• Top Stories
  • Interviews
  • Business
  • Finance
  • Banking
  • Technology
  • Investing
  • Trading
  • Videos
  • Awards
  • Magazines
  • Headlines
  • Trends
Close Search
00
GBAF LogoGBAF Logo
  • Top Stories
  • Interviews
  • Business
  • Finance
  • Banking
  • Technology
  • Investing
  • Trading
  • Videos
  • Awards
  • Magazines
  • Headlines
  • Trends
GBAF Logo
  • Top Stories
  • Interviews
  • Business
  • Finance
  • Banking
  • Technology
  • Investing
  • Trading
  • Videos
  • Awards
  • Magazines
  • Headlines
  • Trends

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest news and updates from our team.

Global Banking and Finance Review

Global Banking & Finance Review

Company

    GBAF Logo
    • About Us
    • Profile
    • Wealth
    • Privacy & Cookie Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
    • Advertising
    • Submit Post
    • Latest News
    • Research Reports
    • Press Release

    Global Banking & Finance Review® is a leading financial portal and online magazine offering News, Analysis, Opinion, Reviews, Interviews & Videos from the world of Banking, Finance, Business, Trading, Technology, Investing, Brokerage, Foreign Exchange, Tax & Legal, Islamic Finance, Asset & Wealth Management.
    Copyright © 2010-2024 GBAF Publications Ltd - All Rights Reserved.

    ;
    Editorial & Advertiser disclosure

    Global Banking and Finance Review is an online platform offering news, analysis, and opinion on the latest trends, developments, and innovations in the banking and finance industry worldwide. The platform covers a diverse range of topics, including banking, insurance, investment, wealth management, fintech, and regulatory issues. The website publishes news, press releases, opinion and advertorials on various financial organizations, products and services which are commissioned from various Companies, Organizations, PR agencies, Bloggers etc. These commissioned articles are commercial in nature. This is not to be considered as financial advice and should be considered only for information purposes. It does not reflect the views or opinion of our website and is not to be considered an endorsement or a recommendation. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any information provided with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek Professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. We link to various third-party websites, affiliate sales networks, and to our advertising partners websites. When you view or click on certain links available on our articles, our partners may compensate us for displaying the content to you or make a purchase or fill a form. This will not incur any additional charges to you. To make things simpler for you to identity or distinguish advertised or sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles or links hosted on our site as a commercial article placement. We will not be responsible for any loss you may suffer as a result of any omission or inaccuracy on the website.

    Finance

    Posted By Global Banking and Finance Review

    Posted on April 17, 2025

    Featured image for article about Finance

    By Jefferson Kahinju, Aaron Ross and Monicah Mwangi

    NANDI HILLS, Kenya (Reuters) - A dispute between a British-owned tea plantation and a local community in western Kenya has come to the boil in what could be a sign of turbulent times ahead for tea producers facing a growing backlash over colonial-era injustices.

    On the rolling green hills of the Sitoi estate in Nandi County, more than 100 residents are occupying 350 acres (140 hectares) of land, picking tea and living in huts made of mud and rusty iron sheets while grazing their cattle.

    They say the land was gifted to them in 1986 by Eastern Produce Kenya. EPK, which is majority owned by London-listed Camellia Plc, says the gift was for 202 acres (82 hectares), not the 550 acres (222 hectares) that the local Kimasas farmers' cooperative claims.

    Kimasas chairman Daniel Biwott said his grandfather lived on the land before it was seized by British colonists around 1905 and that reclaiming the disputed 350 acres would right a historical wrong.

    "Nothing has happened all these years," said Biwott, standing among knee-high bushes where he, his father and his grandfather once worked as EPK employees. "This is the time to solve it."

    The standoff follows several violent incidents at estates in Kenya, the world's fourth-leading tea producer. In January, a farm belonging to Sri Lankan-owned Browns Plantations was attacked and more than 100 eucalyptus trees uprooted, according to the Kenya Tea Growers Association (KTGA).

