions about NATO veterans say Trump 'crossed red line' questioning their Afghan service

    1What is Article 5?

    Article 5 of the NATO treaty states that an armed attack against one or more NATO members is considered an attack against all members, prompting collective defense.

    Why waste money on news and opinion when you can access them for free?

    Take advantage of our newsletter subscription and stay informed on the go!

    Subscribe

    More from Headlines

    Explore more articles in the Headlines category

    Alpine skiing-British veteran Ryding ready for final Olympic bid
    EU to suspend 93 billion euro retaliatory trade package against US for 6 months
    Largest European pension fund ABP cut back US Treasury holdings last year
    Novo's Wegovy pill tracks 18,410 prescriptions for first full week since launch
    Exclusive-Seeking to boost UK economy, finance minister Reeves to accompany Starmer on China visit
    France probes link between two baby deaths and milk formula
    Stars of fashion and film bid farewell to haute couture 'emperor' Valentino
    US, Kazakhstan energy ministries discuss cooperation
    Europe commits to wind energy expansion despite Trump criticism, draft shows
    World order changing, not rupturing, finance chiefs say
    Analysis-Greenland galvanizes Europe to confront new US reality
    UBS explores crypto investing for select private banking clients, Bloomberg News reports
    View All Headlines Posts
    Previous Headlines PostUS Commerce-assisted foreign contracts jump to $244 billion in 2025 on Boeing order gains
    Next Headlines PostUK's Royal Navy tracks Russian vessels sailing through English Channel