Search
00
GBAF Logo
trophy
Top StoriesInterviewsBusinessFinanceBankingTechnologyInvestingTradingVideosAwardsMagazinesHeadlinesTrends

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest news and updates from our team.

Global Banking & Finance Review®

Global Banking & Finance Review® - Subscribe to our newsletter

Company

    GBAF Logo
    • About Us
    • Profile
    • Privacy & Cookie Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
    • Advertising
    • Submit Post
    • Latest News
    • Research Reports
    • Press Release
    • Awards▾
      • About the Awards
      • Awards TimeTable
      • Submit Nominations
      • Testimonials
      • Media Room
      • Award Winners
      • FAQ
    • Magazines▾
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 79
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 78
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 77
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 76
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 75
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 73
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 71
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 70
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 69
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 66
    Top StoriesInterviewsBusinessFinanceBankingTechnologyInvestingTradingVideosAwardsMagazinesHeadlinesTrends

    Global Banking & Finance Review® is a leading financial portal and online magazine offering News, Analysis, Opinion, Reviews, Interviews & Videos from the world of Banking, Finance, Business, Trading, Technology, Investing, Brokerage, Foreign Exchange, Tax & Legal, Islamic Finance, Asset & Wealth Management.
    Copyright © 2010-2026 GBAF Publications Ltd - All Rights Reserved. | Sitemap | Tags | Developed By eCorpIT

    Editorial & Advertiser disclosure

    Global Banking & Finance Review® is an online platform offering news, analysis, and opinion on the latest trends, developments, and innovations in the banking and finance industry worldwide. The platform covers a diverse range of topics, including banking, insurance, investment, wealth management, fintech, and regulatory issues. The website publishes news, press releases, opinion and advertorials on various financial organizations, products and services which are commissioned from various Companies, Organizations, PR agencies, Bloggers etc. These commissioned articles are commercial in nature. This is not to be considered as financial advice and should be considered only for information purposes. It does not reflect the views or opinion of our website and is not to be considered an endorsement or a recommendation. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any information provided with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek Professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. We link to various third-party websites, affiliate sales networks, and to our advertising partners websites. When you view or click on certain links available on our articles, our partners may compensate us for displaying the content to you or make a purchase or fill a form. This will not incur any additional charges to you. To make things simpler for you to identity or distinguish advertised or sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles or links hosted on our site as a commercial article placement. We will not be responsible for any loss you may suffer as a result of any omission or inaccuracy on the website.

    Home > Finance > LATE PAYMENTS: WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE?
    Finance

    LATE PAYMENTS: WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE?

    Published by Gbaf News

    Posted on February 3, 2018

    8 min read

    Last updated: January 21, 2026

    This image showcases a graph depicting the recent cuts to China's lending benchmarks. It highlights the People's Bank of China's strategy to revive a faltering economy affected by a property crisis and COVID resurgence. The cuts aim to stimulate growth while managing inflation risks.
    Graph illustrating China's lending rate cuts to boost economy amid COVID resurgence - Global Banking & Finance Review
    Why waste money on news and opinion when you can access them for free?

    Take advantage of our newsletter subscription and stay informed on the go!

    Subscribe

    By Jason Braidwood FCICM(Grad), Head of Credit & Collections at Creditsafe

    It was revealed by KPMG last month that only 17 large Scottish companies have complied with the latest regulation aimed at tackling late payments, despite the fact that almost 900 companies fit the legislation’s criteria.

    Coming into effect last April, the payment practices and performance reporting (PPPR) regulations were introduced by the UK government to support SMEs concerned about late payments, and demand that large companies produce a report on their payment practices, policies and results every six months – with the first due in December last year.

    This finding from KPMG is hardly surprising. It was recently reported that the UK’s late payment culture is the worst in the world, with UK businesses wasting an average of 15 working days every year chasing payments. Creditsafe data backs this up and shows that on average 60% of UK businesses were chasing invoices beyond payment terms at any one time, accounting for an average of 2.38 million invoices that were classified as unpaid in 2017.

    But, what happens when you dig a little deeper?

    Using our data, we’ve analysed the payment performance of the 17 core business and public sectors (Construction, Education, Energy Supply, Entertainment, Financial, Health & Social Care, Hospitality, International Bodies, IT, Manufacturing, Mining, Professional Services, Public Administration, Real Estate, Transport, Water & Waste and Wholesale), to assess which were the best and worst paying, and where the UK economy stands in 2018.

