Editorial & Advertiser Disclosure Global Banking And Finance Review is an independent publisher which offers News, information, Analysis, Opinion, Press Releases, Reviews, Research reports covering various economies, industries, products, services and companies. The content available on globalbankingandfinance.com is sourced by a mixture of different methods which is not limited to content produced and supplied by various staff writers, journalists, freelancers, individuals, organizations, companies, PR agencies Sponsored Posts etc. The information available on this website is purely for educational and informational purposes only. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any of the information provided at globalbankingandfinance.com with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. Globalbankingandfinance.com also links to various third party websites and we cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of the information provided by third party websites. Links from various articles on our site to third party websites are a mixture of non-sponsored links and sponsored links. Only a very small fraction of the links which point to external websites are affiliate links. Some of the links which you may click on our website may link to various products and services from our partners who may compensate us if you buy a service or product or fill a form or install an app. This will not incur additional cost to you. A very few articles on our website are sponsored posts or paid advertorials. These are marked as sponsored posts at the bottom of each post. For avoidance of any doubts and to make it easier for you to differentiate sponsored or non-sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles on our site or all links to external websites as sponsored . Please note that some of the services or products which we talk about carry a high level of risk and may not be suitable for everyone. These may be complex services or products and we request the readers to consider this purely from an educational standpoint. The information provided on this website is general in nature. Global Banking & Finance Review expressly disclaims any liability without any limitation which may arise directly or indirectly from the use of such information.


Two depreciation methods help to increase cash flow

Recently we looked at how Australian property investors can improve the cash flow earned from an investment property by claiming depreciation.

In Australia, depreciation can be claimed on investment properties as capital works deductions for the wear and tear of the structure of the building (eg. walls, floors, roofs) as well as for the removable or mechanical plant and equipment assets (eg, carpets, blinds, furniture, ovens, hot water systems) contained inside the property.

When it comes to the assets contained within the property, it is important for investors to be aware that two methods can be used to claim the depreciation deductions available for these assets. These are the prime cost method of depreciation and the diminishing value method of depreciation.

Both the diminishing value and the prime cost methods claim the total depreciation value over the life of a property. However the two methods use two different formulas to calculate depreciation deductions, achieving different short and long term cash flow positions for the property investor.

Under the diminishing value method, the deduction is calculated as a percentage of the balance you have left to deduct, while the formula used for the prime cost method is calculated as a percentage of the cost.

The two formulas used are outlined below:

Diminishing value method:


Prime cost method:


The strategy of the individual investor must be considered when determining which method is the best choice for an investor.

If an investor makes their claim using the diminishing value method, they are claiming a greater proportion of the assets cost in the earlier years of the effective life of the asset as set by the Australian Taxation Office, therefore receiving greater deductions in the earlier years of owning the property.

Alternatively, by selecting the prime cost method, an investor will receive lower deductions in the earlier years of ownership, but deductions over the long term will be more constant.

No matter which strategy an investor has, it is recommended to seek advice from an Accountant when making a decision and to consult with a specialist Quantity Surveyor to request a tax depreciation schedule that outlines the deductions available using both of these methods.

BMT Tax Depreciation recently conducted a sample study of BMT Tax Depreciation Schedules and analysed how the two different methods of depreciation for assets affected the outcomes of claims over a five, ten and fifteen year period. To read the full article including the case study from BMT Tax Depreciation, please click here.

Article Provided by BMT Tax Depreciation.

Bradley Beer (B. Con. Mgt, AAIQS, MRICS) is the Managing Director of BMT Tax Depreciation.  Please contact 1300 728 726 or visit www.bmtqs.com.au for an Australia-wide service.