Editorial & Advertiser Disclosure Global Banking And Finance Review is an independent publisher which offers News, information, Analysis, Opinion, Press Releases, Reviews, Research reports covering various economies, industries, products, services and companies. The content available on globalbankingandfinance.com is sourced by a mixture of different methods which is not limited to content produced and supplied by various staff writers, journalists, freelancers, individuals, organizations, companies, PR agencies Sponsored Posts etc. The information available on this website is purely for educational and informational purposes only. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any of the information provided at globalbankingandfinance.com with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. Globalbankingandfinance.com also links to various third party websites and we cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of the information provided by third party websites. Links from various articles on our site to third party websites are a mixture of non-sponsored links and sponsored links. Only a very small fraction of the links which point to external websites are affiliate links. Some of the links which you may click on our website may link to various products and services from our partners who may compensate us if you buy a service or product or fill a form or install an app. This will not incur additional cost to you. A very few articles on our website are sponsored posts or paid advertorials. These are marked as sponsored posts at the bottom of each post. For avoidance of any doubts and to make it easier for you to differentiate sponsored or non-sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles on our site or all links to external websites as sponsored . Please note that some of the services or products which we talk about carry a high level of risk and may not be suitable for everyone. These may be complex services or products and we request the readers to consider this purely from an educational standpoint. The information provided on this website is general in nature. Global Banking & Finance Review expressly disclaims any liability without any limitation which may arise directly or indirectly from the use of such information.

Aircraft financing: LTVs require closer attention to potentially volatile depreciation rates

Aircraft financing is a less straightforward investment proposition than it is sometimes made to appear, says Scope Ratings. Realistic loan-to-value calculations are a moving target that need to reflect uneven rates of aircraft depreciation over time.

Scope urges investors to use a sufficiently conservative approach, ideally using an aircraft’s so-called constant half-life base value, and to further stress test this value, when assessing the LTV.

“Generally, it is important that the amortisation of the investment is faster than the depreciating aircraft value,” says Helene Spro, analyst at Scope. Investors need to monitor the LTV over time, and its rate of change, to control risk exposure, rather than focus solely on the initial and final LTV when entering into a transaction. “While the L in the LTV calculation is easy to determine, the V is up for debate,” says Spro.

One issue is whether the LTV should be based on the value of the aircraft traded in a balanced supply-demand market in an arm’s length transaction, its base value, or its current market value, which is harder to forecast for the future. Scope recommends the former.

Another critical issue is where an aircraft is in its maintenance cycle. Investors are often presented with an LTV calculation based on a full-life aircraft value—in other words, a valuation assuming an aircraft has just had a maintenance overhaul—rather than half-life, when an aircraft is between overhauls.

“Investors are unlikely to receive an aircraft back in a full-life condition in a default scenario,” says Spro. The older the aircraft, the larger the difference between its half-life and full-life value, she says.

Stressing an aircraft’s base value is another essential element in deriving a realistic LTV, whether it is for extreme financial-market conditions, or how an aircraft fits into a manufacturer’s product cycle. Scope’s analysis of three different Boeing 737s delivered in 2000 show that newer -700 and -800 models recovered some of their value after a drop following the 2001 crisis unlike the older -600 aircraft, but none retained much if any value after the 2008 financial crisis.

In most transactions, stressed constant half-life base values will produce periods of losses in the event of a default.

“This doesn’t mean the investment shouldn’t be undertaken, just that investors need to look at worse-case scenarios and unlikely events to properly understand the true potential downside of a transaction and ensure the risk is priced appropriately,” says Spro.

Download the report here.