Search
00
GBAF Logo
trophy
Top StoriesInterviewsBusinessFinanceBankingTechnologyInvestingTradingVideosAwardsMagazinesHeadlinesTrends

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest news and updates from our team.

Global Banking & Finance Review®

Global Banking & Finance Review® - Subscribe to our newsletter

Company

    GBAF Logo
    • About Us
    • Advertising and Sponsorship
    • Profile & Readership
    • Contact Us
    • Latest News
    • Privacy & Cookies Policies
    • Terms of Use
    • Advertising Terms
    • Issue 81
    • Issue 80
    • Issue 79
    • Issue 78
    • Issue 77
    • Issue 76
    • Issue 75
    • Issue 74
    • Issue 73
    • Issue 72
    • Issue 71
    • Issue 70
    • View All
    • About the Awards
    • Awards Timetable
    • Awards Winners
    • Submit Nominations
    • Testimonials
    • Media Room
    • FAQ
    • Asset Management Awards
    • Brand of the Year Awards
    • Business Awards
    • Cash Management Banking Awards
    • Banking Technology Awards
    • CEO Awards
    • Customer Service Awards
    • CSR Awards
    • Deal of the Year Awards
    • Corporate Governance Awards
    • Corporate Banking Awards
    • Digital Transformation Awards
    • Fintech Awards
    • Education & Training Awards
    • ESG & Sustainability Awards
    • ESG Awards
    • Forex Banking Awards
    • Innovation Awards
    • Insurance & Takaful Awards
    • Investment Banking Awards
    • Investor Relations Awards
    • Leadership Awards
    • Islamic Banking Awards
    • Real Estate Awards
    • Project Finance Awards
    • Process & Product Awards
    • Telecommunication Awards
    • HR & Recruitment Awards
    • Trade Finance Awards
    • The Next 100 Global Awards
    • Wealth Management Awards
    • Travel Awards
    • Years of Excellence Awards
    • Publishing Principles
    • Ownership & Funding
    • Corrections Policy
    • Editorial Code of Ethics
    • Diversity & Inclusion Policy
    • Fact Checking Policy
    Original content: Global Banking and Finance Review - https://www.globalbankingandfinance.com

    A global financial intelligence and recognition platform delivering authoritative insights, data-driven analysis, and institutional benchmarking across Banking, Capital Markets, Investment, Technology, and Financial Infrastructure.

    Copyright © 2010-2026 - All Rights Reserved. | Sitemap | Tags

    Editorial & Advertiser disclosure

    Global Banking & Finance Review® is an online platform offering news, analysis, and opinion on the latest trends, developments, and innovations in the banking and finance industry worldwide. The platform covers a diverse range of topics, including banking, insurance, investment, wealth management, fintech, and regulatory issues. The website publishes news, press releases, opinion and advertorials on various financial organizations, products and services which are commissioned from various Companies, Organizations, PR agencies, Bloggers etc. These commissioned articles are commercial in nature. This is not to be considered as financial advice and should be considered only for information purposes. It does not reflect the views or opinion of our website and is not to be considered an endorsement or a recommendation. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any information provided with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek Professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. We link to various third-party websites, affiliate sales networks, and to our advertising partners websites. When you view or click on certain links available on our articles, our partners may compensate us for displaying the content to you or make a purchase or fill a form. This will not incur any additional charges to you. To make things simpler for you to identity or distinguish advertised or sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles or links hosted on our site as a commercial article placement. We will not be responsible for any loss you may suffer as a result of any omission or inaccuracy on the website.

    1. Home
    2. >Finance
    3. >Some private credit firms are using accounting tools to mask leverage, Rubric Capital tells investors
    Finance

    Some Private Credit Firms Are Using Accounting Tools to Mask Leverage, Rubric Capital Tells Investors

    Published by Global Banking & Finance Review®

    Posted on February 27, 2026

    3 min read

    Last updated: April 2, 2026

    Add as preferred source on Google
    Featured image depicting the MeridianLink logo, highlighting the company's acquisition by Centerbridge Partners for $2 billion. This deal signifies a growing trend in private equity buyouts within the finance sector.
    MeridianLink financial software firm announcement of $2 billion acquisition by Centerbridge - Global Banking & Finance Review
    Why waste money on news and opinion when you can access them for free?

