Search
00
GBAF Logo
trophy
Top StoriesInterviewsBusinessFinanceBankingTechnologyInvestingTradingVideosAwardsMagazinesHeadlinesTrends

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest news and updates from our team.

Global Banking & Finance Review®

Global Banking & Finance Review® - Subscribe to our newsletter

Company

    GBAF Logo
    • About Us
    • Advertising and Sponsorship
    • Profile & Readership
    • Contact Us
    • Latest News
    • Privacy & Cookies Policies
    • Terms of Use
    • Advertising Terms
    • Issue 81
    • Issue 80
    • Issue 79
    • Issue 78
    • Issue 77
    • Issue 76
    • Issue 75
    • Issue 74
    • Issue 73
    • Issue 72
    • Issue 71
    • Issue 70
    • View All
    • About the Awards
    • Awards Timetable
    • Awards Winners
    • Submit Nominations
    • Testimonials
    • Media Room
    • FAQ
    • Asset Management Awards
    • Brand of the Year Awards
    • Business Awards
    • Cash Management Banking Awards
    • Banking Technology Awards
    • CEO Awards
    • Customer Service Awards
    • CSR Awards
    • Deal of the Year Awards
    • Corporate Governance Awards
    • Corporate Banking Awards
    • Digital Transformation Awards
    • Fintech Awards
    • Education & Training Awards
    • ESG & Sustainability Awards
    • ESG Awards
    • Forex Banking Awards
    • Innovation Awards
    • Insurance & Takaful Awards
    • Investment Banking Awards
    • Investor Relations Awards
    • Leadership Awards
    • Islamic Banking Awards
    • Real Estate Awards
    • Project Finance Awards
    • Process & Product Awards
    • Telecommunication Awards
    • HR & Recruitment Awards
    • Trade Finance Awards
    • The Next 100 Global Awards
    • Wealth Management Awards
    • Travel Awards
    • Years of Excellence Awards
    • Publishing Principles
    • Ownership & Funding
    • Corrections Policy
    • Editorial Code of Ethics
    • Diversity & Inclusion Policy
    • Fact Checking Policy
    Original content: Global Banking and Finance Review - https://www.globalbankingandfinance.com

    A global financial intelligence and recognition platform delivering authoritative insights, data-driven analysis, and institutional benchmarking across Banking, Capital Markets, Investment, Technology, and Financial Infrastructure.

    Copyright © 2010-2026 - All Rights Reserved. | Sitemap | Tags

    Editorial & Advertiser disclosure

    Global Banking & Finance Review® is an online platform offering news, analysis, and opinion on the latest trends, developments, and innovations in the banking and finance industry worldwide. The platform covers a diverse range of topics, including banking, insurance, investment, wealth management, fintech, and regulatory issues. The website publishes news, press releases, opinion and advertorials on various financial organizations, products and services which are commissioned from various Companies, Organizations, PR agencies, Bloggers etc. These commissioned articles are commercial in nature. This is not to be considered as financial advice and should be considered only for information purposes. It does not reflect the views or opinion of our website and is not to be considered an endorsement or a recommendation. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any information provided with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek Professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. We link to various third-party websites, affiliate sales networks, and to our advertising partners websites. When you view or click on certain links available on our articles, our partners may compensate us for displaying the content to you or make a purchase or fill a form. This will not incur any additional charges to you. To make things simpler for you to identity or distinguish advertised or sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles or links hosted on our site as a commercial article placement. We will not be responsible for any loss you may suffer as a result of any omission or inaccuracy on the website.

    1. Home
    2. >Business
    3. >CONSUMERS NOT HAPPY WITH ADDITIONAL ONLINE SECURITY MEASURES COMMONLY USED BY THE FINANCIAL SECTOR
    Why waste money on news and opinion when you can access them for free?

    Take advantage of our newsletter subscription and stay informed on the go!

    Subscribe

    Business

    Consumers Not Happy With Additional Online Security Measures Commonly Used by the Financial Sector

    Published by Gbaf News

    Posted on December 13, 2013

    6 min read

    Last updated: January 22, 2026

    Add as preferred source on Google
    The image illustrates the UK's FTSE 100 index performance amid the controversy over G7 loans to Ukraine backed by frozen Russian assets. This reflects the ongoing financial tension and geopolitical implications discussed in the article.
    UK's FTSE 100 and financial markets react to Russia's embassy statement on G7 loans to Ukraine - Global Banking & Finance Review

    One in four users have had an online service hacked but remain unhappy about additional security methods

    Consumers not happy with additional online security measures

    Consumers not happy with additional online security measures

    Almost a quarter (24 per cent) of UK consumers have had their account hacked or data stolen for an online service, with five per cent having been compromised more than once, according to new research commissioned by CertiVox, a leading provider of authentication and encryption software and services. When asked about the services for which accounts had been hacked, the majority of incidents involved email or social media accounts, but it was found that 13 per cent of the incidents involved banking or credit card accounts.

    Despite the number of consumers who have had data compromised, users do not believe that security should be implemented at the cost of user experience. When asked about specific security procedures that are common when using online financial services:

    • 39 per cent said that needing to have a token generator (key-fob with separate password number) was either a hassle or a lot of hassle
    • 40 per cent felt the same about having to answer additional security questions such as ‘first pet’s name’
    • 53 per cent were not happy about having to verify security details over the phone before accessing accounts
    • 46 per cent of respondents identified waiting for a password to be sent via text message as a hassle or a lot of hassle

    Despite these findings the importance of security is acknowledged by users, with 43 per cent of respondents saying that their general attitude towards additional layers of security was that they could be a pain at times, but are needed.  Perhaps unsurprisingly, given the number of people who have had accounts or data compromised, the research also found that only 60 per cent of respondents trust the username and password authentication process as a secure way to access online services. 26 per cent don’t trust the process and a further 14 per cent are unsure.

