Search
00
GBAF Logo
trophy
Top StoriesInterviewsBusinessFinanceBankingTechnologyInvestingTradingVideosAwardsMagazinesHeadlinesTrends

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest news and updates from our team.

Global Banking & Finance Review®

Global Banking & Finance Review® - Subscribe to our newsletter

Company

    GBAF Logo
    • About Us
    • Advertising and Sponsorship
    • Profile & Readership
    • Contact Us
    • Latest News
    • Privacy & Cookies Policies
    • Terms of Use
    • Advertising Terms
    • Issue 81
    • Issue 80
    • Issue 79
    • Issue 78
    • Issue 77
    • Issue 76
    • Issue 75
    • Issue 74
    • Issue 73
    • Issue 72
    • Issue 71
    • Issue 70
    • View All
    • About the Awards
    • Awards Timetable
    • Awards Winners
    • Submit Nominations
    • Testimonials
    • Media Room
    • FAQ
    • Asset Management Awards
    • Brand of the Year Awards
    • Business Awards
    • Cash Management Banking Awards
    • Banking Technology Awards
    • CEO Awards
    • Customer Service Awards
    • CSR Awards
    • Deal of the Year Awards
    • Corporate Governance Awards
    • Corporate Banking Awards
    • Digital Transformation Awards
    • Fintech Awards
    • Education & Training Awards
    • ESG & Sustainability Awards
    • ESG Awards
    • Forex Banking Awards
    • Innovation Awards
    • Insurance & Takaful Awards
    • Investment Banking Awards
    • Investor Relations Awards
    • Leadership Awards
    • Islamic Banking Awards
    • Real Estate Awards
    • Project Finance Awards
    • Process & Product Awards
    • Telecommunication Awards
    • HR & Recruitment Awards
    • Trade Finance Awards
    • The Next 100 Global Awards
    • Wealth Management Awards
    • Travel Awards
    • Years of Excellence Awards
    • Publishing Principles
    • Ownership & Funding
    • Corrections Policy
    • Editorial Code of Ethics
    • Diversity & Inclusion Policy
    • Fact Checking Policy
    Original content: Global Banking and Finance Review - https://www.globalbankingandfinance.com

    A global financial intelligence and recognition platform delivering authoritative insights, data-driven analysis, and institutional benchmarking across Banking, Capital Markets, Investment, Technology, and Financial Infrastructure.

    Copyright © 2010-2026 - All Rights Reserved. | Sitemap | Tags

    Editorial & Advertiser disclosure

    Global Banking & Finance Review® is an online platform offering news, analysis, and opinion on the latest trends, developments, and innovations in the banking and finance industry worldwide. The platform covers a diverse range of topics, including banking, insurance, investment, wealth management, fintech, and regulatory issues. The website publishes news, press releases, opinion and advertorials on various financial organizations, products and services which are commissioned from various Companies, Organizations, PR agencies, Bloggers etc. These commissioned articles are commercial in nature. This is not to be considered as financial advice and should be considered only for information purposes. It does not reflect the views or opinion of our website and is not to be considered an endorsement or a recommendation. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any information provided with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek Professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. We link to various third-party websites, affiliate sales networks, and to our advertising partners websites. When you view or click on certain links available on our articles, our partners may compensate us for displaying the content to you or make a purchase or fill a form. This will not incur any additional charges to you. To make things simpler for you to identity or distinguish advertised or sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles or links hosted on our site as a commercial article placement. We will not be responsible for any loss you may suffer as a result of any omission or inaccuracy on the website.

    1. Home
    2. >Finance
    3. >Tariff 'stacking' adds another headache for US importers
    Finance

    Tariff 'stacking' Adds Another Headache for US Importers

    Published by Global Banking & Finance Review®

    Posted on June 16, 2025

    5 min read

    Last updated: January 23, 2026

    Add as preferred source on Google
    Tariff 'stacking' adds another headache for US importers - Finance news and analysis from Global Banking & Finance Review
    Why waste money on news and opinion when you can access them for free?

    Take advantage of our newsletter subscription and stay informed on the go!

