Connect with us


Staying on top of changing software licences



Staying on top of changing software licences

Matt Fisher, SVP Product Strategy, Snow Software

As businesses everywhere strive to meet their digital transformation goals of increasing operational efficiencies and seizing new market opportunities, they are increasingly turning to off-the-shelf software and databases.

In fact, global spending on enterprise software, including on licensing, maintenance and SaaS, is expected to reach $391bn by the end of 2018.

However, with this software often being used in ways not originally envisioned by its developers, vendors are having to regularly rethink the ways in which their solutions are licensed in order to capitalise fully on the value they deliver. While ensuring they are getting the most from their technology investments, it’s important that end users stay on top of these changes to avoid unwittingly introducing more cost into their business, or creating potential compliance risks.

For a better understanding of how subscriptions are likely to change, it’s helpful to have an appreciation of current monetisation models, and how technology will work in the future.

Changing metrics

The advent of cloud-first, and even cloud-only, enterprise IT has required software vendors to rework their licensing models to capture revenue not only from the direct use of their solutions, but also from any indirect business value, such as the interaction between one solution with another, rather than with a human. To maximise their licence revenues, vendors must therefore find metrics that capture the full value of their software.

With traditional flat-rate ‘per device’ or ‘per user’ licensing plans no longer capturing the full value of their solutions, vendors are now looking at new ways of tracking and monetising their use. Some, for example, have moved toward a model of monitoring and billing based on the number of transactions processed or records created/edited; a move that, encouragingly for other vendors, has been met with little resistance from customers.

Discovering new use cases

Publishers are beginning to realise that their software isn’t always being used in the ways it was originally intended. Many database developers, for example, hadn’t, until fairly recently, realised that not all of the users accessing their technology were human. Indeed, these non-human users, which include robotic processes and other software, are creating use cases that simply weren’t considered when many applications and databases were first launched.As a result, vendors have been left on the back foot, having to find ways of monetising the increased business value their customers are realising from this ‘unorthodox’ usage.

Although this is expected to be more common as use cases become clearer, and customers become more willing to align their software investments with proven business value, assessing such value with regard to a licence is not straightforward. Software publishers are therefore required to work with their customers to identify the business value of their products. This is a mutually beneficial collaboration; end-users need developers to enhance their solutions to accommodate new use cases, while development of these features requires ongoing investment.

Evolution and complexity

The predominant licensing metric, once ‘per device’, is now ‘per user’, and is expected to further evolve to a form of hybrid licensing schema; one that that combines users, transactions and integrations. This iteration could potentially result in a type of ‘base’ licence for an organisation’s total user base;the integrated systems, which will often incorporate ‘non-human’ users and indirect access; and a ‘premium’ licensing metric based on vendor-defined transactions, and which could be charged in arrears or licensed in the form of purchasing up-front ‘credits’.

Of course, this will make licensing even more complex. But it will also allow end user organisations to better align their software agreements with business values, making it easier for them to understand the cost of business down to individual functions and processes, and adjust their investments accordingly.

To maximise the benefits of this hybrid approach, CIOs and their teams should start thinking like a publisher, and scrutinise how software is used across their business, focusing on how deployed applications align with core business functions, for example, and the key trackable transactions within those functions.

They can take steps to guard against any future surprises that may arise when licensing new applications, or renewing existing agreements with incumbent vendors. Commitment should be sought, for instance, that a vendor won’t enforce any new licensing metrics within a pre-agreed notice period, and longer-term agreements should include the opportunity to review and scale (up and down) at least annually.

It’s not easy to predict the exact form that software licensing will take in the future, but it’s reasonable to expect multi-layered agreements that take into account multiple metrics, and require greater collaboration between vendors and their customers.

Whatever the next evolutionary step, the end user organisation will ultimately need to take more care in managing its use of software, and in tracking its contribution to the overall business. Managing software investments must become part of an organisation’s overall governance and risk management functions, not only to avoid compliance risk, but also to ensure the organisation is operating efficiently, and using those investments to support core business functions. Only this way, will these investments help an organisation meet its digital transformation goals.


Primark owner warns of 1.6 billion pound sales hit from lockdowns



Primark owner warns of 1.6 billion pound sales hit from lockdowns 1

By James Davey

LONDON (Reuters) – Primark-owner AB Foods warned that lost sales from COVID-19 lockdown store closures would amount to 1.58 billion pounds ($2.23 billion) but said it expected strong trading when they reopened.

