Heartwood Investment Team
What are our expectations for UK financial markets?
A higher risk premium across UK financial markets is likely to persist in the interim to June 23rd, with sterling most likely to be the lightning rod. We have already observed the UK currency’s meaningful depreciation since David Cameron announced the new settlement with the EU, having fallen 6% on a trade-weighted basis since the start of the year. UK equities and gilts have remained fairly resilient so far, swayed more by global considerations: the US interest rate cycle, China and commodity prices. Nonetheless, Brexit headlines between now and June have the potential to create toxic vapour that are unlikely to be helpful to UK financial markets.
And what happens after 23rd June?
It is obviously difficult to predict the electoral outcome, but also since there is no precedent we should be wary of making sweeping statements about the potential financial market implications. The referendum in 1975 perhaps draws more political rather than investment or economic comparisons, in light of developments in the global economy over the past two decades.
We assume that a vote to stay in the EU would be seen by investors as largely business as usual and greeted with relief, much in the same way as the post-relief rally following the Scottish referendum result in 2014. There could, however, be questions about a second referendum if the result is far from decisive, which could add to market uncertainty in the longer term.
Broadly, though, the proposed agreement with the EU does not appear to change the economic framework to any great extent, nor does it appear likely to significantly impact the inward flow of European labour, which has helped to keep UK wage growth relatively modest, to the benefit of the corporate sector. Overall, therefore, a vote to remain within the EU on renegotiated terms would be taken as a net positive by the markets, especially in light of the UK’s current account deficit of 4.2% of GDP and the UK’s high dependence on foreign capital flows to fund it.
We expect some of the risk premium being built into UK assets, particularly sterling, to unwind. The UK gilt market may sell off moderately, particularly if there has been a risk off trade in advance of the decision, but longer-term economic fundamental dynamics will continue to drive bond yields, which should be ultimately positive for gilts, and in particular there would be no clouds overhanging the UK’s sovereign credit rating. The UK economy is performing adequately, and the recent weakness in sterling will go some way to improving the terms of trade, which clearly deteriorated in recent months as sterling, on a trade weighted basis, appreciated. Investors will also, as ever, prefer the certainty of the new regime over the current uncertainty, which, all other things being equal, should help the bid for sterling assets, including gilts and equities. Finally, UK property assets should also enjoy continued support from overseas investment flows.
What if the UK votes to leave the EU?
The consequences of leaving are of course more uncertain, both in terms of the mechanism of leaving (which has not been tested) and the length of time to achieve it; although two years is timetabled, it is open to question as to whether this is achievable. The negotiations could be messy and protracted, and the EU will want to maintain a firm hand to avoid encouraging other potential exit candidates. Furthermore, we would expect UK economic growth to contract if external demand for services weakens and confidence is undermined, resulting in slower consumption that might hurt growth, employment and wages.
The price action of sterling is largely driven by monetary policy and capital flows and on this basis we would expect the UK currency to stay weak on concerns about Bank of England deferring interest rate hikes, concerns of capital flight and uncertainty on the credit rating outlook. As these concerns are assuaged and depending on the level of sterling reached, we would have a more optimistic cyclical view of the currency over the longer term, as ultimately we see no significant lasting damage to the UK economy.
UK Fixed Income
In theory, an ‘Out’ result would be negative for the UK gilt market since there will be questions around the UK’s ability to maintain its AAA sovereign credit rating (although ultimately we do not believe this to be a significant factor) and the threat of capital flight, given the UK’s rather sizeable current account deficit which needs to attract foreign buyers.
However, in reality, there will probably be few places to hide among UK assets, and gilts may offer the safe haven, risk-off trade, particularly if Bank of England interest rate hike expectations are pushed back as a result. The gilt market is a predominantly domestic-owned market, notwithstanding that foreign ownership currently stands at an all-time high. We expect the Bank of England to counter the negative effects of any potential international selling of gilts as it has the capacity to absorb non-domestic-owned bond sales through a new round of quantitative easing. Such action could be justified on the basis of the need for central bank support to lower funding costs through the transitional period of the UK leaving the EU.
From a yield curve perspective, shorter-dated bond yields could outperform as the risk premium at the long end increases on the overall business and economic uncertainty, a weaker sterling and the potential for the UK to return to its more inflationary past.