    Subscribe

    Tags:import and exporttradefinancial managementbusiness services

    Quick Summary

    Tariff stacking complicates costs for US importers, with existing tariffs compounded by new ones. Businesses seek alternatives to mitigate expenses.

    Tariff 'stacking' adds another headache for US importers

    By Timothy Aeppel

    (Reuters) -John Hamer, president of Rodgers Wade Manufacturing in Paris, Texas, makes store fixtures for big retailers like Ross Dress for Less and Ulta Beauty.

    He sources many of the goods from China, which until recently meant he paid 70% in tariffs on metal fixtures.

    "The media was saying it was 30%, but that was never true," he said, referring to the tariff rate for China announced in May as part of a truce between the Trump administration and Beijing as it negotiated a broader deal.

    That's because Hamer's 30% tariff was stacked on top of existing tariffs, including a tariff on Chinese steel products that varies depending on the amount of steel used in a fixture.

    When U.S. President Donald Trump adds a new tariff the old ones don't go away. Some companies will pay far more because of a phenomenon called tariff stacking, the latest complication for U.S. importers trying to navigate Trump's on-again, off-again trade war.

    The reality for many U.S. businesses is that their tariff bills are often far higher than the headline number touted in trade talks. 

    Tariff stacking applies to any country exporting to the U.S., but the most extreme cases tend to be with China, where the U.S. has accumulated a long list of sometimes hefty existing tariffs, implemented under different provisions of U.S. trade law.

    The latest twist is an announcement that the two sides have agreed to a 55% tariff, but that's in part only an estimate of what the average pre-existing tariffs were. Hamer isn't sure what his tariff total will be now, but he figures it couldn't get much worse.

    “Hopefully this will bring the (tariff) number down - and some of the clients who’ve been sitting on the sidelines will go ahead and place orders,” he said, “because it’s been all over the map.”

    'HERE'S THE TARIFF BILL'

    Hamer is searching for suppliers outside China to avoid his stacked tariffs. He’s checked Mexico and is planning a trip to India next month as part of the effort. In the meantime, he is passing through all the tariffs.

    "The customers pay the tariff," said Hamer. "When it comes in, we say, 'Here’s the tariff bill.'"

    Many businesses are still hoping for a reprieve from President Donald Trump's trade war. Federal courts, including the U.S. Court of International Trade, have ruled that Trump’s imposition of tariffs exceeded his authority. A federal appeals court is considering the administration’s appeal to that ruling, and the tariffs remain in effect while that plays out, a process expected to take months.

    Some are counting on tariff exemptions, a popular tool used by companies during the first Trump administration to get goods imported without the taxes.

    Michael Weidner, president of Lalo Baby Products in Brooklyn, is one of them. “We believe there should be an exemption for baby products,” he said. “Same with toys.” 

    The Trump administration has said it will resist creating such carve-outs. And even during the last trade war, it was a complex process. For instance, Lalo imports a “play table” from China that happens to be classified under a customs category that was subject to a 25% tariff under a part of trade law that aims to fight unfair trade practices. So Weidner has been paying 55% tariffs on those, thanks to stacking.

    Trump campaigned on a vow to use tariffs to pull manufacturing back to U.S. shores and collect revenue to help fund a major tax cut. His battle with China quickly spiraled into a conflagration with the U.S. imposing a 145% across-the-board tariff that shut down much of the trade between the world’s two largest economies.

    The agreement to curb the tariffs is part of a larger effort to negotiate individual deals with most of the U.S.’s trading partners.

    PASSING COSTS THROUGH

    On Wednesday, a White House official said the 55% figure represents a sum of a baseline 10% “reciprocal” tariff Trump has imposed on goods from nearly all U.S. trading partners; 20% on all Chinese imports because of punitive measures Trump has imposed on China, Mexico and Canada associated with his accusation that the three facilitate the flow of the opioid fentanyl into the U.S.; and finally pre-existing 25% levies on imports from China that were put in place during Trump’s first term.

    “It sounds like that’s the way he’s thinking of the baseline - 55% - at least for some products," said Greta Peisch, a trade lawyer at Wiley Rein in Washington.

