Search
00
GBAF Logo
trophy
Top StoriesInterviewsBusinessFinanceBankingTechnologyInvestingTradingVideosAwardsMagazinesHeadlinesTrends

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest news and updates from our team.

Global Banking and Finance Review

Global Banking & Finance Review

Company

    GBAF Logo
    • About Us
    • Profile
    • Wealth
    • Privacy & Cookie Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
    • Advertising
    • Submit Post
    • Latest News
    • Research Reports
    • Press Release
    • Awards▾
      • About the Awards
      • Awards TimeTable
      • Submit Nominations
      • Testimonials
      • Media Room
      • Award Winners
      • FAQ

    Global Banking & Finance Review® is a leading financial portal and online magazine offering News, Analysis, Opinion, Reviews, Interviews & Videos from the world of Banking, Finance, Business, Trading, Technology, Investing, Brokerage, Foreign Exchange, Tax & Legal, Islamic Finance, Asset & Wealth Management.
    Copyright © 2010-2025 GBAF Publications Ltd - All Rights Reserved.

    ;
    Editorial & Advertiser disclosure

    Global Banking and Finance Review is an online platform offering news, analysis, and opinion on the latest trends, developments, and innovations in the banking and finance industry worldwide. The platform covers a diverse range of topics, including banking, insurance, investment, wealth management, fintech, and regulatory issues. The website publishes news, press releases, opinion and advertorials on various financial organizations, products and services which are commissioned from various Companies, Organizations, PR agencies, Bloggers etc. These commissioned articles are commercial in nature. This is not to be considered as financial advice and should be considered only for information purposes. It does not reflect the views or opinion of our website and is not to be considered an endorsement or a recommendation. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any information provided with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek Professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. We link to various third-party websites, affiliate sales networks, and to our advertising partners websites. When you view or click on certain links available on our articles, our partners may compensate us for displaying the content to you or make a purchase or fill a form. This will not incur any additional charges to you. To make things simpler for you to identity or distinguish advertised or sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles or links hosted on our site as a commercial article placement. We will not be responsible for any loss you may suffer as a result of any omission or inaccuracy on the website.

    Headlines

    Carmakers accused in huge UK lawsuits of cheating diesel emissions tests

    Carmakers accused in huge UK lawsuits of cheating diesel emissions tests

    Published by Global Banking and Finance Review

    Posted on October 13, 2025

    Featured image for article about Headlines

    By Sam Tobin

    LONDON (Reuters) -Some of the world's biggest carmakers manipulated diesel emissions tests because they "would rather cheat than comply with the law", lawyers for over 1.6 million claimants told London's High Court on Monday, at the start of a huge trial.

    A decade on from Volkswagen's 'dieselgate' scandal, which cost the German automaker billions of euros, the claimants are suing rival manufacturers in one of the largest mass lawsuits in English legal history.

    Owners of diesel vehicles made by Mercedes-Benz, Ford, Nissan, Renault and the Stellantis-owned brands Peugeot and Citroen between 2012 and 2017 allege the companies cheated emissions tests.

    The manufacturers are accused of using unlawful "defeat devices", which detected when vehicles were being tested and ensured nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions were kept within legal limits under test conditions.

    The claimants' lawyers say NOx emissions were far higher when the cars were on the road – in some cases up to 12 times test limits – causing harm to the environment and entitling consumers to compensation.

    The manufacturers, however, say the claims are fundamentally flawed and argue there are justified reasons why systems to control emissions are calibrated to work differently in certain conditions.

    They also reject any similarity with the scandal that erupted in 2015, when VW admitted using defeat devices, and which has hung over the motor industry ever since.

    'DEFEAT DEVICES' TRIAL BEGINS

    The trial, which will conclude next year with a judgment expected in mid-2026, will focus on a sample of 20 diesel vehicles produced by the five manufacturers, who are being sued by nearly 850,000 of the claimants.

    The High Court will determine whether those sample vehicles contained prohibited defeat devices, with any damages owed to be decided at a further trial next year.

    The court's ruling will also be binding on another 800,000 or so similar claims against other manufacturers including Stellantis-owned Vauxhall/Opel and BMW.

    It is not the first time London's High Court has been asked to decide on defeat devices, having ruled against VW in 2020. VW settled those claims without any admission of liability in 2022.

    VW has had to pay more than 32 billion euros ($37 billion) in vehicle refits, fines and legal costs, while former Chief Executive Martin Winterkorn faced criminal charges, though his trial was suspended on health grounds earlier this month.

    The scandal has stretched beyond VW to other manufacturers and suppliers, some of whom have paid fines and reached settlements in the United States and elsewhere to resolve investigations into diesel vehicle emissions.

    Tom de la Mare, one of the claimants' lawyers, said manufacturers across the industry made "a conscious decision" to prioritise customer convenience over preventing pollution.

    He described the carmakers' approach as being that "we would rather cheat than comply with the law".

    AUTOMAKERS REJECT 'LONG SHADOW' OF VW SCANDAL

    The manufacturers at the centre of the trial, though, reject that and say the claimants have been distracted by the "long shadow" of VW's troubles.

    Renault's lawyer Alexander Antelme said in court filings that the claimants were working on the "false assumption that the features of 'VW dieselgate' applied across the entire automotive industry".

    The carmakers also stress that lower NOx levels often mean higher amounts of other pollutants are emitted and that there are good engineering or safety reasons for regulating emissions.

    All methods of emissions control involve "trade-offs between different emissions and the need for the diesel engine to operate properly and safely", Antelme argued.

    The current group of claims has previously been valued by the claimants' lawyers at around 6 billion pounds ($7.97 billion).

    ($1 = 0.8645 euros)

    ($1 = 0.7528 pounds)

    (Reporting by Sam Tobin; Editing by Elaine Hardcastle and Peter Graff)

    Why waste money on news and opinions when you can access them for free?

    Take advantage of our newsletter subscription and stay informed on the go!

    Subscribe