Editorial & Advertiser Disclosure Global Banking And Finance Review is an independent publisher which offers News, information, Analysis, Opinion, Press Releases, Reviews, Research reports covering various economies, industries, products, services and companies. The content available on globalbankingandfinance.com is sourced by a mixture of different methods which is not limited to content produced and supplied by various staff writers, journalists, freelancers, individuals, organizations, companies, PR agencies Sponsored Posts etc. The information available on this website is purely for educational and informational purposes only. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any of the information provided at globalbankingandfinance.com with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. Globalbankingandfinance.com also links to various third party websites and we cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of the information provided by third party websites. Links from various articles on our site to third party websites are a mixture of non-sponsored links and sponsored links. Only a very small fraction of the links which point to external websites are affiliate links. Some of the links which you may click on our website may link to various products and services from our partners who may compensate us if you buy a service or product or fill a form or install an app. This will not incur additional cost to you. A very few articles on our website are sponsored posts or paid advertorials. These are marked as sponsored posts at the bottom of each post. For avoidance of any doubts and to make it easier for you to differentiate sponsored or non-sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles on our site or all links to external websites as sponsored . Please note that some of the services or products which we talk about carry a high level of risk and may not be suitable for everyone. These may be complex services or products and we request the readers to consider this purely from an educational standpoint. The information provided on this website is general in nature. Global Banking & Finance Review expressly disclaims any liability without any limitation which may arise directly or indirectly from the use of such information.


  • Flexible working proves to a popular employee incentive, with 35% of the public selecting it as their favourite perk.
  • But one in three also worry that remote working could damage the traditional office environment.
  • For Flexible Working Awareness Day, Direct365 urges employers to consider all aspects of remote working.

Research from facilities and building maintenance specialists Direct 365 has discovered that flexible working is the most favoured perk among employees in the UK, with 35% of participants listing it as their top one.

However, further research by the company also showed that flexible working may not necessarily be the saving grace everyone was hoping for, with one in three people expressing concern that traditional office culture could be lost if more of their colleagues work remotely.

In June 2014, all employees in the UK were given the right to request flexible working from their employer after 26 weeks of employment, as the government attempted to encourage a more favourable work-life balance nationwide.

For this year’s Flexible Working Awareness Day, taking place on 6th May, Direct365 is encouraging all businesses to consider the pros and cons of flexible working before implementing such a policy.

Pro – Expand your talent pool

Constraints such as distance from the workplace and family life mean that not everyone can always work standard nine-to-five hours. Flexible working allows you to hire the people you really want working for you, regardless of their location.

Alex Boa, Director at hfx discusses how remote working expands recruitment options for businesses:

“By providing suitable working arrangements for those workers that have difficulty working traditional rigid hours, businesses are gaining access to a talented and very experienced pool of people. Technology has been an enabling force for much that has changed in recent years; work email and networks are now accessible from mobile devices, enabling people to work from any location. Harnessing technology means that flexible working can now be provided on a more formal basis, with visibility ensuring that employees work their contracted hours, and receive the credit for the work they do.”

Con – A lack of office ambience

While flexible working does come with its advantages, further research by Direct365 revealed that it may not be the answer that businesses were hoping for. With 31% believing that remote working could be damaging to the traditional office culture, companies should consider the impact such a policy could have on team morale.

Phil Turner, Head of Digital at Direct365, commented on the effects flexible can have on the ambience in an office:

“Policies such as flexible working can be mutually beneficial for employers and employees alike, when they are implemented sensibly. However, a lot of businesses are clearly struggling to find the right balance.

“It’s not uncommon for someone to be sat at their desk all on their own for an entire day because the rest of their team are either working from home or have been given permission to switch their hours. Technological advancements have made communication easy, but you really shouldn’t underestimate the importance of face-to-face contact. We’re in danger of losing good old-fashioned ‘watercooler talk’!”

Pro – Take up less space and cut the costs

Businesses everywhere are looking to cut back costs. Flexible working could be one such way to make that happen.

Peter Ames, Head of Strategy at OfficeGenie.co.uk, discusses how remote working can save businesses money:

“It should mean your business requires a smaller real estate footprint – in theory companies shouldn’t need quite as much office space and therefore can save money. Office space can be expensive so anything you can do to cut this cost can be hugely beneficial. Ultimately, if you’ve got 20 staff but everyone is allowed to work remotely, you may only need desk space for 15; in theory it can be a money saving option.

“Alternatively a business could make money by renting out any spare desks that would otherwise have been occupied by the employees now working remotely. Desk sharing can bring all sorts of collaborative benefits, and if instigating flexible working can be the first step towards this – that can only be a good thing.”

Con – Perceived workload

Employers will have to take steps to ensure that those who don’t want to benefit from a flexible working policy don’t feel hard done by. And, at the same time, they will have to introduce measures to ensure work is still being completed.

Georgette Stewart, Director of NSK Consultants, discusses this potential problem:

“There is a great deal of responsibility on both the worker and manager to make sure productivity is the same as the staff in the office, and this may only be the perception of others. This means that other staff might perceive the workload of those working from home as easier, as they’re not experiencing the same environment as typical office-based staff.”