Editorial & Advertiser Disclosure Global Banking And Finance Review is an independent publisher which offers News, information, Analysis, Opinion, Press Releases, Reviews, Research reports covering various economies, industries, products, services and companies. The content available on globalbankingandfinance.com is sourced by a mixture of different methods which is not limited to content produced and supplied by various staff writers, journalists, freelancers, individuals, organizations, companies, PR agencies etc. The information available on this website is purely for educational and informational purposes only. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any of the information provided at globalbankingandfinance.com with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. Globalbankingandfinance.com also links to various third party websites and we cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of the information provided by third party websites.
Links from various articles on our site to third party websites are a mixture of non-sponsored links and sponsored links. Only a very small fraction of the links which point to external websites are affiliate links. Some of the links which you may click on our website may link to various products and services from our partners who may compensate us if you buy a service or product or fill a form or install an app. This will not incur additional cost to you. For avoidance of any doubts and to make it easier, you may consider any links to external websites as sponsored links. Please note that some of the services or products which we talk about carry a high level of risk and may not be suitable for everyone. These may be complex services or products and we request the readers to consider this purely from an educational standpoint. The information provided on this website is general in nature. Global Banking & Finance Review expressly disclaims any liability without any limitation which may arise directly or indirectly from the use of such information.


By JaisalPastakia, Investment Manager at Heartwood Investment Management

Volatility in equity markets picked up at the end of the week, having been exceptionally low this year. The VIX Index – also known as the ‘fear’ gauge and which measures the implied volatility levels of the S&P 500 – has increased to levels last seen in early November 2016, having spent much of the year falling to historic lows. It is important to consider what has been driving down volatility.

 The VIX Index: Implied volatility levels of the S&P 500 (last three years)  

vix index

Low growth, low interest rates and low inflation have fueled investors thirst for yield and return, driving asset prices higher especially in those sectors that are cash generative, such as ‘bond-proxies’. The hunt for yield has been further reinforced by central bank buying – estimated to be worth $2 trillion of assets this year – which has lowered yields in government and corporate bond markets, forcing investors into riskier assets. However, the impact of central bank asset-purchase programmes is not the whole story.

Over the past decade, we have also witnessed the rise of the ‘non-fundamental’ investor. A shift in the composition of buyers and sellers through product innovations is changing the structure of the market. J.P. Morgan estimates that only 10% of trading volumes now originate from discretionary fundamental investors. In fact, more than half of equity assets are owned by passive or quantitative investors compared with less than one-third a decade ago.

As a result, investors are now buying and selling the market in its entirety rather than trading on stock-specific fundamentals. This investment behaviour not only increases the market’s efficiency but tends to lead to large rotations across style and sector, such as we saw in the weeks following Donald Trump’s election. At that time, there were significant asset flows from growth into value and from defensive sectors into more cyclical areas of the market. Moreover, large asset shifts actually lower correlations among sectors and stocks, further depressing volatility.

Some investors are now viewing volatility as an asset class in its own right. The strategy of selling volatility, via writing options, has been increasingly adopted by both hedge funds and institutional investors, including pension funds and life insurers, as a way to extract additional income in a low yield environment. Such strategies also distort measures of volatility, creating an impression of calm.

Are we entering a new phase?

There will come a time when market liquidity and risk appetite must be tested – perhaps these trends are starting to emerge now. Beyond the headlines about US and North Korean tensions, there is an increasing sense that we are shifting into a new phase for the global economy, as central banks look towards exiting emergency stimulus levels. The US Federal Reserve plans to begin reducing its balance sheet later this year and with less liquidity being injected into financial markets, this may be enough to undermine market sentiment. Such potential action also comes at a time when economic momentum appears to be moderating, albeit at the margin.