The group, which does not trade online, said it estimated Primark’s lost sales would be 1.1 billion pounds in the first six months of its financial year to Feb. 27 and 480 million pounds in its second half as restrictions loosened up.

Primark, which has outlets in Britain and several other European states, had 77 stores open on Thursday, or 22% of its retail selling space. By the end of April, it aims to have 310 stores open, or about 83% of its retail space.

“We know that people will welcome us back when we reopen,” finance chief John Bason said. “There is pent-up demand.”

In the past few weeks, Primark stores in Austria, Poland and Slovenia had reopened and were delivering like-for-like sales ahead of last year’s pre-COVID levels, he told Reuters.

Shares in AB Foods were up 0.4% at 0952 GMT, valuing the group at 19.2 billion pounds.

The group expects Primark’s first half sales to be about 2.2 billion pounds, down from 3.7 billion pounds, and adjusted operating profit to be marginally above break-even versus a profit of 441 million pounds.

Primark’s performance meant the overall group’s first half sales and earnings would be lower than the previous year, the company said.

AB Foods has a grocery division, with brands that include Kingsmill bread and Twinings tea, as well as major sugar, agriculture and ingredients businesses.

It forecast revenue and profit in all of these units to be ahead of both expectations and the first half of last year.

Despite the pandemic, the group has continued to open new Primark stores. Six opened in the first half and nine are planned for the second half.

($1 = 0.7070 pounds)

(Reporting by James Davey; Editing by Kate Holton and Edmund Blair)

Continue Reading


Tesla temporarily halts production at Model 3 line in California: Bloomberg News



Tesla temporarily halts production at Model 3 line in California: Bloomberg News 2

(Reuters) – Tesla Inc has told workers it will temporarily halt some production at its car assembly plant in California, Bloomberg News reported on Thursday, citing a person familiar with the matter.

Workers on a Model 3 production line in Fremont were told their line would be down from Feb. 22 until March 7, according to the report. (

The report did not clarify the reason for the halt and Tesla could not be immediately reached for comment.

It was also unclear how much volume or revenue Tesla would lose due to the production halt. The Fremont plant has an annual production capacity of 500,000 Model 3s and Model Ys combined.

Tesla said last month that it might face a temporary impact from a global semiconductor shortage.

Several automakers, including General Motors Co, Volkswagen AG, and Ford Motor Co, are hit by the shortage of chips, forcing them to scale down production.

(Reporting by Munsif Vengattil in Bengaluru; Editing by Shinjini Ganguli and Anil D’silva)

Continue Reading


Decision on UK Vauxhall car plant’s future due



Decision on UK Vauxhall car plant's future due 3

LONDON (Reuters) – Workers at the Vauxhall car plant in north-western England are set to discover if it has a future on Thursday as its owners weigh up Brexit and electrification in a major investment decision.

Parent company PSA said in 2019 it wanted to keep open the site, which employs 1,000 people, by making the new Opel/Vauxhall Astra vehicle there, but that would depend on the outcome of Britain’s departure from the European Union.

Since then, London and Brussels agreed a tariff-free deal dependent on local content levels, PSA merged with Fiat Chrysler to form Stellantis and a UK plan to end the sale of new combustion-engine only cars has been brought forward.

In January, the firm’s boss Carlos Tavares signalled the 2030 ban decision effectively stopped future investment in conventional vehicles in Britain and that the automaker was weighing whether to build electric cars.

A statement will be issued later on Thursday, a Vauxhall spokesman said.

“With so many jobs at stake let’s hope enough can be done to get the right decision,” local lawmaker Justin Madders wrote on Twitter.

(Reporting by Costas Pitas; Editing by Kate Holton)

Continue Reading
Editorial & Advertiser disclosureOur website provides you with information, news, press releases, Opinion and advertorials on various financial products and services. This is not to be considered as financial advice and should be considered only for information purposes. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any information provided with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek Professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. We link to various third party websites, affiliate sales networks, and may link to our advertising partners websites. Though we are tied up with various advertising and affiliate networks, this does not affect our analysis or opinion. When you view or click on certain links available on our articles, our partners may compensate us for displaying the content to you, or make a purchase or fill a form. This will not incur any additional charges to you. To make things simpler for you to identity or distinguish sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles or links hosted on our site as a partner endorsed link.

Call For Entries

Global Banking and Finance Review Awards Nominations 2021
2021 Awards now open. Click Here to Nominate

Latest Articles

Newsletters with Secrets & Analysis. Subscribe Now