    Ramon van Meer’s business selling filtered shower heads from China may yet survive the trade war, though he's not certain.

    That depends entirely on whether he can can manage the multiple tariffs placed on his $159 shower heads, which became a viral sensation on Instagram.

    When the Trump administration trimmed tariffs on China to 30% in May, van Meer's tariff bill was actually 43%. That's because the 30% tariff was stacked on top of an existing 13% tariff. 

    It's an improvement over the 145% tariffs slapped on Chinese imports in April, when he halted shipments entirely.

    “At least I can afford to pay it,” said van Meer, chief executive of Afina, based in Austin, Texas, referring to his latest calculations. "And I don't have to raise the price by that much."

    (Reporting by Timothy Aeppel in New York with additional reporting by Trevor Hunnicutt in Washington.Editing by Dan Burns and Michael Learmonth)

    Key Takeaways

    • •Tariff stacking increases costs for US importers.
    • •Existing tariffs are compounded by new ones.
    • •US businesses face higher tariff bills than expected.
    • •Companies seek suppliers outside China to reduce costs.
    • •Legal challenges to tariffs are ongoing in US courts.

    Frequently Asked Questions about Tariff 'stacking' adds another headache for US importers

    1What is tariff stacking?

    Tariff stacking occurs when new tariffs are added on top of existing tariffs, leading to a higher total tariff rate for imported goods.

    2How are U.S. businesses affected by tariff stacking?

    Many U.S. businesses face significantly higher tariff bills than the headline rates due to tariff stacking, complicating their import costs.

    3What strategies are businesses using to cope with tariffs?

    Some businesses are searching for suppliers outside of China to avoid high tariffs, while others are hoping for tariff exemptions.

    4What is the current tariff rate for imports from China?

    The current tariff rate for imports from China has been reported as high as 55%, factoring in both new and existing tariffs.

    5Are there any exemptions available for tariffs?

    While some businesses are seeking tariff exemptions, the Trump administration has indicated it will resist creating such carve-outs.

    More from Finance

    Explore more articles in the Finance category

    Image for Germany's Aurelius interested in buying Carrefour's Belgian unit, L'Echo reports
    Germany's Aurelius Interested in Buying Carrefour's Belgian Unit, L'Echo Reports
    Image for Germany's EnBW expects profits to be stable at best in 2026
    Germany's EnBW Expects Profits to Be Stable at Best in 2026
    Image for UK, EU and Switzerland set out one-day settlement testing plan
    Uk, EU and Switzerland Set Out One-Day Settlement Testing Plan
    Image for Taiwan wary that China could exploit US distraction over Middle East war
    Taiwan Wary That China Could Exploit US Distraction Over Middle East War
    Image for Russian attacks knock out power for thousands in Ukraine's north
    Russian Attacks Knock Out Power for Thousands in Ukraine's North
    Image for UK's Headlam warns of revenue drop as Middle East war pushes costs higher
    UK's Headlam Warns of Revenue Drop as Middle East War Pushes Costs Higher
    Image for Hedge fund founder Odey gives evidence in fight against financial industry ban
    Hedge Fund Founder Odey Gives Evidence in Fight Against Financial Industry Ban
    Image for UK's RS Group forecasts annual profit marginally ahead of market view
    UK's Rs Group Forecasts Annual Profit Marginally Ahead of Market View
    Image for Spanish gambling group Codere to go on sale for $2.3 billion, Expansion reports
    Spanish Gambling Group Codere to Go on Sale for $2.3 Billion, Expansion Reports
    Image for UK's ASOS posts 50% profit surge on cost-focussed revamp
    UK's Asos Posts 50% Profit Surge on Cost-Focussed Revamp
    Image for UK inflation holds at 3.0% in February
    UK Inflation Holds at 3.0% in February
    Image for Fastweb + Vodafone terminates agreement with INWIT
    Fastweb + Vodafone Terminates Agreement With Inwit
    View All Finance Posts
    Previous Finance PostSterling Steady on the Dollar as Middle East Conflict Endures, BoE Meeting in Sight
    Next Finance PostRussia Slowly Restarts Gas Flows to Europe via TurkStream as Maintenance Nears Completion