Editorial & Advertiser Disclosure Global Banking And Finance Review is an independent publisher which offers News, information, Analysis, Opinion, Press Releases, Reviews, Research reports covering various economies, industries, products, services and companies. The content available on globalbankingandfinance.com is sourced by a mixture of different methods which is not limited to content produced and supplied by various staff writers, journalists, freelancers, individuals, organizations, companies, PR agencies Sponsored Posts etc. The information available on this website is purely for educational and informational purposes only. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any of the information provided at globalbankingandfinance.com with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. Globalbankingandfinance.com also links to various third party websites and we cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of the information provided by third party websites. Links from various articles on our site to third party websites are a mixture of non-sponsored links and sponsored links. Only a very small fraction of the links which point to external websites are affiliate links. Some of the links which you may click on our website may link to various products and services from our partners who may compensate us if you buy a service or product or fill a form or install an app. This will not incur additional cost to you. A very few articles on our website are sponsored posts or paid advertorials. These are marked as sponsored posts at the bottom of each post. For avoidance of any doubts and to make it easier for you to differentiate sponsored or non-sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles on our site or all links to external websites as sponsored . Please note that some of the services or products which we talk about carry a high level of risk and may not be suitable for everyone. These may be complex services or products and we request the readers to consider this purely from an educational standpoint. The information provided on this website is general in nature. Global Banking & Finance Review expressly disclaims any liability without any limitation which may arise directly or indirectly from the use of such information.

For almost one in five consumers, social ratings come at a cost

Kaspersky’s latest reportSocial credits and security: embracing the world of ratings, has uncovered that 18% of consumers globally have experienced issues accessing financial services because of an assessment of their social media information by scoring systems. While such social scoring systems have become more widespread and are already implemented in many countries and industry sectors, their creation requires more attention, as they may lead to negative consequences.

Nearly all of the services we use online for almost every aspect of our life – from social networks to bank accounts – are data-driven to make people’s lives easier. With personal information, including social media activity, organisations can offer their current and potential customers customised services and provide a more seamless experience. However, such behavioral assessment also leads to social credit scorings based on automated algorithms that may impact our personal lives. Consumers have shared examples of such experiences within the Kaspersky’s report “Social credits and security: embracing the world of ratings”.

According to the findings18% of consumers have experienced issues in getting loans or mortgages because of information collected about them from their social media account, with 25-34 year-olds (32%) that most rely on these services, being the most affected. While there are existing and well known regulations for credit scoring based on financial behavior, there is no framework people are publicly aware of when it comes to the systems that collect personal information from our online profiles.

Kaspersky’s report suggest that people are ready to share sensitive private data to secure better rates and discounts, and to receive special services. At the same time, a significant number of consumers remain vigilant with how they use social media, and some may not consider letting organisations peek into their personal lives. For instance, a quarter (26%) of respondents said they would not share their profile just so they could fast track through credit card background checks. A slightly lower percentage group is not comfortable with sharing this kind of personal information in order to secure a place in a top school for a child (20%) or a better flat for rent (18%).

“In today’s digital world a social scoring system will soon grow more widespread, becoming not just a choice but an integral part of multiple services. However, the Kaspersky global survey highlights that there is a significant number of those who don’t want to share their private information in order to secure any deals. Their opinion cannot be ignored, and as developers create  AI algorithms into social ratings, the interests of all should be considered, as well as questions of trust and transparency should be addressed.” comments Marco Preuss, Director of Kaspersky’s Global Research and Analysis Team in Europe.

While businesses try to benefit from technology and consumer data in new ways, consumers are also considering which organisations can be trusted with their data – as the cyberthreat landscape continues to widen and protecting personal data can be a big challenge. Kaspersky has found that consumers are relying more on medical operators, banks or insurance companies in questions of their data, rather than governments. Thus, only 19% of respondents said they do not trust these companies or services to store their personal data, while a quarter (24%) of consumers say they do not trust the government.

Professor Chengyi Lin, Affiliate Professor of Strategy at INSEAD, comments: “The main objective of a social scoring system is to measure and improve trust – in both the digital and physical worlds. At the same time, the system will require trust from the public to function. Depending on the economic, social and cultural context, the level of overall trust, trust in various entities and trust in the digital world vary country by country. Therefore, the decision on whether to design and implement a social scoring system, at least in the short term, is likely to reside with each country. Beyond the obvious concerns on data privacy and security, the decision needs to carefully consider what trade-offs that society is willing to make, who the society is willing to entrust to design and operate the system, and how the system will be implemented and governed.”

While sharing personal information online Kaspersky advises consumers to take the following steps to protect their privacy:

  • Be conscious of what personal information you share online and who has an access to your personal accounts. You can use Kaspersky’s Privacy Check service to explore how to change the privacy settings for your online services to take control of your personal data.
  • Sharing behavior has its benefits but only with the the right services. An online survey may give you a discount off your favorite brand, but this may lead to a company learning more than you wanted them to know. Remain vigilant about your online activities.
  • Use a reliable security solution for comprehensive protection from a wide range of threats, such as Kaspersky Security Cloud to protect online privacy. For instance, the Do Not Track feature prevents the loading of tracking elements that monitor your actions on websites and collect information about you.