    The industry group said in a statement that "criminal gangs who appear to enjoy political cover" were behind the "Zimbabwe-like illegal land invasion" of Sitoi, referring to seizures of white-owned farms in the early 2000s.

    It said EPK was losing over $200,000 per month and the incidents threaten an industry that accounts for nearly a quarter of Kenya's export revenues and supports 5 million livelihoods.

    Several people working on land issues said the attacks reflect broader frustration with a failure to remedy colonial land grabs.

    "I have tried hard to use the legal system," said Joel Kimutai Bosek, a lawyer who has brought litigation against tea companies and the UK government on behalf of local communities without success. "I think the new or coming generation will be more aggressive."

    FEW REMEDIES

    During the colonial era from 1895-1963, British authorities seized vast tracts of land, much of which became tea plantations, according to a 2021 U.N. report.

    Awareness of historical injustices has grown since 2010, when Kenya established the National Land Commission (NLC) to address the issue, said Samuel Tororei, who was a commissioner until 2019.

    But Tororei said the commission's effectiveness was undermined by its limited mandate and an "unholy marriage" between tea companies and political elites.

    Under Kenya's 2010 constitution, tea companies' previous 999-year leases were reduced to 99 years but activists complain the government has not used its ownership of the land to extract meaningful concessions in land or money for local communities.

    "The underlying cause of tension is that you have overseas owners of large-scale plantations which are based on land that was taken from the community," said Guy Chambers, managing director from 2015-2022 of Britain's James Finlay, which had tea estates in Kenya until 2023.

    Kenyan government spokespeople did not respond to requests for comment. The companies say they comply with Kenyan law and accuse some politicians of exploiting historical tensions to undermine their land tenures and advance personal business interests.

    Other community attempts to reclaim land have yielded little. Legal options are constrained by statutes of limitations and official immunities, the U.N. report said.

    The private equity firm Chambers runs and a community group in the tea-growing county of Kericho jointly bid last year for estates belonging to CVC Capital-owned Lipton in an arrangement that would have fully transferred control to the community within two decades.

    Lipton eventually sold to Browns. A spokesperson for Lipton said it chose the best bidder who could help raise standards in the industry. Browns did not respond to a request for comment.

    In a 2019 report, the NLC called on the British government to apologise to communities in Kericho and provide reparations.

    The British government has not directly responded to that call. Asked for comment, the Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office said: "We are concerned by the attacks on tea farms in Nandi and are in contact with the Kenyan authorities."

    'DANGEROUS PRECEDENT'

    EPK first acquired land in Nandi in 1948. It said the current dispute is not over a historical land injustice but rather a gift made on a "willing donor, willing donee basis".

    The NLC found in 2019 that all 550 acres belonged to Kimasas. EPK contested that in court, saying Kimasas' evidence was forged.

    As litigation proceeded, more than 200 people, including a national lawmaker from the area, overran the disputed plot on August 3, 2023 and began plucking tea. A court issued an injunction the following day, ordering them to leave.

    Most did, but many then returned. In January, squatters attacked a company car and employees, EPK said.

    The company said police have not enforced the injunction, while the public prosecutor's office told it that any prosecutions risked interfering with the civil case.

    "If we allow this kind of situation where the younger generations now start saying they don't have enough and they want more, then it is a dangerous precedent that should be stopped at all costs," said EPK general manager Peter Goin.

    The police and prosecutor's office did not respond to requests for comment. Biwott said Kimasas felt justified occupying the land because there was no final ruling against it.

    (Reporting by Jefferson Kahinju, Aaron Ross and Monicah Mwangi; Editing by Giles Elgood)

    Recommended for you

    • Thumbnail for recommended article

    • Thumbnail for recommended article

    • Thumbnail for recommended article

    Why waste money on news and opinions when you can access them for free?

    Take advantage of our newsletter subscription and stay informed on the go!

    Subscribe