More than half of the UK equity market is owned by overseas investors and it could be vulnerable to weaker sentiment in the short term, particularly among financials and exporters to Europe. That said, large-cap UK indices are driven more by global factors and heavily skewed toward cyclical sectors, such as mining and energy, which are in aggregate beneficiaries of a weaker sterling. Over the longer-term, uncertainty is likely to weigh on the financial sectors, as investors struggle to understand any new regulatory regime.
Further down the market-cap spectrum, domestically-exposed small and mid-cap stocks could see more pressure on the basis of the economic uncertainty presented by a Brexit scenario. In addition, import costs for these companies could rise, due to the deteriorating terms of trade, which would squeeze profit margins.
In the coming months, we would expect a period of subdued activity as overseas investors wait to see how the referendum campaign evolves. However, post June we would expect flows to pick up as international investors take advantage of the fall in sterling, and on the view that any exit will take time and is unlikely to prove damaging to UK asset values in the long term.
What is the likely impact of Brexit from a European perspective?
Clearly if the UK were to leave the EU, we would expect headline noise questioning the validity of the overall EU project. German assets would most likely see a safe-haven bid for euro-based investors in the short term, as equities and bond markets in periphery countries (for example, Spain, Italy and Portugal) could be vulnerable, although a weaker euro could prove beneficial over the longer term to the euro-area’s external economy.
There must be some possibility that discussion over Brexit creates the domino effect of other countries seeking to leave the EU, though this is not our central case. However, we do think that a Brexit outcome might create an opportunity for countries to advance their own individual agendas and renegotiate their own terms of membership with the EU. Overall, we are not expecting the EU to fracture as a result of Brexit, but it could well raise tensions within Europe. At the same time, however, the UK’s exit could strengthen the European Parliament’s hand in leaning towards further progress in areas such as fiscal integration, regulation, taxation, subsidies or investment programmes.
The UK’s potential departure would create a funding gap that would have to be filled by other countries. In 2014, the UK’s net contribution to the EU’s budget was €4.93bn, or 19% of total net contributions. Current net-contributing nations may push for expenditure cuts, while net receivers may ask other countries for greater contributions. Future budget negotiations would therefore have a further layer of complexity. These issues could raise questions around the impact on funding costs of EU supra-national borrowers. For example, could a potential UK departure and the associated loss of UK guarantees lead to ratings downgrades for the EU and the European Investment Bank and thus increase their borrowing costs? It is possible, but in the current climate we expect the impact may be marginal.
Brexit would likely have far smaller financial repercussions compared with the exit of a eurozone country, since the UK has its own currency and fast outflows of bank deposits would be far less likely. With much of the UK exposures most likely funded in sterling and therefore hedged against the currency risk, it would take a very large and persistent swing in the exchange rate, and potentially large-scale defaults in the UK, to actually create a significant impact negative on the rest of Europe.
Finally, how are we positioning portfolios?
While we are cognisant of the risks of the UK leaving the EU, we are not specifically re-positioning our portfolios in anticipation of such an outcome. Other global factors remain more significant drivers of financial market performance – China rebalancing, Federal Reserve tightening and commodity prices.
In any case, we have for some time maintained an underweight exposure to UK equities and to sterling. Our view on sterling was based on expectations of UK interest rates staying low, the higher valuation of sterling after a period of significant strength, and the relative interest rate differential with the US that was likely to favour the US dollar. In the gilt market, we are maintaining a short duration position based on our longer-term expectations for inflation and the Bank of England interest rate cycle.
We have also held a long-term positive view on the UK commercial property market, which has benefitted from supportive supply/demand dynamics and low interest rates. The property cycle is maturing and we would, in any case, expect to be reducing our exposure to this sector through the year, and headline noise surrounding Brexit is also likely to prove a headwind.
In summary, our positioning in assets most exposed to Brexit risks is:
- Underweight sterling, not solely on Brexit but in response to global factors including Federal Reserve tightening and the significant appreciation that sterling has experienced over the past year or more.
- Maintain short duration position in UK gilts, with a bias towards shorter-dated bond maturities.
- Underweight UK equities from an asset allocation perspective, but within UK equities we are holding higher exposure to large-caps versus small- and mid-caps.
- Maintain exposure to UK commercial property, but with a view to reducing this allocation to reflect the maturing cycle, rather than as a reaction to Brexit.
What is the procedure for proving a missing or lost Will?
By Alexa Payet, Partner at Bolt Burdon and listed specialist in the Certainty
Contentious Probate Hub & Area
When an individual dies it is necessary to search their paperwork to establish whether they made a Will and gather information regarding their estate. This is important because the personal representatives of the estate have a legal duty to distribute the estate correctly and could be held financially responsible for any mistakes made through any breach of duty.