    On the up

    The disappointing reality is that paying late has become a habitual British norm in business.The domino effect results in a dangerous cycle – clients are late to pay businesses and so businesses are late to pay their suppliers. The cycle then repeats itself.  However, while it is a significant issue, it must also be recognised that not all sectors are failing to improve when it comes to tackling payments.

    The best paying sector at the end of 2017 was the PublicServices and Administration sector having reduced its DBT (Days Beyond Terms) – how long it takes a business to pay its bills past the due date – by nearly 8 days over the last two months.The Education sector brought its annual average monthly DBT under double figures to 8.2 days. Meanwhile, another sector that impressed was the Financial sector, which achieved the biggest drop in payment days when comparing the start and end of 2017.

    Looking at the broader picture, the close of 2017 saw a slight improvement in payment performance for the majority of industries, leaving us with glimmer of hope for the coming year. 11 out of the 17 sectors we track decreased their DBT at the end of year.

    In the red

    While the majority of sectors improved, there were still some extremely high figures in the mix.The sector that had the highest average monthly DBT score last year was the Energy Supply industry, which stood at 14.4 days. Also moving in the wrong direction was the Transport industry, which finished the year by adding an extra day to its payment practices – something it will be keen to reverse in 2018.

    So, what next?

    Our data shows that the average DBT score in the last three months of 2017 was 12.7 days, which happily is a decrease of 1.5days on the same timeframe in 2016. However, in the grand scheme of things, is this really a cause for celebration? Not when you consider that payments remain late, and several weeks after the agreed terms.

    Unfortunately, chasing late payment has a stigma attached to it. Despite the fact that waiting for unpaid bills directly impacts businesses, particularly SMEs awaiting payment from larger corporates, chasing late payment is often viewed as an action that could compromise good, long-term client relationships.

    The collapse of Carillion is a prime example and has brought much needed attention back to the late payment epidemic that plagues the nation. It’s been claimed the construction giant could owe up to 30,000 businesses around £1bn in unpaid payments, which its 120 day payment terms largely contributed to.Confusing matters, Carillion was actually a signatory of the prompt payment code, a regulation implemented to tackle the issue of late payment. Despite signing up to the voluntary code, the FSB has revealed that some SME suppliers were still having to wait four months or longer to settle bills with the company.

    It’s clear then, that what we have is a cultural issue that needs greater transparency to drive improvements. We ended the year with some advances in timely payments, so let’s cautiously hope that we learn from recent events and that better payment behaviour is on the horizon as we press further into 2018.

    By Jason Braidwood FCICM(Grad), Head of Credit & Collections at Creditsafe

    It was revealed by KPMG last month that only 17 large Scottish companies have complied with the latest regulation aimed at tackling late payments, despite the fact that almost 900 companies fit the legislation’s criteria.

    Coming into effect last April, the payment practices and performance reporting (PPPR) regulations were introduced by the UK government to support SMEs concerned about late payments, and demand that large companies produce a report on their payment practices, policies and results every six months – with the first due in December last year.

    This finding from KPMG is hardly surprising. It was recently reported that the UK’s late payment culture is the worst in the world, with UK businesses wasting an average of 15 working days every year chasing payments. Creditsafe data backs this up and shows that on average 60% of UK businesses were chasing invoices beyond payment terms at any one time, accounting for an average of 2.38 million invoices that were classified as unpaid in 2017.

    But, what happens when you dig a little deeper?

    Using our data, we’ve analysed the payment performance of the 17 core business and public sectors (Construction, Education, Energy Supply, Entertainment, Financial, Health & Social Care, Hospitality, International Bodies, IT, Manufacturing, Mining, Professional Services, Public Administration, Real Estate, Transport, Water & Waste and Wholesale), to assess which were the best and worst paying, and where the UK economy stands in 2018.

    On the up

    The disappointing reality is that paying late has become a habitual British norm in business.The domino effect results in a dangerous cycle – clients are late to pay businesses and so businesses are late to pay their suppliers. The cycle then repeats itself.  However, while it is a significant issue, it must also be recognised that not all sectors are failing to improve when it comes to tackling payments.

