Editorial & Advertiser Disclosure Global Banking And Finance Review is an independent publisher which offers News, information, Analysis, Opinion, Press Releases, Reviews, Research reports covering various economies, industries, products, services and companies. The content available on globalbankingandfinance.com is sourced by a mixture of different methods which is not limited to content produced and supplied by various staff writers, journalists, freelancers, individuals, organizations, companies, PR agencies Sponsored Posts etc. The information available on this website is purely for educational and informational purposes only. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any of the information provided at globalbankingandfinance.com with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. Globalbankingandfinance.com also links to various third party websites and we cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of the information provided by third party websites. Links from various articles on our site to third party websites are a mixture of non-sponsored links and sponsored links. Only a very small fraction of the links which point to external websites are affiliate links. Some of the links which you may click on our website may link to various products and services from our partners who may compensate us if you buy a service or product or fill a form or install an app. This will not incur additional cost to you. A very few articles on our website are sponsored posts or paid advertorials. These are marked as sponsored posts at the bottom of each post. For avoidance of any doubts and to make it easier for you to differentiate sponsored or non-sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles on our site or all links to external websites as sponsored . Please note that some of the services or products which we talk about carry a high level of risk and may not be suitable for everyone. These may be complex services or products and we request the readers to consider this purely from an educational standpoint. The information provided on this website is general in nature. Global Banking & Finance Review expressly disclaims any liability without any limitation which may arise directly or indirectly from the use of such information.


  • Two-thirds of Employee Benefit Consultants believe limiting email access will improve employee mental health
  • More than half of consultants say employees will be more engaged and productivity will increase                                                                      

The ‘always-on’ culture where employees have 24/7 access to email could be negatively impacting mental health as well as a range of other performance indicators from productivity, employee engagement and morale, new research1 from MetLife Employee Benefits shows.

Its study found two out of three Employee Benefits Consultants (EBCs) said that initiatives that limit employee access to work emails outside of traditional working hours would improve employee mental health.

Over half of EBCs (55%) also cited that limiting email access would result in a more engaged workforce and 50% believe that limiting email access would lead to productivity improvements.

What is more, nearly two-thirds (61%) believe that curtailing the use of out of hours work emails could lead to better employee morale with just 9% saying limits would hit morale and just 6% saying it would result in staff leaving an employer.

Adrian Matthews, Employee Benefits Director, MetLife UK said: “There is a creeping acceptance that employees are expected to be on call 24/7, available to respond to any and every minor query.

“But the ‘always-on’ work culture could be an invisible handbrake on growth and likewise be impacting wellness, denying individuals to access the ‘off button’ by putting them on a permanent state of reactive alert.

“EBCs are right to identify the positives of limiting access to email to promote better mental health, employee engagement, morale and ultimately productivity improvements.”

A report2by the Chartered Management Institute found the majority of UK managers spent an extra 29 days annually working outside office hours, more than cancelling out their annual holiday entitlement.

Matthews continued, “In our conversations with EBCs and in partnership with our corporate clients, it’s clear that organisations are starting to address the perils of the always-on culture and measures under consideration include developing rules banning internal e-mails after 7pm and at weekends; compulsory email-free holidays where an employer shuts down their email servers out of hours or automatically deletes emails when staff are on holiday.. However, staff will only change their behaviours after guidance from those line managers and team leaders who recognise the potential pitfalls of the always-on culture.”

MetLife’s research also shows that nearly two-thirds (61%) of EBCs believe that placing limits on working hours will become one of the greatest priorities regarding employee health and wellness within the next two years.

MetLife’s Group Income Protection includes a Wellbeing Hub offering confidential health and wellness services and tailored data insight reports to help pinpoint potential risks and issues with employee health and wellness. Line managers can access dedicated support to enable them to address day-to-day workplace challenges.

MetLife is established as the UK’s third largest Group Life provider by the number of schemes it insures3 and the fourth largest Group Income provider. It has generated significant market momentum through its relentless focus on customer needs, innovative propositions, a culture of continuous improvement. and a commitment to building strong partnerships.