Published by Global Banking & Finance Review®
Posted on April 16, 2026
3 min readLast updated: April 16, 2026
Add as preferred source on GoogleInsurers Lloyd’s and Arch argue the 2022 Nord Stream pipeline explosions fall under war or government‐ordered exclusions in their policies, aiming to avoid paying nearly €580 million in damages.
By Sam Tobin
LONDON, April 16 (Reuters) - The Nord Stream gas pipelines were attacked in 2022 as a direct result of Russia's invasion of Ukraine, insurers told a London court on Thursday as they seek to avoid paying out nearly 580 million euros ($684 million) over blasts that hit the pipelines.
Nord Stream is suing Lloyd's and Arch Insurance over explosions in September 2022 that ruptured pipelines carrying Russian gas under the Baltic Sea to Germany.
The explosions – for which no state has taken responsibility - largely severed Russian gas supplies to Europe, marking a major escalation in the conflict and squeezing energy supplies.
Two Ukrainians have been arrested in Italy and Poland respectively at the request of German prosecutors after traces of explosives were found on a boat linked to the blasts.
Russia has accused Ukraine of being behind the attack, but Kyiv has repeatedly denied any involvement.
Switzerland-based Nord Stream's lawsuit centres on damage to the Nord Stream 1 pipelines and argues it is entitled to an indemnity of just under 580 million euros.
INSURERS FIGHT LAWSUIT OVER 2022 EXPLOSIONS
Lawyers representing Lloyd's and Arch say Nord Stream's insurance policy excludes damage caused by war or under the order of any government.
The insurers' lawyer, Simon Salzedo, said in court documents that geopolitical experts agreed the blasts could only have been carried out by state actors from Ukraine, Russia or the U.S., or "sub-state actors" from Ukraine with state help.
The trial at London's High Court will see the insurers seek to show that the 2022 explosions were linked to the Ukraine war or ordered by a state.
Investigators in Germany and Sweden have spent years trying to establish responsibility. Italy extradited a Ukrainian national to Germany last year, but a Polish court refused to extradite a second suspect.
Salzedo said the insurers did not need to prove who carried out the attack or why, but only that it is more likely than not a state was involved or that the blasts were influenced by the Ukraine war.
Nord Stream's lawyers said no expert could identify which government, if any, was responsible and that "the only presently established fact is that the Ukrainian state ... has repeatedly and specifically denied any involvement".
($1 = 0.8475 euros)
(Reporting by Sam Tobin. Editing by Mark Potter)
Insurers argue that the 2022 Nord Stream pipeline blasts were war-related, which is excluded in the policy, and thus they are not liable for the €580 million payout.
Switzerland-based Nord Stream is suing Lloyd's and Arch Insurance, seeking nearly €580 million in indemnity for the pipeline damage.
Insurers state the policy excludes damage caused by war or actions ordered by any government, and claim the explosions are linked to the Ukraine conflict.
No state has taken responsibility for the explosions, and investigations have not definitively identified who was responsible.
The trial will decide if the blasts are covered by insurance or excluded as war-related, with nearly €580 million in payout at stake.
Explore more articles in the Finance category