    The research, conducted by Populus among a representative sample of 2,012 UK respondents, also looked at the actions consumers would take following a data breach, and found that a huge 25 per cent of respondents said that they would terminate a service immediately if their account was compromised or data stolen. This is an alarming figure for financial services organisations coping with a growing number of security threats while trying to retain customers in an increasingly competitive market.

    Commenting on the findings, Brian Spector, CEO of CertiVox said, “This research shows that many consumers are coming round to the thinking of the security industry: that the username and password authentication system is not secure enough to protect their data. However the same users are not overly happy about the user experience offered by additional security measures implemented by financial services organisations.

    “It is also clear from the research that organisations which do not secure their users’ data adequately are likely to start seeing users move away. This should act as a prompt to organisations everywhere to consider their security more carefully than ever before while realising that it should not be at the cost of the user experience.”

    Methodology
    The research surveyed a UK representative sample of 2012 adults (18+) on their views on online security in December 2013. Specifically consumers were asked about their views on the username and password system, additional security measures, and their own experience of online security breaches.

    One in four users have had an online service hacked but remain unhappy about additional security methods

    Consumers not happy with additional online security measures

    Consumers not happy with additional online security measures

    Almost a quarter (24 per cent) of UK consumers have had their account hacked or data stolen for an online service, with five per cent having been compromised more than once, according to new research commissioned by CertiVox, a leading provider of authentication and encryption software and services. When asked about the services for which accounts had been hacked, the majority of incidents involved email or social media accounts, but it was found that 13 per cent of the incidents involved banking or credit card accounts.

    Despite the number of consumers who have had data compromised, users do not believe that security should be implemented at the cost of user experience. When asked about specific security procedures that are common when using online financial services:

    • 39 per cent said that needing to have a token generator (key-fob with separate password number) was either a hassle or a lot of hassle
    • 40 per cent felt the same about having to answer additional security questions such as ‘first pet’s name’
    • 53 per cent were not happy about having to verify security details over the phone before accessing accounts
    • 46 per cent of respondents identified waiting for a password to be sent via text message as a hassle or a lot of hassle

    Despite these findings the importance of security is acknowledged by users, with 43 per cent of respondents saying that their general attitude towards additional layers of security was that they could be a pain at times, but are needed.  Perhaps unsurprisingly, given the number of people who have had accounts or data compromised, the research also found that only 60 per cent of respondents trust the username and password authentication process as a secure way to access online services. 26 per cent don’t trust the process and a further 14 per cent are unsure.

    The research, conducted by Populus among a representative sample of 2,012 UK respondents, also looked at the actions consumers would take following a data breach, and found that a huge 25 per cent of respondents said that they would terminate a service immediately if their account was compromised or data stolen. This is an alarming figure for financial services organisations coping with a growing number of security threats while trying to retain customers in an increasingly competitive market.

    Commenting on the findings, Brian Spector, CEO of CertiVox said, “This research shows that many consumers are coming round to the thinking of the security industry: that the username and password authentication system is not secure enough to protect their data. However the same users are not overly happy about the user experience offered by additional security measures implemented by financial services organisations.

    “It is also clear from the research that organisations which do not secure their users’ data adequately are likely to start seeing users move away. This should act as a prompt to organisations everywhere to consider their security more carefully than ever before while realising that it should not be at the cost of the user experience.”

    Methodology
    The research surveyed a UK representative sample of 2012 adults (18+) on their views on online security in December 2013. Specifically consumers were asked about their views on the username and password system, additional security measures, and their own experience of online security breaches.

    More from Business

    Explore more articles in the Business category

    Image for Submit Your Entry for Years of Excellence Awards 2026
    Submit Your Entry for Years of Excellence Awards 2026
    Image for Nominations Open for Travel & Hospitality Awards 2026
    Nominations Open for Travel & Hospitality Awards 2026
    Image for Submit Your Entry Today for Telecom Awards 2026
    Submit Your Entry Today for Telecom Awards 2026
    Image for Submit Your Entries for The Next 100 Global Awards 2026
    Submit Your Entries for the Next 100 Global Awards 2026
    Image for Submit Your Entry: Public Sector & Governance Excellence Awards 2026
    Submit Your Entry: Public Sector & Governance Excellence Awards 2026
    Image for Nominations Invited for Real Estate Development Awards 2026
    Nominations Invited for Real Estate Development Awards 2026
    Image for Submit Your Entry: Process & Product Awards 2026
    Submit Your Entry: Process & Product Awards 2026
    Image for Call for Entries: HR & Recruitment Awards 2026
    Call for Entries: HR & Recruitment Awards 2026
    Image for Submit Your Nominations Today for Education & Training Awards 2026
    Submit Your Nominations Today for Education & Training Awards 2026
    Image for Join the Corporate Governance Awards 2026: Showcase Your Organisation’s Leadership
    Join the Corporate Governance Awards 2026: Showcase Your Organisation’s Leadership
    Image for Submit Your Entry Today for Business Awards 2026
    Submit Your Entry Today for Business Awards 2026
    Image for Decentralized Masters’ ‘family culture’ building trust instead of hierarchy
    Decentralized Masters’ ‘family Culture’ Building Trust Instead of Hierarchy
    View All Business Posts
    Previous Business PostThe Seven Key Challenges of Conduct Risk Management
    Next Business PostSeven Best Practices for Selling Renewals