Connect with us


SAS, GARP survey finds new CECL accounting standard already affecting strategies

SAS, GARP survey finds new CECL accounting standard already affecting strategies

As the clock is ticking for CECL implementation, challenges remain

Current Expected Credit Loss (CECL), the largest accounting change in history, will alter how banks estimate credit losses in their portfolio, and will have a significant impact on reported profitability and capital position. In a new survey, Complying With CECL: The Banks’ Perspective, from business analytics leader SAS and the Global Association of Risk Professionals (GARP), a majority of survey respondents reported that they have already started to see CECL’s impact, especially in areas such as technology investment and capital planning.

When it comes to technology, 65 percent of respondents reported that CECL has affected their IT strategy, with many citing that their current infrastructure is insufficient to meet the CECL requirements. Sixty-one percent of respondents also said CECL has affected their capital planning strategy.

Additionally, more than one-third of respondents said that CECL is already influencing their institution’s product offerings (37 percent) and loan pricing strategies (39 percent).

Recognizing the significance of the new standard, 37 percent of the respondents reported that they want to test CECL-related processes and technology in parallel with their current systems for a year or longer. For those institutions facing a December 2019 effective date, that leaves seven months to be ready and many challenges yet to address.

“Like so much of the post-crisis regulatory legacy, implementing CECL is a huge undertaking, requiring a cross-disciplinary, multiyear effort,” said Jeffrey Kutler, Editor-in-Chief at GARP. “This survey provides a snapshot of where the banks stand in 2018 and where they need to go.”

While survey responses indicate an overall agreement on the level of prescriptiveness and the scalability of the standard, institutions still face challenges with the interpretation and implementation of CECL. Almost half of respondents (43 percent) reported being least comfortable with data availability and quality. Respondents also face challenges with lifetime loss modeling and the production process.

Though CECL does not require organizations perform a discounted cash flow (DCF) analysis, which takes into consideration incoming payment streams and thus should result in a reduction of reserve requirements, institutions of all sizes expressed an interest in using a DCF method for CECL estimation. Forty-four percent of respondents indicated that they are pursuing such a DCF approach despite its additional complexity, especially given 94 percent of respondents rely on spreadsheets for their current allowance process.

“Meeting the needs for increased model complexity and enhanced disclosure requirements of CECL while maintaining the necessary controls for financial reporting will demand a higher level of industrialization across risk and finance than is generally applied in most financial organizations today,” said Troy Haines, Senior Vice President and head of the Risk Management Division at SAS.

In early 2018, SAS and GARP conducted the survey of 130 representatives from 98 lending organizations. The respondents consisted primarily of senior and mid-level executives; 89 percent work at banks, and 46 percent work at institutions with more than $50 billion in assets. Download the complete infographic here.

Editorial & Advertiser disclosure
Our website provides you with information, news, press releases, Opinion and advertorials on various financial products and services. This is not to be considered as financial advice and should be considered only for information purposes. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any information provided with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek Professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. We link to various third party websites, affiliate sales networks, and may link to our advertising partners websites. Though we are tied up with various advertising and affiliate networks, this does not affect our analysis or opinion. When you view or click on certain links available on our articles, our partners may compensate us for displaying the content to you, or make a purchase or fill a form. This will not incur any additional charges to you. To make things simpler for you to identity or distinguish sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles or links hosted on our site as a partner endorsed link.
Global Banking and Finance Review Awards Nominations 2022
2022 Awards now open. Click Here to Nominate


Newsletters with Secrets & Analysis. Subscribe Now