    The best paying sector at the end of 2017 was the PublicServices and Administration sector having reduced its DBT (Days Beyond Terms) – how long it takes a business to pay its bills past the due date – by nearly 8 days over the last two months.The Education sector brought its annual average monthly DBT under double figures to 8.2 days. Meanwhile, another sector that impressed was the Financial sector, which achieved the biggest drop in payment days when comparing the start and end of 2017.

    Looking at the broader picture, the close of 2017 saw a slight improvement in payment performance for the majority of industries, leaving us with glimmer of hope for the coming year. 11 out of the 17 sectors we track decreased their DBT at the end of year.

    In the red

    While the majority of sectors improved, there were still some extremely high figures in the mix.The sector that had the highest average monthly DBT score last year was the Energy Supply industry, which stood at 14.4 days. Also moving in the wrong direction was the Transport industry, which finished the year by adding an extra day to its payment practices – something it will be keen to reverse in 2018.

    So, what next?

    Our data shows that the average DBT score in the last three months of 2017 was 12.7 days, which happily is a decrease of 1.5days on the same timeframe in 2016. However, in the grand scheme of things, is this really a cause for celebration? Not when you consider that payments remain late, and several weeks after the agreed terms.

    Unfortunately, chasing late payment has a stigma attached to it. Despite the fact that waiting for unpaid bills directly impacts businesses, particularly SMEs awaiting payment from larger corporates, chasing late payment is often viewed as an action that could compromise good, long-term client relationships.

    The collapse of Carillion is a prime example and has brought much needed attention back to the late payment epidemic that plagues the nation. It’s been claimed the construction giant could owe up to 30,000 businesses around £1bn in unpaid payments, which its 120 day payment terms largely contributed to.Confusing matters, Carillion was actually a signatory of the prompt payment code, a regulation implemented to tackle the issue of late payment. Despite signing up to the voluntary code, the FSB has revealed that some SME suppliers were still having to wait four months or longer to settle bills with the company.

    It’s clear then, that what we have is a cultural issue that needs greater transparency to drive improvements. We ended the year with some advances in timely payments, so let’s cautiously hope that we learn from recent events and that better payment behaviour is on the horizon as we press further into 2018.

    More from Finance

    Explore more articles in the Finance category

    Image for Canadian pension funds to exit UK's Associated British Ports in 10 billion pounds deal, FT reports
    Canadian pension funds to exit UK's Associated British Ports in 10 billion pounds deal, FT reports
    Image for Software sell-off threatens to delay Visma's London IPO, FT reports
    Software sell-off threatens to delay Visma's London IPO, FT reports
    Image for Rio Tinto expected to push for more time to weigh Glencore deal, sources say
    Rio Tinto expected to push for more time to weigh Glencore deal, sources say
    Image for HP, Dell, Acer and Asus mull using Chinese memory chips amid supply crunch, Nikkei Asia reports
    HP, Dell, Acer and Asus mull using Chinese memory chips amid supply crunch, Nikkei Asia reports
    Image for Google goes from laggard to leader as it pulls ahead of OpenAI with stellar AI growth
    Google goes from laggard to leader as it pulls ahead of OpenAI with stellar AI growth
    Image for UAW, Volkswagen reach tentative deal at Tennessee plant 
    UAW, Volkswagen reach tentative deal at Tennessee plant 
    Image for Sony lifts profit target after strong quarter, but PlayStation 5 sales slide
    Sony lifts profit target after strong quarter, but PlayStation 5 sales slide
    Image for Qualcomm, Arm bear brunt of memory shortage as smartphone chip sales disappoint
    Qualcomm, Arm bear brunt of memory shortage as smartphone chip sales disappoint
    Image for Instagram recovers after brief outage disrupts US users
    Instagram recovers after brief outage disrupts US users
    Image for Asia shares slump as global tech selloff spooks investors, silver tumbles again
    Asia shares slump as global tech selloff spooks investors, silver tumbles again
    Image for Dollar recovers as central bank decisions loom
    Dollar recovers as central bank decisions loom
    Image for Oil falls 2% on easing supply concern after US, Iran agree to talks
    Oil falls 2% on easing supply concern after US, Iran agree to talks
    View All Finance Posts
    Previous Finance PostThe Science of Wire Transfers: Understanding the Bank-to-Bank Wire Transmission
    Next Finance PostSIMPLER STEPS FOR SMALL BUSINESSES OPENING A BUSINESS CURRENT ACCOUNT