Editorial & Advertiser Disclosure Global Banking And Finance Review is an independent publisher which offers News, information, Analysis, Opinion, Press Releases, Reviews, Research reports covering various economies, industries, products, services and companies. The content available on globalbankingandfinance.com is sourced by a mixture of different methods which is not limited to content produced and supplied by various staff writers, journalists, freelancers, individuals, organizations, companies, PR agencies etc. The information available on this website is purely for educational and informational purposes only. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any of the information provided at globalbankingandfinance.com with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. Globalbankingandfinance.com also links to various third party websites and we cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of the information provided by third party websites.
Links from various articles on our site to third party websites are a mixture of non-sponsored links and sponsored links. Only a very small fraction of the links which point to external websites are affiliate links. Some of the links which you may click on our website may link to various products and services from our partners who may compensate us if you buy a service or product or fill a form or install an app. This will not incur additional cost to you. For avoidance of any doubts and to make it easier, you may consider any links to external websites as sponsored links. Please note that some of the services or products which we talk about carry a high level of risk and may not be suitable for everyone. These may be complex services or products and we request the readers to consider this purely from an educational standpoint. The information provided on this website is general in nature. Global Banking & Finance Review expressly disclaims any liability without any limitation which may arise directly or indirectly from the use of such information.


London-based Catalyst Development Ltd, market leaders in clearing, risk and regulation, have issued an advisory briefing for hedge funds explaining how they can save $ millions each year through a brand new approach to trade compression, re-engineered specifically for the hedge fund market. Catalyst believe action is urgently required if funds are to withstand major increases in clearing broker fees as the European Clearing Mandate comes into force in early 2016. Catalyst’s approach is outlined in the attached white paper ‘OTC IRS Portfolio Optimisationhow trade compression could save hedge funds $ millions before the 2016 European Clearing Mandate strikes.’

Catalyst’s extensive experience working with futures commission merchants and clearing brokers has led them to conclude that broker fees will need to increase an estimated eight to tenfold as the consequences of leverage ratio and post crisis reform begin to bite.  In their opinion, the collision of a number of key factors is set to compound the impact for hedge funds. In particular:

  • the European Clearing Mandate is set to apply early in 2016 and the US Mandate is already in force.  Hedge funds must access these services.
  • the Basel III leverage ratio requires banks to optimise capital: they can no longer afford to offer broker services at a loss. Several have already dropped out of the market with more set to follow. Those who remain will be targeting a 14% – 15% return on capital, up from the current 1% – 2%.
  • MiFID II sets the stage for Organised Trading Facilities (OTFs), which will drive a wedge between the traditional cross-subsidy from execution to clearing.
Tom Lodge
Tom Lodge

Tom Lodge, Catalyst Partner and the paper’s lead author comments “We believe a perfect storm is building and we are advising all funds trading IRS at volume to use 2015 to maximise their trading and clearing efficiency before the European Clearing Mandate comes into effect. The ideal solution is compression. Historically however, this has been seen as relevant only to the sell-side: to date, hedge funds have lacked bespoke tools that allow intra-fund netting and compression while keeping individual strategies flat. We have therefore re-engineered netting and compression for the hedge fund market.  Our unique approach allows any hedge fund trading IRS at reasonable volume to save approximately 80% of clearing broker fees and thus tens of $ millions each year, by optimising the use of market compression solutions and eliminating excess gross notional from their book.  On top of these savings, it also allows funds to make additional savings of $ 3 million a year in lower execution costs.”

Catalyst’s white paper  ‘OTC IRS Portfolio Optimisationhow trade compression could save hedge funds $ millions before the 2016 European Clearing Mandate strikes” is written by Catalyst Partners Tom Lodge and Stephen Loosley with expert Sean Coote.