Search
00
GBAF Logo
trophy
Top StoriesInterviewsBusinessFinanceBankingTechnologyInvestingTradingVideosAwardsMagazinesHeadlinesTrends

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest news and updates from our team.

Global Banking & Finance Review®

Global Banking & Finance Review® - Subscribe to our newsletter

Company

    GBAF Logo
    • About Us
    • Advertising and Sponsorship
    • Profile & Readership
    • Contact Us
    • Latest News
    • Privacy & Cookies Policies
    • Terms of Use
    • Advertising Terms
    • Issue 81
    • Issue 80
    • Issue 79
    • Issue 78
    • Issue 77
    • Issue 76
    • Issue 75
    • Issue 74
    • Issue 73
    • Issue 72
    • Issue 71
    • Issue 70
    • View All
    • About the Awards
    • Awards Timetable
    • Awards Winners
    • Submit Nominations
    • Testimonials
    • Media Room
    • FAQ
    • Asset Management Awards
    • Brand of the Year Awards
    • Business Awards
    • Cash Management Banking Awards
    • Banking Technology Awards
    • CEO Awards
    • Customer Service Awards
    • CSR Awards
    • Deal of the Year Awards
    • Corporate Governance Awards
    • Corporate Banking Awards
    • Digital Transformation Awards
    • Fintech Awards
    • Education & Training Awards
    • ESG & Sustainability Awards
    • ESG Awards
    • Forex Banking Awards
    • Innovation Awards
    • Insurance & Takaful Awards
    • Investment Banking Awards
    • Investor Relations Awards
    • Leadership Awards
    • Islamic Banking Awards
    • Real Estate Awards
    • Project Finance Awards
    • Process & Product Awards
    • Telecommunication Awards
    • HR & Recruitment Awards
    • Trade Finance Awards
    • The Next 100 Global Awards
    • Wealth Management Awards
    • Travel Awards
    • Years of Excellence Awards
    • Publishing Principles
    • Ownership & Funding
    • Corrections Policy
    • Editorial Code of Ethics
    • Diversity & Inclusion Policy
    • Fact Checking Policy
    Original content: Global Banking and Finance Review - https://www.globalbankingandfinance.com

    A global financial intelligence and recognition platform delivering authoritative insights, data-driven analysis, and institutional benchmarking across Banking, Capital Markets, Investment, Technology, and Financial Infrastructure.

    Copyright © 2010-2026 - All Rights Reserved. | Sitemap | Tags

    Editorial & Advertiser disclosure

    Global Banking & Finance Review® is an online platform offering news, analysis, and opinion on the latest trends, developments, and innovations in the banking and finance industry worldwide. The platform covers a diverse range of topics, including banking, insurance, investment, wealth management, fintech, and regulatory issues. The website publishes news, press releases, opinion and advertorials on various financial organizations, products and services which are commissioned from various Companies, Organizations, PR agencies, Bloggers etc. These commissioned articles are commercial in nature. This is not to be considered as financial advice and should be considered only for information purposes. It does not reflect the views or opinion of our website and is not to be considered an endorsement or a recommendation. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any information provided with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek Professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. We link to various third-party websites, affiliate sales networks, and to our advertising partners websites. When you view or click on certain links available on our articles, our partners may compensate us for displaying the content to you or make a purchase or fill a form. This will not incur any additional charges to you. To make things simpler for you to identity or distinguish advertised or sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles or links hosted on our site as a commercial article placement. We will not be responsible for any loss you may suffer as a result of any omission or inaccuracy on the website.

    1. Home
    2. >Business
    3. >REPUTATION AND RISK MANAGEMENT
    Business

    Reputation and Risk Management

    Published by Gbaf News

    Posted on September 28, 2016

    9 min read

    Last updated: January 22, 2026

    Add as preferred source on Google
    Image of Kim Leadbeater addressing the media about proposed changes to the UK's assisted dying law, emphasizing the removal of High Court judge sign-off to enhance the legislative process.
    Lawmaker Kim Leadbeater discusses UK's assisted dying law changes - Global Banking & Finance Review
    Why waste money on news and opinion when you can access them for free?

    Take advantage of our newsletter subscription and stay informed on the go!

    Subscribe

    Kasper Ulf Nielsen,Executive Partner at Reputation Institute

    Reputation is fast becoming accepted as a board level priority and a business’s licence to operate. It is inextricably linked to a business’s performance, and the companies with the best reputations consistently outperform the stock market by leveraging stakeholder support to operate more efficiently.

    Our research shows that whilst only 14% of the UK general public would buy products from a company with an average reputation, 75% would if a company’s reputation was excellent.This is particularly pertinent to the financial services sector, having experienced serious reputation damage during the financial crash.

