Published by Global Banking & Finance Review®
Posted on December 11, 2025
5 min readLast updated: January 20, 2026
Add as preferred source on GoogleAustralia's new law bans under-16s from social media to protect youth. Global reactions vary, and platforms face compliance challenges.
By Byron Kaye
SYDNEY, Dec 11 (Reuters) - Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese on Thursday took aim at young people parading themselves on social media a day after a world-first ban on under-16s went live, saying the rollout was always going to be bumpy but would ultimately save lives.
A day after the law took effect with bipartisan support from the major political parties and backing by some three-quarters of Australian parents, the country's social media feeds were flooded with comments from people claiming to be under 16, including one on the prime minister's TikTok account saying "I'm still here, wait until I can vote".
Under the law, 10 of the biggest platforms including TikTok, Meta's Instagram and Alphabet's YouTube must bar underage users or face a fine of up to A$49.5 million ($33 million). The government has said it would take some time for the platforms to set up processes to do this.
"This is the law, this isn't something that can be flouted," Albanese said on News Corp's Sky News.
"Some young people who haven't yet been pulled off social media are sending out notices bragging about it. That just tells the platforms who they are, and so it will be taken down."
Governments around the world have said they would monitor the Australian ban as they weigh whether to do something similar. U.S. Republican senator Josh Hawley endorsed the ban as it took effect, Nine newspapers reported, while France, Denmark, Malaysia and others have said they plan to emulate the Australian model.
The Australian internet regulator, the eSafety Commissioner, would ask all affected platforms to report numbers of under-16 accounts on the days before and after the ban went live on Wednesday, Communications Minister Anika Wells said.
Albanese has pitched the ban as an intervention to protect young people from mental health risks associated with social media, including bullying, body image problems and addictive algorithms.
While some teens trumpeted their ability to flout the ban, Australian content creators are reporting large falls in follower numbers and views. The government says some 200,000 accounts have been deactivated on TikTok alone since the ban went live.
Meta repeated its opposition to the law, saying some experts, advocates and parent groups were concerned it was driving teenagers to less regulated parts of the internet and that there was "little interest in compliance".
"This will result in inconsistent application of the law and ultimately does not make young people safer," a spokesperson said.
TikTok and Snap, owner of Snapchat, declined to comment on the implementation, while YouTube, X, Amazon's Twitch, Reddit and Australian-owned Kick - all of which are covered by the ban - were not immediately available for comment.
HEATED GLOBAL REACTIONS
The ban generated impassioned reactions across the spectrum of global commentators - including from U.S. psychologist Jonathan Haidt, whose book "The Anxious Generation" featured prominently in the Australian debate.
The ban was "the most significant measure to protect children from social media harms", he wrote on social media.
"Dr" Phil McGraw, the U.S. television presenter, in an interview on NewsNation's "On Balance with Leland Vittert", said the measure would "help immensely and force them to engage with the environment, with friends, get out into the real world".
A week earlier, American talk show host Oprah Winfrey said the ban would change the lives of a generation.
The United Nations children's agency UNICEF warned in a statement the ban might encourage children to visit less regulated parts of the internet and could not work alone.
"Laws introducing age restrictions are not an alternative to companies improving platform design and content moderation," the statement said.
Albanese, visiting a school in Canberra, said the ban would lead to better educational outcomes and behaviour" since "you get better social interaction when students aren't subject to looking at their devices constantly".
Australian searches for virtual private networks (VPNs), which can mask an internet user's location, surged to the highest level in about 10 years in the week before the legislation took effect, according to publicly available Google data.
All 10 platforms named by the ban opposed it before saying they would comply. As the legislation came into force, some platforms not covered by the ban rose to the top of app download charts, prompting the Australian government to say the platform list was "dynamic".
One app, Lemon8, which is owned by TikTok parent ByteDance, introduced an age minimum of 16. Photo-sharing app Yope told Reuters it had experienced "very fast growth" to about 100,000 Australian users. About half its users were over 16.
The company told Reuters it had told the Australian internet regulator overseeing the ban that it considered itself a private messaging service, not social media.
($1 = 1.4995 Australian dollars)
(Reporting by Byron Kaye; Additional reporting by Alasdair Pal; Editing by Stephen Coates)
Social media refers to online platforms that allow users to create, share, and interact with content and each other. Examples include Facebook, Instagram, and TikTok.
A regulatory framework is a set of rules and guidelines established by authorities to govern specific sectors, ensuring compliance and protecting public interests.
Youth protection refers to laws and measures designed to safeguard minors from harm, including exposure to inappropriate content on social media.
Digital safety involves practices and measures taken to protect individuals' personal information and privacy while using online platforms and technologies.
Explore more articles in the Headlines category
