Connect with us


Global corporate tax overhaul faces rocky road to completion

Global corporate tax overhaul faces rocky road to completion 1

By Leigh Thomas and Andrea Shalal

PARIS (Reuters) – A long road strewn with potential political pitfalls lies ahead for countries seeking to end a race to the bottom on international corporate tax, even though 130 of them have agreed to overhaul the way multinationals are taxed.

Nearly all 139 countries involved in talks at the Paris-based Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) last week backed plans for new rules on where companies’ profits are taxed, and a rate of at least 15%.

With ink barely dry on the agreement, jubilant politicians in higher-tax countries declared that what French Finance Minister Bruno Le Maire termed the “most important international tax deal in a century” had ended tax competition among governments.

G20 finance ministers are expected to endorse the deal at meetings on Friday and Saturday in Venice, adding momentum to a global initiative that in June prompted G7 ministers to back a clampdown on tax havens including the British Virgin Islands.

The new rules emerging from the OECD pact are tentatively scheduled to take effect in 2023, but for that to happen, countries must hammer out remaining details by October so tax codes can be revised next year – and some signatories, including India and Switzerland, have since expressed reservations.

That suggests a 2023 implementation could be optimistic, given that many countries took years to ratify an earlier less far-reaching amendment to international tax treaties.

In the European Union, the world’s biggest trading bloc in terms of consumer wealth, the best vehicle for enforcing the rules would be an EU law. That could come during France’s six-month presidency stint in the first half of 2022.

However, like all tax decisions in the EU, that would require unanimous backing from member states, and none of low-tax Estonia, Hungary and Ireland supported the OECD agreement.

“There will be pressure on the remaining three countries to change their position,” a source close to the tax talks said.

Another source said that while the Irish and Estonians could probably be swayed, the Hungarians would likely be harder. Cyprus, which was not involved in the OECD talks but is an EU member, will also have to be convinced.

For Peter Vale, international tax partner in the Dublin office of accountants Grant Thornton, there is ultimately little that countries like Ireland can do to keep the deal from going ahead.

“The hope would be that Ireland and other countries, including some who have signed up to it, can exert some influence and impact on that rate so maybe it is capped at 15%. That’s something that Ireland can probably live with,” he added.


But other potential complications exist.

The European Commission aims to present plans this month for a levy on digital services, needed to finance the bloc’s 750 billion euro ($890 billion) post-pandemic recovery fund but which risks falling foul of Washington.

As part of the broader deal, the U.S. administration wants countries to repeal existing national digital services taxes, which it considers unfairly target Silicon Valley firms.

Brussels has insisted the new charge is a broad-based levy, not a tax, that would mostly cover European companies.

Meanwhile, the U.S. administration has its hands full working to enact President Joe Biden’s proposed tax increases – including a 15% minimum corporate tax rate – at home.

Top White House economic adviser Brian Deese said the fact 130 countries had signed on should defuse Republican arguments that raising corporate taxes could harm the United States if low-tax jurisdictions did not follow suit.

The Biden administration appears likely to enact its tax plans using a Democrats-only legislative measure. But it is unclear if Washington would need to change any bilateral tax treaties, which would require a two-thirds majority in the Senate.

($1 = 0.8424 euros)

(Additional reporting by Mark John; editing by Mark John and John Stonestreet)

Editorial & Advertiser disclosure
Our website provides you with information, news, press releases, Opinion and advertorials on various financial products and services. This is not to be considered as financial advice and should be considered only for information purposes. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any information provided with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek Professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. We link to various third party websites, affiliate sales networks, and may link to our advertising partners websites. Though we are tied up with various advertising and affiliate networks, this does not affect our analysis or opinion. When you view or click on certain links available on our articles, our partners may compensate us for displaying the content to you, or make a purchase or fill a form. This will not incur any additional charges to you. To make things simpler for you to identity or distinguish sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles or links hosted on our site as a partner endorsed link.
Global Banking and Finance Review Awards Nominations 2021
2021 Awards now open. Click Here to Nominate


Newsletters with Secrets & Analysis. Subscribe Now