Editorial & Advertiser Disclosure Global Banking And Finance Review is an independent publisher which offers News, information, Analysis, Opinion, Press Releases, Reviews, Research reports covering various economies, industries, products, services and companies. The content available on globalbankingandfinance.com is sourced by a mixture of different methods which is not limited to content produced and supplied by various staff writers, journalists, freelancers, individuals, organizations, companies, PR agencies Sponsored Posts etc. The information available on this website is purely for educational and informational purposes only. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any of the information provided at globalbankingandfinance.com with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. Globalbankingandfinance.com also links to various third party websites and we cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of the information provided by third party websites. Links from various articles on our site to third party websites are a mixture of non-sponsored links and sponsored links. Only a very small fraction of the links which point to external websites are affiliate links. Some of the links which you may click on our website may link to various products and services from our partners who may compensate us if you buy a service or product or fill a form or install an app. This will not incur additional cost to you. A very few articles on our website are sponsored posts or paid advertorials. These are marked as sponsored posts at the bottom of each post. For avoidance of any doubts and to make it easier for you to differentiate sponsored or non-sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles on our site or all links to external websites as sponsored . Please note that some of the services or products which we talk about carry a high level of risk and may not be suitable for everyone. These may be complex services or products and we request the readers to consider this purely from an educational standpoint. The information provided on this website is general in nature. Global Banking & Finance Review expressly disclaims any liability without any limitation which may arise directly or indirectly from the use of such information.

Corporate loan recovery rates much higher than assumed, confirms second Global Credit Data report on LGD

For the second year running, Global Credit Data releases extensive analytics on loss given default, confirming the positive results from 2018

Global Credit Data (GCD), a not-for-profit data-collection initiative jointly owned by more than 50 leading global banks, has today released its second authoritative report on loss given default (LGD) for large corporate borrowers with a turnover above €50m. The LGD Report 2019 reveals that long-term recovery rates for large corporates are significantly higher than industry estimates. According to the data, banks recover, on average, 76% of debts owed by large corporate borrowers after default. This is significantly higher than the 55% recovery rate implemented by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision for corporate exposure under the foundation IRB approach.

The findings are based on a reference data set comprising 10,737 defaulted borrowers and 18,465 facilities, from 58 lenders worldwide.

“With three new lenders, over 1,000 more borrowers with more than 1,500 loans and an additional year’s worth of defaults, these results are based on a larger and richer data set than last year’s industry-standard report,” says Nunzia Rainone, Methodology and Membership Executive, Global Credit Data. “The fact that the findings are in line with the previous report confirms the stability and consistency of our data sets and the reliability of our long-term estimates.”

Results also reveal that seniority and collateral remain important tools for minimising LGD. Indeed, LGD outcome is usually lower for collateralised defaults, supporting common bank lending policies that assume that the taking of collateral will improve their position.

The data indicates that secured LGDs are generally lower than unsecured (22% vs. 27% on obligor level; 22% vs. 25% on obligation level). Meanwhile, for unsecured LGD, seniority is confirmed as a driver at obligor level (26% senior vs. 38% subordinated) and obligation level (24% senior vs. 36% subordinated).

The time banks take to recover defaulted debt is also quicker than might be expected. While time to resolution is two years on average, the average time to recovery (TTRec) – the average period between default and cash flow payment weighted by the amount of the payment – is only 1.2 years. As a more objective measure of the time in default, only dependent on the time to cash flow, TTRec represents a useful tool for understanding discount rates on LGD. Outcomes for TTRec are also remarkably similar across differing collateral and seniority states.

“Insights gathered from the LGD Report 2019 continue to confirm the benefit of detailed and granular collection of post-default cash-flow data,” adds Richard Crecel, Executive

Director at Global Credit Data. “The consistency of our data sets – compiled from our members’ own high-quality data – allows for objective analysis of LGD drivers. As a non- profit organisation, we insist on this high quality of data from our members – which drives detailed high-quality outputs and well-informed decisions.”

GCD also provides its members with the detailed data sets and extensive peer comparison reports, allowing them to test and confirm results with customised sub-sets of data. This gives banks the opportunity to benchmark their own results against those of their peers and carry out detailed analyses of often complex considerations such as the impact of collateral.

Click here to download the full report.

Click here to download the Appendix: Database & Methodology.