Published by Global Banking & Finance Review®
Posted on June 2, 2025
3 min readLast updated: January 23, 2026
Add as preferred source on GoogleA Zurich law firm challenges the Swiss court's delay in addressing the Credit Suisse AT1 bond write-down case, affecting $19.4 billion in bonds.
By Stefania Spezzati
LONDON (Reuters) -A Zurich-based law firm has filed a complaint with the Swiss Federal Supreme Court challenging a tribunal's delay in addressing investors' claim on the write-down of Credit Suisse bonds, a legal filing seen by Reuters shows.
Hundreds of bondholders in April 2023 sued market regulator FINMA at the Swiss administrative court in St. Gallen to recoup losses on 16 billion Swiss francs ($19.4 billion) of AT1 bonds that were written down when UBS rescued Credit Suisse.There has been no significant activity by the Federal Administrative Court since spring 2024, the filing, submitted in German, shows.
A spokesperson for the Federal Supreme Court confirmed that the court had received the complaint.
The complaint was filed by Zurich-based law firm grosz I poledna, acting for Pallas, the law firm representing the investors, around mid-May, according to a person familiar with the proceedings.
Pallas represents about 800 clients who at the time of the write-down held around $2 billion of Credit Suisse AT1 bonds, a representative for the law firm told Reuters. Pallas declined to comment for the story.
A representative for Switzerland's Federal Administrative court in St. Gallen said: "The proceedings are particularly challenging due to their scope, the high number of parties and the complexity of the legal issues involved, and entail many procedural steps. This is a multi-party procedure, whereby it must also be ensured that all complainants or their legal representatives are granted the right to be heard. We treat the proceedings as a priority."
A spokesperson for FINMA declined to comment.
While questions of an administrative nature were clarified between the second half of 2023 and spring 2024, according to the filing, there have been no "discernible activities" by the Federal Administrative Court, the filing shows.
"While this case is unprecedented for the Swiss courts as there have never been so many appellants challenging one FINMA order, by now it should have progressed as appellants have a right to have their case looked at expeditiously," said Jonas Hertner, a Zurich-based lawyer who had previously represented Credit Suisse AT1 clients at law firm Quinn Emanuel.
The Swiss Federal Supreme Court is the head of the Swiss judiciary system and appellants can file complaints to pressure the administrative court to act.
There is no deadline by which the Supreme Court is required to respond, but complaints of this kind could take a few months, according to lawyers.In October 2023, Reuters reported that the St. Gallen administrative tribunal was weighing whether to grant Credit Suisse investors access to more documents. Back then, some investors had hoped to gain access to filings in a matter of weeks.
The documents, including the responses to the appeal by Credit Suisse and FINMA, have not yet been made public, according to the complaint.
The write-down shocked markets and upended a long-established practice of granting bondholders’ priority over shareholders in a debt recovery. The market has since recovered with UBS tapping the AT1 market after the Credit Suisse rescue.
($1 = 0.8241 Swiss francs)
(Reporting by Stefania Spezzati in London. Additional reporting by Oliver Hirt in Zurich. Editing by Elisa Martinuzzi and Susan Fenton)
The Zurich-based law firm filed a complaint with the Swiss Federal Supreme Court challenging a tribunal's delay in addressing investors' claims regarding the write-down of Credit Suisse AT1 bonds.
Pallas represents about 800 clients who held around $2 billion of Credit Suisse AT1 bonds at the time of the write-down.
The proceedings are particularly challenging due to their scope, the high number of parties involved, and the complexity of the case.
A spokesperson for the Federal Supreme Court confirmed that the court had received the complaint, but there is no deadline for a response.
The write-down shocked markets and disrupted the traditional priority of bondholders over shareholders in debt recovery, although the market has since recovered.
Explore more articles in the Finance category
