Editorial & Advertiser Disclosure Global Banking And Finance Review is an independent publisher which offers News, information, Analysis, Opinion, Press Releases, Reviews, Research reports covering various economies, industries, products, services and companies. The content available on globalbankingandfinance.com is sourced by a mixture of different methods which is not limited to content produced and supplied by various staff writers, journalists, freelancers, individuals, organizations, companies, PR agencies Sponsored Posts etc. The information available on this website is purely for educational and informational purposes only. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any of the information provided at globalbankingandfinance.com with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. Globalbankingandfinance.com also links to various third party websites and we cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of the information provided by third party websites. Links from various articles on our site to third party websites are a mixture of non-sponsored links and sponsored links. Only a very small fraction of the links which point to external websites are affiliate links. Some of the links which you may click on our website may link to various products and services from our partners who may compensate us if you buy a service or product or fill a form or install an app. This will not incur additional cost to you. A very few articles on our website are sponsored posts or paid advertorials. These are marked as sponsored posts at the bottom of each post. For avoidance of any doubts and to make it easier for you to differentiate sponsored or non-sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles on our site or all links to external websites as sponsored . Please note that some of the services or products which we talk about carry a high level of risk and may not be suitable for everyone. These may be complex services or products and we request the readers to consider this purely from an educational standpoint. The information provided on this website is general in nature. Global Banking & Finance Review expressly disclaims any liability without any limitation which may arise directly or indirectly from the use of such information.

MOBILITY BENEFITS PUT AT RISK BY COMPANIES’ INATTENTION TO WORK-LIFE BALANCE AND SECURITY ISSUES, SAYS ECONOMIST INTELLIGENCE UNIT

The proliferation of mobile devices is driving an array of positive changes in workplace culture and how we work. But these always-on mini-computers are also upending our sense of “work-life” balance, fanning executive anxieties about security and privacy, and forcing IT departments to overhaul their information-security approaches, according to The personalisation challenge: business culture and mobile security, an Economist Intelligence Unit report, sponsored by HP Networking.

mobility
mobility

The research, which includes a global survey of 316 executives conducted in January 2013 and in-depth interviews with mobility experts, indicates that companies still have considerable work to do to manage these cultural shifts, address the security issues and make policy changes. Those who overcome these challenges will reap the full benefits of the mobile revolution.

The key findings include:

Employees and employers alike are embracing the benefits of a highly connected work style. Almost one-half (49%) of survey respondents say that using mobile devices boosts innovation, and many feel they are more on top of their jobs (39%) and more efficient (37%). They also say mobility is making their companies more dynamic and innovative (49%) and improving communications (42%). Organisational structures are becoming flatter and less hierarchical.

Personal and work lives continue to blur—for good and ill. Today’s workers are embracing the flexibility, freedom and productivity improvements that come with mobility, but many struggle with the increased intrusion of work into personal time. Only 33% of respondents say their work-life balance has improved and a mere 29% believe that they set effective boundaries.

Security knowledge is lacking. Executives are worried about mobile security and privacy, yet lack security knowledge, suggesting workplace training is inadequate. Communication of company policies is oftenpassive and enforcement anaemic. More executives believe these policies reflect compliance needs (58%) than actual risks (49%), and nearly one in four (23%) admit to skirting the rules.

Companies are embracing mobility, but offer limited support for personal devices. Some 58% of respondents say their company provides job-related mobile apps. Yet only 51% rate IT support for employee-owned mobile devices that are used for work as “strong” or “very strong”.

The personalisation challenge: business culture and mobile security
is available free of charge at
http://www.managementthinking.eiu.com/personalisation-challenge.html