Published by Global Banking & Finance Review®
Posted on September 18, 2025
2 min readLast updated: January 21, 2026
Add as preferred source on GoogleKeir Starmer highlights the need for limits on free speech to protect vulnerable groups, citing the UK's Online Safety Law as a measure.
CHEQUERS, England (Reuters) -Prime Minister Keir Starmer said on Thursday that Britain "fiercely" protects free speech, but when it was used to incite real harm to children and vulnerable people there was a limit.
"Free speech is one of the founding values of the United Kingdom, and we protect it jealously and fiercely and always will," Starmer told reporters as he stood alongside U.S. President Donald Trump.
"I draw a limit between free speech and the speech of those that want to peddle paedophilia and suicide (on) social media to children," he said.
"Therefore I'm all for free speech, but I'm also for protecting children from things that will harm them."
Britain's new Online Safety Law requires social media companies to remove illegal content on their platforms.
Encouraging self-harm, for example, was made a criminal offence so it was covered by the law.
An attempt by the previous government to ban content that was deemed to "harmful but legal" was abandoned because it risked curbing free speech.
However, police action over social media posts, such as the arrest of Irish comedian Graham Linehan for publishing comments about transgender issues on X earlier this month, had raised questions about how existing laws should apply online.
The police defended Linehan's arrest, but said its officers were in an "impossible position" arbitrating between free speech and criminal content.
(Reporting by Andrew MacAskill in Chequers and Muvija M, writing by Sam Tabahriti and Paul Sandle; Editing by Kate Holton and Michael Holden)
Keir Starmer stated that Britain fiercely protects free speech but recognizes limits when it incites harm to children and vulnerable individuals.
The Online Safety Law requires social media companies to remove illegal content from their platforms, including encouraging self-harm, which is now a criminal offence.
Concerns were raised about police actions, particularly the arrest of Graham Linehan, highlighting the difficult position officers face in balancing free speech with criminal content.
The previous government attempted to ban content deemed 'harmful but legal,' but this was abandoned due to concerns it could infringe on free speech.
The police defended their actions, stating that officers were in an 'impossible position' when trying to arbitrate between free speech and criminal content.
Explore more articles in the Headlines category
