Editorial & Advertiser Disclosure Global Banking And Finance Review is an independent publisher which offers News, information, Analysis, Opinion, Press Releases, Reviews, Research reports covering various economies, industries, products, services and companies. The content available on globalbankingandfinance.com is sourced by a mixture of different methods which is not limited to content produced and supplied by various staff writers, journalists, freelancers, individuals, organizations, companies, PR agencies etc. The information available on this website is purely for educational and informational purposes only. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any of the information provided at globalbankingandfinance.com with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. Globalbankingandfinance.com also links to various third party websites and we cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of the information provided by third party websites.
Links from various articles on our site to third party websites are a mixture of non-sponsored links and sponsored links. Only a very small fraction of the links which point to external websites are affiliate links. Some of the links which you may click on our website may link to various products and services from our partners who may compensate us if you buy a service or product or fill a form or install an app. This will not incur additional cost to you. For avoidance of any doubts and to make it easier, you may consider any links to external websites as sponsored links. Please note that some of the services or products which we talk about carry a high level of risk and may not be suitable for everyone. These may be complex services or products and we request the readers to consider this purely from an educational standpoint. The information provided on this website is general in nature. Global Banking & Finance Review expressly disclaims any liability without any limitation which may arise directly or indirectly from the use of such information.


Senior executives are set to ‘pivot’ in 2017 in response to an increasingly volatile business landscape, according to the world’s largest language consultancy, The Writer, which today announces its predictions for the words that will echo around boardrooms next year.

‘When people use “pivot” in a business context, they rarely mean anything more than “change direction”. But because “pivot” comes from the world of physics, it sounds specific and thought-through, rather than random and panicky. And businesses love borrowing words with that kind of technical feel,’ says Neil Taylor, creative partner at The Writer.

It’s been around for a while (Eric Ries was using it in his ‘lean start-up’ methodology developed in 2008), but it’s starting to hit the mainstream. Blackberry used it three months ago, when it announced it would stop making handsets. And it got a big leg-up in the US election when pundits debated if and when Donald Trump would ‘pivot’ away from some of his more extreme positions.

The Writer’s prediction is supported by the millions of words they read and write every year for their clients, including Fortune 500 companies from across the world. They’ve also analysed data from CEOs’ speeches, websites, corporate literature and business publications to inform their view.

The runners-up: ‘tiger team’ and ‘swim lane’ 

One of the way companies are set to meet the challenges of the year ahead is to create ‘tiger teams’ – a set of diverse experts that will develop solutions to problems. Donald Trump’s transition team was asked whether the President-elect had a ‘tiger team’ in place on a recent media call, while IBM is aiming to recruit new employees to one of its tiger teams.

‘It’s another borrowed phrase. NASA was using it in 1964, but you’re starting to hear it all over’ says Taylor. ‘Obviously if you’re one of the “tigers” it makes you sound cool and go-getting right now, but the danger is that these words get bleached of their meaning if you hear them too much.’

‘“Swim lanes” does the opposite to “tiger team”’, says Taylor. ‘Instead of being about bringing people together, it’s about keeping them apart, so they don’t encroach on each other’s areas of responsibility.’ Hilton Worldwide’s executive vice president of global brands, Jim Holthouser, recently explained how ‘clearly defined swim lanes’ had formed part of the hospitality company’s strategy to drive ‘industry leading…growth’.

‘It’s a relatively friendly metaphor that helps you talk about something which is really annoying in increasingly complex workplaces: people wading into projects that have nothing to do with them. It’s much easier to say “I think we need to stick to our swim lanes”, rather than “Why don’t you mind your own business?”’