    Take advantage of our newsletter subscription and stay informed on the go!

    Subscribe

    Tags:FinanceBankingMarketsPrivate CreditDirect LendingBDCsaccountingleverage

    Quick Summary

    Rubric Capital warned investors that some retail-facing private credit lenders (BDCs) may be temporarily moving repo-like borrowings off balance sheet around quarter-end to make leverage look lower—then bringing the debt back days later—raising governance and distribution-cut concerns. The claims co

    Rubric warns some private credit BDCs may be masking leverage

    Report highlights concerns over BDC accounting and investor liquidity

    Rubric Capital letter raises leverage-masking allegations

    By Nell Mackenzie

    LONDON, Feb 26 (Reuters) - Some private credit firms that borrow from retail investors may be embellishing their financial health, Rubric Capital, a $3 billion hedge fund founded by a former Point72 star manager, warned its backers in a letter seen by Reuters.  

    The hedge fund said some business development companies (BDCs), which lend to small enterprises, are shifting borrowings from the balance sheet between quarters, making them appear less indebted, the February 18 letter shows. The debt then reappears on the balance sheet a few days after quarter end, it added.

    "Our key takeaway from this behavior is that distribution cuts are so worrisome that some bad actors are playing Enron-like accounting games," the letter said. 

    The firms are using repo-like loans from one particular investment bank to mask debt, the letter says.

    Rubric Capital did not name the bank nor the BDCs involved and Reuters was unable to independently verify whether this practice is being deployed and at what scale.  

    Rubric Capital declined to comment when contacted by Reuters.

    Private credit market scrutiny after recent bankruptcies

    The private credit market has been gripped by anxiety in recent months since the bankruptcies of auto-parts maker First Brands and subprime lender Tricolor last year. The fallout has sharpened scrutiny of a market that has grown quickly, drawing large institutional investment and rising corporate lending in recent years. A renewed bout of uncertainty has flared up in recent weeks. 

    The BDC industry oversees over $300 billion in assets under management and accounts for roughly one quarter of direct lending in the U.S., according to a Bank for International Settlements note in July. The closed-end investment vehicles can be private or listed on stock exchanges.

    Enron comparison and background on Rubric founder

    Enron went bankrupt in 2001 after using off-balance-sheet vehicles and other accounting tricks to hide tens of billions of dollars of debt.    

    Before starting Rubric, founder David Rosen worked for 10 years at Point72, formerly called SAC Capital, and began his career at the Blackstone Group in restructuring, according to a Morgan Stanley note from June. The firm as of May 2025, oversaw around $3 billion in assets, said Morgan Stanley.

    Redemption risk and distribution pressure in privately traded BDCs

    REDEMPTION FEAR

    Private credit defaults are reportedly between 3% and 5%, and signs of strain—such as interest paid-in-kind financing used to help troubled lenders meet their debt obligations—are nearing post-pandemic highs, according to UBS.

    Privately traded BDCs require quarterly liquidity for investors but these funds limit the amount investors can redeem at 5%, the Rubric Capital letter added. If redemption requests reach 10% of net assets, investors can eventually become locked out of their money as the funds halt any further flows.

    Rising costs and an ever-present investor demand for distributions have put BDC managers under pressure, said Rubric Capital.

    "This is leading to dodgy industry behavior with funds increasing leverage instead of taking their medicine and reducing distributions," said the hedge fund's letter.

