Editorial & Advertiser Disclosure Global Banking And Finance Review is an independent publisher which offers News, information, Analysis, Opinion, Press Releases, Reviews, Research reports covering various economies, industries, products, services and companies. The content available on globalbankingandfinance.com is sourced by a mixture of different methods which is not limited to content produced and supplied by various staff writers, journalists, freelancers, individuals, organizations, companies, PR agencies Sponsored Posts etc. The information available on this website is purely for educational and informational purposes only. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any of the information provided at globalbankingandfinance.com with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. Globalbankingandfinance.com also links to various third party websites and we cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of the information provided by third party websites. Links from various articles on our site to third party websites are a mixture of non-sponsored links and sponsored links. Only a very small fraction of the links which point to external websites are affiliate links. Some of the links which you may click on our website may link to various products and services from our partners who may compensate us if you buy a service or product or fill a form or install an app. This will not incur additional cost to you. A very few articles on our website are sponsored posts or paid advertorials. These are marked as sponsored posts at the bottom of each post. For avoidance of any doubts and to make it easier for you to differentiate sponsored or non-sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles on our site or all links to external websites as sponsored . Please note that some of the services or products which we talk about carry a high level of risk and may not be suitable for everyone. These may be complex services or products and we request the readers to consider this purely from an educational standpoint. The information provided on this website is general in nature. Global Banking & Finance Review expressly disclaims any liability without any limitation which may arise directly or indirectly from the use of such information.

HAVE THE YEARS OF PLENTY GONE? FOR SOME ASSET CLASSES THEY CERTAINLY HAVE.

By Alexander Varyushkin

Partner, Head of Asset Management at Third Rome Group (strategic partner of Oracle Capital Group)

In 2015, it will be exactly seven years since the U.S. Federal Reserve (followed duly by other leading central banks) went on an unprecedented free money policy spree in an attempt to lend momentum to the faltering global economy. Most market participants expect the Fed in 2015 to start normalising rates (in the sense that today they are abnormally low). Interest rate futures point towards a 0.5% rise to 0.75% by the end of 2015, moving further up by another 1% to reach 1.75% in late 2016. Economists envisage a somewhat more aggressive scenario with interest rates reaching 1% by the end of 2015 to climb to 2.5% by the end of 2016 and to 3.5% by the end of 2017. Still, while market participants ostensibly expect interest rates to go up, yields on long-term debt securities seem to belie this forecast. Yields on 10-year U.S. Treasuries currently stand at about 2.5%. Supposing short-term yields reach 3.5% by the end of 2017, the current fair yield should be hovering within the 2.8-3.6% range (with lots of reservations regarding the shape of the yield curve). What is the reason for the prices to ignore economic forecasts, and do they really? In our view, there are two possible explanations:

Alexander Varyushkin
Alexander Varyushkin

1) The mismatch between investment horizons of most investors and the terms of the securities they invest in. We mean that several years up until early 2013 were extremely successful for investments in high-quality long-term bonds and some investors have «grown used to» low volatility and excellent yields while others cannot afford to invest in short-term securities due to the near-zero returns they offer.

The famous words by Chuck Prince, the former Citigroup CEO, on the mortgage bond market are extremely appropriate here: “When the music stops, in terms of liquidity, things will be complicated. But as long as the music is playing, you’ve got to get up and dance. We’re still dancing.”

2) The market does not support the economists’ view and expects the global economy to post slow growth which will prompt monetary authorities to keep in place their lose money policies for longer. Which is essentially sticking to the “Japanese” scenario as far as interest rates are concerned (because on the stock market performance and economic growth fronts it has already proved a failure). Yields on 10-year Japanese sovereign bonds are at 0.52% while inflation over the last 10 years has stuck at near-zero levels. The market for Japan’s bonds has even earned itself the nickname «Widow Maker» as many investors who in the last 10 years bet on higher interest rates and went short have since gone bust. To some extent, this view draws support from the major central banks with the exception of the U.S. Federal Reserve (the European Central Bank and the Bank of Japan), which are moving in the opposite direction and keep loosening their purse strings.

Another explanation could be that on the debt market «lean» years had begun as early as the start of 2013 and it is just that the adaptation to market expectations regarding future monetary policies does not happen instantly. At the beginning of 2013, we knew that over the next 7-10 years yields on investments in U.S. Treasuries (benchmark long-term quality debt securities) would not exceed 1.2-1.5%, translating into near-zero nominal and negative real returns.

Since the start of 2013 investments in long-term U.S. Treasuries have brought investor NIL in the way of return. Slightly riskier investments in quality corporate instruments have yielded about 3% over the last 18 months, which is exactly what one would expect in a «lean-year» period.

We tend to think that the secular bear bond market is already here, that in all likelihood it will not be overaggressive and that the U.S. Federal Reserve will not be aggressive either in tightening its monetary policy. Which means that beta returns are a thing of the past and for the next few years assiduous selection of maturities along with thorough credit analysis should become second nature for investors operating on the debt market.

About Third Rome Group

Third Rome Group (strategic partner of Oracle Capital Group) is an international group of companies, established in 2009. The company provides a broad range of services including asset management, investment consulting, trading, corporate finance, asset and deal structuring services, as well as other solutions based on the concept “Investment bank for private clients”. Third Rome’s top managers are well known to the market due to many years of experience in asset management and financial services. They have earned a reputation as top-notch professionals with impeccable business ethics. They also have experience at leading investment institutions and a proven track record of successful transactions, many of which were ground-breaking in the development of the Russian market. Over the past 5 years, the company has received recognition and 6 prestigious awards for exemplary contribution in the field of investment banking and asset management. Third Rome is in the 2012 Russia’s top 20 Money Managers ranking by Institutional Investor.
http://third-rome.com