Where a Will cannot be found but is believed to exist there are a number of steps that can be taken to help confirm its existence, including (but not limited to) the following:
- making enquiries of the deceased’s family and friends;
- making enquiries with the deceased’s professional advisors;
- instructing The National Will Register to undertake a Certainty Will Search.
Presumption of revocation
Where the original Will is known to have been in the testator’s possession before their death and cannot be located afterwards, there is a rebuttable presumption that the Will was destroyed by the testator with the intention of revoking it. If an order for the proof of a copy is to be obtained then this presumption must be rebutted.
Procedure for proving a copy Will
The procedure for proving a copy Will is set out in Rule 54 of the Non-Contentious Probate Rules 1987 (‘NCPR’).
The application is made to the Probate Registry at which the application for the grant will be made and the order can be made by a district judge or registrar.
The application must be supported by evidence in the form of an affidavit (although during the global pandemic the rules have been amended by the Non-Contentious Probate (Amendment) Rules 2020, SI 2020/1059, to provide for the use of witness statements as an alternative to affidavits).
The evidence must set out the grounds of the application and any available evidence that the applicant can adduce as to the Will’s existence after the death of the testator or, where there is no such evidence, the facts on which the applicant relies to rebut the presumption that the Will was destroyed by the testator during his/her life.
The applicant must ensure that the Court has the best available evidence of what happened to the testator’s Will in order that effect may be given to his/her testamentary wishes.
It is important to understand that the applicant does not need to demonstrate that the Will has been lost (it is the fact of its loss which gives rise to the presumption of revocation). Instead, the applicant must establish, by evidence, that the Will was not in fact revoked.
What is a Certainty Will Search and why is it necessary?
A Certainty Will Search searches for Wills that have been registered on The National Will Register (circa 8.7 million Will registrations in the system) and for Wills that have not yet been registered in geographically targeted areas where the deceased used to live and/or work. A Certainty Will Search is extremely important as it will be necessary to notify the probate registry of any persons who would be prejudiced by the grant if the copy Will is proved. If no such person exists then the registrar is more likely to grant the application. Alternatively, if such a person does exist then you should seek to obtain their written consent to the application. The written consents can then be lodged with (or following) your application.
Oil prices rise as investors look to higher demand seen in second half
By Shadia Nasralla
LONDON (Reuters) – Oil prices climbed on Tuesday as optimism that government stimulus will eventually lift global economic growth and oil demand trumped concerns that renewed COVID-19 pandemic lockdowns globally are cooling fuel consumption.
Brent crude futures for March rose 72 cents to $55.47 a barrel by 1152 GMT after slipping 35 cents in the previous session.
“The perception that any retracement will be quick as confidence in economic and oil demand recovery is unlikely to fade away,” said PVM analysts in a note.
U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude was at $52.65 a barrel, up 29 cents. There was no settlement on Monday as U.S. markets were closed for a public holiday. Front-month February WTI futures expire on Wednesday.
Investors are upbeat about demand in China, the world’s top crude oil importer, after data released on Monday showed its refinery output rose 3% to a new record in 2020.
China also avoided an economic contraction last year.
Investors are watching out for U.S. oil inventory data from the industry association API, due on Wednesday, the same day U.S. President-elect Biden’s inauguration speech will likely give details on the country’s $1.9 trillion aid package.
The International Energy Agency cut its outlook for oil demand in 2021, but pointed to a recovery in demand in the second half of the year to an annual average of 96.6 million barrels per day.
“Border closures, social distancing measures and shutdowns…will continue to constrain fuel demand until vaccines are more widely distributed, most likely only by the second half of the year,” it said in its monthly report.
(Additional reporting by Florence Tan, editing by Louise Heavens)
Can Thematic Investing provide investors with growth opportunities in uncertain times?
New whitepaper from CAMRADATA explores
CAMRADATA’s latest whitepaper on Thematic Investing, considers the role this type of investing can play in asset management and explores trends that can permeate society and traverse sectors. The whitepaper includes insights from guests who attended a virtual roundtable on Thematic Investing hosted by CAMRADATA in November, including representatives from CPR Asset Management, Sarasin & Partners, Impact Investing Institute, PwC, Quilter Cheviot, Scottish Widows and Stonehage Fleming.