    Managing your reputation is critical to achieve business success. To reach their business goals companies need support from a number of stakeholders. They need customers to buy and recommend their products, regulators to give them a license to operate, the financial markets to invest in them, the media to give them fair coverage, and employees to deliver on their strategy. For all these people to do this, they are asking for one thing. That they can trust the company. That the company lives up to its promises. That is has a good reputation.

    In today’s complex and connected world, stakeholders have access to more information about the businesses whose products and services they use than ever before, and they have the ability to impact reputation with as little as a single click. And increasingly, they care as much, if not more, about how companies operate over and above what they’re selling.

    PROACTIVELY COMMUNICATING CULTURE

    Consumers (and regulators for that matter), are increasingly demanding that their banks and other financial institutions act openly and transparently, and those who have responded and communicated accordingly have seen significant improvements to their reputations.

    Our research shows that Nationwide has had the best reputation of all retail banks operating in the UK for the past four years, differentiating itself from others through its mutual status and by leveraging the work it does with the community, and its corporate governance principles, to communicate a positive company culture to the general public.

    Ensuring consumers hear about and remember positive stories is absolutely crucial;60% – 72% of the UK general public claim they are either “neutral or uncertain” about what retail banks are doing to address their reputations in fundamental aspects such as the products & services they offer, and their approach to corporate governance and citizenship. This absence of knowledge presents the sector with a continued reputation risk. Unless banks communicate their corporate story more clearly and compellingly, they will remain open to reputation damage.

    MEASURING REPUTATION

    Reputation is the perception others have of you. It’s a feeling, which makes it intangible. And managing something which is hard to define is difficult. To understand reputation you need to make the intangible tangible. You need to break down your reputation into specific components that you can measure and manage.

    Consider your company’s performance and communications surrounding your products and services, your approach to innovation, the workplace environment, governance, citizenship, leadership and financial performance, and identify where you can improve in each of these areas to create an overall positive reputation.

    You can then also identify the specific impact of a crisis or an issue on each of these dimensions of your business, and on your overall reputation, and manage it.

    REPUTATION RISK MANAGEMENT

    Defending reputation is best achieved from a position of strength. Recent global research of 150 senior-most corporate communicators, public affairs professionals and board members responsible for the reputation strategy of their international businesses, conducted by Reputation Institute, shows that the communications leaders in companies with the strongest reputations not only have a greater focus on reputation measurement, they also proactively identify, anticipate and manage reputation risk to a greater extent than those with average reputations.

     The financial crisis decimated the reputations of many banks and other financial institutions. In Reputation Institute’s ranking of the reputations of retail banks, RBS and Lloyds Banking Group have been consistently behind the pack since 2008, with RBS in particular struggling to rebuild its image, suggesting the financial crisis has had a lasting impact on those hit hardest in terms of both reputation and the businesses’ bottom lines.

    This demonstrates how- once destroyed- reputation is an asset that’s incredibly hard to rebuild, and it is a long journey to winning back consumer trust.

    Having a process in place is essential in order for businesses to move fast to mitigate reputational risk:

    1. IMPACT: Determining the severity of the event on the reputation of your organisation. It is important to understand the different types of reputation risk and their ‘multiplier’ effect. This stage requires an assessment of the impact on the key internal stakeholders, especially when it comes to identifying risks and assessing the likelihood of these crystallising.
    1. READINESS: Establishing the appropriate controls and procedures to respond to the event. This factor defines how mature a company is in its reputation risk management processes, i.e. its ability to manage a negative event if and when it happens. Interviews with key internal stakeholders need to be conducted to understand alignment and capabilities.
    1. MONITORING: Understanding the effect on reputation over the long term. The organisation should adopt a process that tracks progress towards managing and mitigating reputation risk over time.

    Kasper Ulf Nielsen,Executive Partner at Reputation Institute

    Reputation is fast becoming accepted as a board level priority and a business’s licence to operate. It is inextricably linked to a business’s performance, and the companies with the best reputations consistently outperform the stock market by leveraging stakeholder support to operate more efficiently.

    Our research shows that whilst only 14% of the UK general public would buy products from a company with an average reputation, 75% would if a company’s reputation was excellent.This is particularly pertinent to the financial services sector, having experienced serious reputation damage during the financial crash.

    Managing your reputation is critical to achieve business success. To reach their business goals companies need support from a number of stakeholders. They need customers to buy and recommend their products, regulators to give them a license to operate, the financial markets to invest in them, the media to give them fair coverage, and employees to deliver on their strategy. For all these people to do this, they are asking for one thing. That they can trust the company. That the company lives up to its promises. That is has a good reputation.

    In today’s complex and connected world, stakeholders have access to more information about the businesses whose products and services they use than ever before, and they have the ability to impact reputation with as little as a single click. And increasingly, they care as much, if not more, about how companies operate over and above what they’re selling.

    PROACTIVELY COMMUNICATING CULTURE

    Consumers (and regulators for that matter), are increasingly demanding that their banks and other financial institutions act openly and transparently, and those who have responded and communicated accordingly have seen significant improvements to their reputations.

