Published by Global Banking & Finance Review®
Posted on May 16, 2025
3 min readLast updated: January 23, 2026
Add as preferred source on GoogleIntel is challenging a $421.4 million antitrust fine from EU regulators, arguing it's disproportionate. The case dates back to 2009, with a court ruling expected soon.
By Foo Yun Chee
LUXEMBOURG (Reuters) - U.S. chipmaker Intel on Friday sparred with EU antitrust regulators over a 376 million euro ($421.4 million) fine levied nearly two years ago for excluding rivals from the market, arguing that it was disproportionate and unfair.
The case dated to 2009 when the European Commission slapped a then-record 1.06 billion euro fine on Intel for blocking rival Advanced Micro Devices.
The tech giant managed to convince the General Court, Europe's second-highest, to scrap the penalty in 2022.
Judges however agreed with one part of the Commission's 2009 decision, prompting the EU competition watchdog to re-impose a 376 million euro fine for payments made by Intel to HP, Acer and Lenovo to halt or delay rival products between November 2002 and December 2006.
Such practices are known as naked restrictions and are frowned on by antitrust regulators. Intel then took its case back to the General Court, asking for the new EU decision and penalty to be annulled.
Intel's lawyer said the EU competition enforcer had not taken into account the limited scope of the violations related to HP, Acer and Lenovo.
"The Commission cannot sustain a finding that there was an overall strategy to foreclose competitors from the entire x86 chips market. These were narrow, tactical moves," Daniel Beard told the panel of three judges.
"The naked restrictions can't be treated as in effect of equal weight to each of the pricing practices which were overturned. Nor do they have the same sort of cumulative effect or strategic weight. They, on their own, don't sustain an overall, market-wide strategy finding," he said.
Beard said the Commission had imposed "a wholly disproportionate and unfair" fine.
The EU watchdog rejected Intel's arguments.
"The Commission correctly applied the finding guidelines, and when in doubt, opted in Intel's favour," its lawyer Pedro Caro de Sousa said.
"The fine is clearly not disproportionate to the seriousness of Intel's conduct, amounting to 1% of its turnover on the last year of the infringement, and about 0.5% of its turnover today," he said.
Both Intel and the Commission called on the court to resolve the issue by setting the size of the fine. A ruling is expected in the coming months.
The case is 09:30 T-1129/23 Intel Corporation v Commission.
($1 = 0.8922 euros)
(This story has been corrected to change the number of judges to three, not five, in paragraph 7)
(Reporting by Foo Yun Chee; Editing by Jan Harvey)
The main topic is Intel's legal challenge against a $421.4 million antitrust fine imposed by EU regulators.
Intel was fined for antitrust violations, specifically for payments to companies to delay or halt rival products.
Intel argues that the fine is disproportionate and that the EU Commission did not consider the limited scope of the violations.
Explore more articles in the Finance category