Sean Thompson, Managing Director, CAMRADATA said, “In these seminal times, thematic investing has the potential to shape how the future unfolds. Yet running a successful thematic fund is no easy feat – it is a bit like navigating unchartered waters trying to identify the trends and the long-term opportunities.
“Trends such as AI and biotechnology are still in their relative early days, for example, and global economies are undergoing dramatic changes. But mapping out certain trends, identifying potential sustainable returns through a unifying thread that spans multiple sectors, could help future-proof investments. “Our roundtable guests considered current key themes, which themes worked well, and which have not and how thematic investors could identify trends with the potential to offer future growth.”
The guests named themes they currently like which included artificial intelligence, China, climate change, clean energy, automation, evolving consumption, ageing, digitalisation, water, waste management, biodiversity, and board diversity.
After discussing themes that have worked or not, the guests looked at total allocation to themed funds, and whether clients might be blinded by themes to the overall risk exposure in their portfolios.
Key takeaway points were:
- Themes have a habit of coming and going. One guest recognised that automation and robotics, for example, were cyclical, which means that investors will have to think carefully about entry-points.
- It was agreed that the commodities ‘super cycle’ of the 2000s came about with the economic development of China. Many commodities-based products found their way into mainstream investing, but this is unlikely to happen again.
- One guest was surprised by some of the themes that interested their customers; with their research showing that Board Diversity was almost the lowest-ranking concern among the ESG choices they listed.
- There was correlation between environmental impact and social benefits to investing. The theme that concerns the Impact Investing Institute, which is less than two years old, is improved measurement of such relationships.
- In terms of successful themes, one clear winner due to COVID had been digitalisation.
- One theme that has not done so well is the Ageing theme focused on older people travelling and enjoying experiences abroad later in life.
- One guest said their firm used themes for ideas generation, not as a shortcut for portfolio construction. They said themes lead to good ideas, but they then spend at least three months researching a stock, so that the best themes are represented by the best investments.
- The final point was that there are sensitivities for any global investor in allocating to themes, even the biggest one of all, Climate Change.
- But on a positive note, one guest added if all stakeholders can resolve their differences on definitions such as impact and ethical investing, then more capital will be readily transferred into opportunities.
The whitepaper also features two articles from the sponsors offering valuable additional insight. These are:
- CPR Asset Management: ‘Central Banks: leading the path towards Impact Investing’
- Sarasin & Partners: ‘Theme or fad? How to invest for the long term’
To download the Thematic Investing whitepaper, click here
For more information on CAMRADATA visit www.camradata.com
Why You Should Take On Debt To Stop Dilution
By Blair Silverberg, CEO of Capital Imagine an exciting space dominated by two major companies, each growing and developing at...
Audi aims to sell one million cars in China in 2023
BEIJING (Reuters) – German premium automaker Audi aims to sell 1 million vehicles in China in 2023, versus 726,000 vehicles...
Netflix forecasts an end to borrowing binge, shares surge
By Lisa Richwine and Eva Mathews (Reuters) – Netflix Inc said on Tuesday its global subscriber rolls crossed 200 million...
MGM Resorts drops takeover plan for Ladbrokes-owner Entain
By Tanishaa Nadkar (Reuters) – Casino operator MGM Resorts International on Tuesday ditched plans to buy Ladbrokes owner Entain after...
Mike Ashley’s Frasers ups stake in Hugo Boss to over 15%
(Reuters) – Mike Ashley-led Frasers said on Tuesday it has increased its stake in German luxury fashion house Hugo Boss...
Sterling rises above $1.37 for first time since 2018; UK inflation rises
By Elizabeth Howcroft LONDON (Reuters) – A combination of heightened risk appetite in global markets and UK-specific optimism lifted the...
Euro sinks amid broader risk rally against dollar
By Ritvik Carvalho LONDON (Reuters) – The euro struggled to join a broader risk rally against the dollar on Wednesday...
Britain to publish new weekly consumer spending data
LONDON (Reuters) – Britain’s statistics office said it would publish new weekly consumer spending data from Thursday, based on credit...
Mercedes unveils electric compact SUV in bid to outdo Tesla
By Nick Carey (Reuters) – Daimler AG’s Mercedes-Benz on Wednesday unveiled the EQA, a new electric compact SUV as part...
England soccer star Rashford nets younger buyers for Burberry
By Sarah Young LONDON (Reuters) – Burberry stuck to its full-year goals on Wednesday after a media campaign fronted by...