    Our research shows that Nationwide has had the best reputation of all retail banks operating in the UK for the past four years, differentiating itself from others through its mutual status and by leveraging the work it does with the community, and its corporate governance principles, to communicate a positive company culture to the general public.

    Ensuring consumers hear about and remember positive stories is absolutely crucial;60% – 72% of the UK general public claim they are either “neutral or uncertain” about what retail banks are doing to address their reputations in fundamental aspects such as the products & services they offer, and their approach to corporate governance and citizenship. This absence of knowledge presents the sector with a continued reputation risk. Unless banks communicate their corporate story more clearly and compellingly, they will remain open to reputation damage.

    MEASURING REPUTATION

    Reputation is the perception others have of you. It’s a feeling, which makes it intangible. And managing something which is hard to define is difficult. To understand reputation you need to make the intangible tangible. You need to break down your reputation into specific components that you can measure and manage.

    Consider your company’s performance and communications surrounding your products and services, your approach to innovation, the workplace environment, governance, citizenship, leadership and financial performance, and identify where you can improve in each of these areas to create an overall positive reputation.

    You can then also identify the specific impact of a crisis or an issue on each of these dimensions of your business, and on your overall reputation, and manage it.

    REPUTATION RISK MANAGEMENT

    Defending reputation is best achieved from a position of strength. Recent global research of 150 senior-most corporate communicators, public affairs professionals and board members responsible for the reputation strategy of their international businesses, conducted by Reputation Institute, shows that the communications leaders in companies with the strongest reputations not only have a greater focus on reputation measurement, they also proactively identify, anticipate and manage reputation risk to a greater extent than those with average reputations.

     The financial crisis decimated the reputations of many banks and other financial institutions. In Reputation Institute’s ranking of the reputations of retail banks, RBS and Lloyds Banking Group have been consistently behind the pack since 2008, with RBS in particular struggling to rebuild its image, suggesting the financial crisis has had a lasting impact on those hit hardest in terms of both reputation and the businesses’ bottom lines.

    This demonstrates how- once destroyed- reputation is an asset that’s incredibly hard to rebuild, and it is a long journey to winning back consumer trust.

    Having a process in place is essential in order for businesses to move fast to mitigate reputational risk:

    1. IMPACT: Determining the severity of the event on the reputation of your organisation. It is important to understand the different types of reputation risk and their ‘multiplier’ effect. This stage requires an assessment of the impact on the key internal stakeholders, especially when it comes to identifying risks and assessing the likelihood of these crystallising.
    1. READINESS: Establishing the appropriate controls and procedures to respond to the event. This factor defines how mature a company is in its reputation risk management processes, i.e. its ability to manage a negative event if and when it happens. Interviews with key internal stakeholders need to be conducted to understand alignment and capabilities.
    1. MONITORING: Understanding the effect on reputation over the long term. The organisation should adopt a process that tracks progress towards managing and mitigating reputation risk over time.
    More from Business

    Explore more articles in the Business category

    Image for Submit Your Entry for Years of Excellence Awards 2026
    Submit Your Entry for Years of Excellence Awards 2026
    Image for Nominations Open for Travel & Hospitality Awards 2026
    Nominations Open for Travel & Hospitality Awards 2026
    Image for Submit Your Entry Today for Telecom Awards 2026
    Submit Your Entry Today for Telecom Awards 2026
    Image for Submit Your Entries for The Next 100 Global Awards 2026
    Submit Your Entries for the Next 100 Global Awards 2026
    Image for Submit Your Entry: Public Sector & Governance Excellence Awards 2026
    Submit Your Entry: Public Sector & Governance Excellence Awards 2026
    Image for Nominations Invited for Real Estate Development Awards 2026
    Nominations Invited for Real Estate Development Awards 2026
    Image for Submit Your Entry: Process & Product Awards 2026
    Submit Your Entry: Process & Product Awards 2026
    Image for Call for Entries: HR & Recruitment Awards 2026
    Call for Entries: HR & Recruitment Awards 2026
    Image for Submit Your Nominations Today for Education & Training Awards 2026
    Submit Your Nominations Today for Education & Training Awards 2026
    Image for Join the Corporate Governance Awards 2026: Showcase Your Organisation’s Leadership
    Join the Corporate Governance Awards 2026: Showcase Your Organisation’s Leadership
    Image for Submit Your Entry Today for Business Awards 2026
    Submit Your Entry Today for Business Awards 2026
    Image for Decentralized Masters’ ‘family culture’ building trust instead of hierarchy
    Decentralized Masters’ ‘family Culture’ Building Trust Instead of Hierarchy
    View All Business Posts
    Previous Business PostLondon’s Business Community Remains Suprisingly Upbeat on the Economic Outlook – Despite ‘brexit’
    Next Business PostPost-Brexit Ceos Buzzing With Confidence but Cautiously Contingency Planning, According to Latest Kpmg Research