    (Reporting by Nell Mackenzie; Additional reporting by Isla Binnie; editing by Dhara Ranasinghe, Anousha Sakoui and Elisa Martinuzzi )

    References

    • bdc-20241231
    • Do the Recent Bankruptcies of First Brands and Tricolor Suggest Trouble Ahead in Private Credit? - Cambridge Associates

    Table of Contents

    • Report highlights concerns over BDC accounting and investor liquidity
    • Rubric Capital letter raises leverage-masking allegations
    • Private credit market scrutiny after recent bankruptcies

    Key Takeaways

    • •Window-dressing risk: Rubric alleges certain BDCs may be using short-term, repo-like financing to shift debt off balance sheet at quarter-end, potentially overstating balance-sheet strength and masking true leverage; Reuters could not independently verify the practice or its scale.
    • •Liquidity mismatch remains a core investor risk in nontraded BDCs: many offer quarterly tender/repurchase programs that are typically capped around 5% (and can be amended/suspended), meaning redemption pressure can quickly translate into gates or halted repurchases if demand rises. ()

    Frequently Asked Questions about Some private credit firms are using accounting tools to mask leverage, Rubric Capital tells investors

    1What did Rubric Capital warn investors about in its letter?

    Rubric Capital said some private credit firms, including certain business development companies (BDCs), may be using accounting tactics that make them appear less indebted than they are.

  • Enron comparison and background on Rubric founder
  • Redemption risk and distribution pressure in privately traded BDCs
  • REDEMPTION FEAR
  • sec.gov
  • •Why scrutiny is rising: high-profile problem credits and bankruptcies (including First Brands and Tricolor) have sharpened investor focus on transparency, collateral practices and off-balance-sheet financing exposures across private and traditional credit channels. (cambridgeassociates.com)
  • 2How are the BDCs allegedly making leverage look lower around quarter-end?

    The letter said some BDCs shift borrowings off the balance sheet between quarters so debt appears reduced at quarter-end, then the debt reappears a few days after the quarter ends.

    3What type of financing did Rubric Capital say is being used to mask debt?

    Rubric said the firms are using repo-like loans from one particular investment bank to mask debt, without naming the bank or the BDCs involved.

    4How large is the BDC industry and what role does it play in U.S. direct lending?

    According to a Bank for International Settlements note cited in the article, the BDC industry oversees over $300 billion in assets under management and accounts for roughly one quarter of direct lending in the U.S.

    5What redemption limits and lockout risk did the letter describe for privately traded BDCs?

    The letter said privately traded BDCs provide quarterly liquidity but typically limit investor redemptions to 5%; if redemption requests reach 10% of net assets, investors can eventually become locked out as funds halt further flows.

    More from Finance

    Explore more articles in the Finance category

    Image for War spurs EU plan for electricity tax cuts, faster shift from fossil fuels, draft shows
    War Spurs EU Plan for Electricity Tax Cuts, Faster Shift From Fossil Fuels, Draft Shows
    Image for Nominations Open: Recruitment Technology Innovation of the Year 2026
    Nominations Open: Recruitment Technology Innovation of the Year 2026
    Image for Recruitment Industry Supplier of the Year 2026: Nominations Now Open
    Recruitment Industry Supplier of the Year 2026: Nominations Now Open
    Image for Apply Now: Recruitment Industry Entrepreneur of the Year 2026
    Apply Now: Recruitment Industry Entrepreneur of the Year 2026
    Image for Organisations Invited to Compete for Best Workforce Diversity Initiative 2026
    Organisations Invited to Compete for Best Workforce Diversity Initiative 2026
    Image for BoE's Bailey sees major cybersecurity risks in new Anthropic model
    BoE's Bailey Sees Major Cybersecurity Risks in New Anthropic Model
    Image for Nominations Open: Most Effective Recruitment Marketing Campaign 2026
    Nominations Open: Most Effective Recruitment Marketing Campaign 2026
    Image for Apply Now for Most Effective Employer Brand Development 2026
    Apply Now for Most Effective Employer Brand Development 2026
    Image for Apply Now for Best Talent Acquisition Strategy 2026
    Apply Now for Best Talent Acquisition Strategy 2026
    Image for Entries Are Now Open for Best Specialist Job Board 2026
    Entries Are Now Open for Best Specialist Job Board 2026
    Image for Nominations Open: Best Regional Job Board 2026
    Nominations Open: Best Regional Job Board 2026
    Image for Calling Entries: Best New HR & Recruitment Company 2026
    Calling Entries: Best New HR & Recruitment Company 2026
    View All Finance Posts
    Previous Finance PostHolcim Positive on Infrastructure Construction for 2026
    Next Finance PostAcerinox Reports Quarterly Loss but Flags 2026 Recovery