Headlines
No final agreement at London Sudan conference with Arab powers at odds
Published by Global Banking & Finance Review®
Posted on April 16, 2025
3 min readLast updated: January 24, 2026
Global Banking & Finance Review®
Company
Published by Global Banking & Finance Review®
Posted on April 16, 2025
3 min readLast updated: January 24, 2026
Arab powers failed to agree at the London Sudan conference, highlighting divisions over Sudan's governance and peace efforts.
By Maha El Dahan and Nafisa Eltahir
DUBAI/CAIRO (Reuters) - A top Emirati diplomat said the Gulf state was disappointed at the failure of a London conference this week to find consensus on ending the two-year war in Sudan, as sources blamed differences between Arab states.
Both Sudan's army and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces have drawn on the support of countries in the region, making them key to efforts to end the conflict, which has displaced 13 million people and spread disease and hunger among those remaining.
At a London-hosted meeting on Tuesday, however, the UAE, Egypt and Saudi Arabia disagreed on issues surrounding Sudan's governance, four sources told Reuters.
"There was a clear call from us that we needed unity around, you know, an urgent need first and foremost that Sudan should transition to a independent civilian-led government," said Lana Nusseibeh, assistant minister for political affairs at the UAE's Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
"And that's why ... we were very disappointed that despite the gravity of the situation and the UK's efforts, we were unable to agree on a joint communique yesterday."
Sudan had protested the inclusion of countries including the UAE which it has accused of supporting the RSF including this month at the International Court of Justice, accusations the UAE denies.
The summit also included Egypt, which maintains close ties to the Sudanese army, which has run Sudan since a coup in 2021, as well as Saudi Arabia, which has hosted rounds of failed peace talks.
Two Egyptian security sources said that disagreements were over the insistence by some of the presence of a civilian-led government in Sudan versus a path to end the war and leaving the issue of governance to the Sudanese to decide later on.
But one diplomat present at the talks said the disagreement stemmed from language on state institutions.
Egypt argued for language rejected by others including the UAE as it was seen as legitimising the army regime, while Saudi Arabia supported Egypt's efforts, the source added.
Saudi Arabia's government communications office and the spokesman for the Egyptian foreign ministry did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
The open disagreement between the Arab powers ultimately doomed the communique, the diplomatic source said, and created a further roadblock for future peace efforts.
The disagreements came amid the backdrop of efforts by the RSF to install a parallel government, which it says will represent all of Sudan. Such a government, however, is unlikely to gain wide approval.
The army and RSF had ruled Sudan together since ousting civilians in 2021, before falling out in April 2023 over plans to integrate their forces.
Though the RSF quickly took over swathes of Sudan during the first half of the war, the army has in recent months regained most of central Sudan. The RSF is consolidating its control of the Darfur region in the west, including in recent days during devastating raids of the Zamzam displacement camp which have drawn widespread criticism.
(Reporting by Maha El Dahan in Riyadh and Nafisa Eltahir and Ahmed Shalaby in Cairo, editing by Ed Osmond)
The main topic is the failure of Arab powers to reach consensus at the London Sudan conference regarding Sudan's governance and peace efforts.
The conference failed due to disagreements among Arab states over Sudan's governance and the path to peace.
The UAE, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia were key players in the London Sudan conference.
Explore more articles in the Headlines category
