Concorde Solutions warns organisations to beware the cloud when it comes to licensing, and always negotiate
Support for Windows XP finally came to a halt last month and many companies still using the operating system faced an inevitable realisation when upgrading: prices for IT assets have risen, a lot. Microsoft warned last year that 2014 and 2015 will see significant price rises, but while this can be a worry, there are some very simple ways to start to win the battle against it, suggests Martin Prendergast, CEO of Concorde Solutions.
Cloud computing, hosted software, services and infrastructure, as well as mobile working have also exacerbated the potential problems caused by these often complicated pricing structures. Prendergast said: “Microsoft itself is one step ahead of the curve, and replaced its three-year-old software licensing pricing structure with Server and Cloud Enrolment this January, encompassing the Windows Server and System Center. It’s my firm belief that other major and independent software providers will follow suit, and for many businesses it’s a complex issue that has to be monitored on an almost daily basis, because the cloud is so fluid in nature. It’s too easy to get caught out with either huge fines or large unnecessary over-payment on software that you don’t use.”
He expanded: “Price increases are never going to be an easy or popular thing to communicate; SAP experienced this back in 2008, when it declared it would move all its customers to its Enterprise Support package – a far costlier option. Its customers reacted angrily and various global SAP user groups complained long and loud, resulting in SAP relenting and allowing Standard and Premium support packages to remain.
“Sadly, not many businesses know how and why they should negotiate with vendors. Now is of course a good time to do so, as the end of the fiscal year rapidly approaches and IT budgets will be under pinpoint scrutiny. So trying to find cost-savings is more important than ever,’ Prendergast added.
He said: “Though negotiation appears daunting at first, there are some easy and perhaps even common sense steps that you can take to ensure you’re paying for the right amount of software licences that your business actually uses. Here follows my top tips,”
1. Know the exact size and make-up of your software estate. You can start your negotiations from a position of confidence if you’re making good use of your business intelligence
2. Understand what’s happening with mobile devices in your business. This can have a huge impact on your licensing position and can expose you to compliance risk, because BYOD is still a fledgling practice
3. Check the small print on your vendor contracts. Remember, software maintenance clauses are not compulsory or always necessary; they make a lot of money for vendors and you may easily be able to live without them
4. Don’t accept assumptions from vendors about your usage. You may be using less, not more, and automatic ‘true-up’ clauses in contracts may be bleeding your budget
5. If you’re making changes to your software estate, make use of scenario modelling. Get a clear picture of the impact of licensing, and communicate this to your vendor; you may need to spend less than you think
Five ways to mitigate the risk of AI models
By Dave Trier, VP of Product at ModelOp
In recent years, the banking industry has been at the forefront of AI and ML adoption. A recent survey by Deloitte Insights
shows 70% of all financial services firms use machine learning to manage cash flow, determine credit scores, and protect against cybercrime. According to an Economist Intelligence Unit adoption study, 54% of banks and financial institutions with more than 5,000 employees have adopted AI.
But AI and ML adoption has not been easy. Difficulty in deployment has been exacerbated by the growing number of new AI platforms, languages, frameworks, and hybrid compute infrastructure. Add to this the fact that models are being developed by staff in multiple business units and AI teams, making it difficult to ensure that the proper risk and regulatory controls and processes are enforced.
As these AI initiatives and models multiply, risk managers and compliance officers are challenged to ensure proper governance measures are in place, and more importantly, adhered to. Without an auditable process, model risk management steps are often overlooked by those responsible for developing, monitoring, and governing models. If left unattended, steps are skipped leaving companies exposed to unacceptable business risk such as fines, unreliable model outcomes and, depending on model use, fraud.
Yet enforcing governance and risk requirements is a constant challenge, and one that is a delicate balancing act between enforcing risks while continuing to encourage innovation. As AI and ML adoption grows and regulatory guidance changes, monitoring and governance becomes more complex.
Here are five best practices that banks and financial institutions should consider following to ensure that AI and ML models are governed and monitored effectively.
- Define an end-to-end model operations process
An end-to-end model operations process, referred to as a model life cycle (MLC) is a detailed workflow with well-defined steps for operationalizing and maintaining the model throughout its production life, from deployment to retirement. This includes steps for running and monitoring the model to ensure it continuously produces reliable results, as well as the steps a company has identified for controlling risk and adhering to regulatory and compliance requirements.
A model life cycle typically includes workflows for model registration, business approvals, risk controls enforcement, and model retraining, re-testing, re-validation, and eventually retirement. It ensures that the appropriate controls are put in place early in the operationalization process and should include thresholds that are identified and agreed upon with the 2nd line teams.
These workflows should integrate with existing applications, like data platforms, model development applications, IT service management systems, MRM systems, etc. instead of duplicating or replicating efforts. This will ensure that the latest information is being used in the model operations process and eliminate redundancy that often leads to inconsistencies.
The model life cycle establishes the technical and organizational scaffolding that unites data scientists, data engineers, developers, IT operations, model operations, risk managers and business unit leaders through clearly defined processes and ensures that all models are following the proper risk and governance procedures.
- Register all models in a central production model inventory
The first step in operationalizing a model is registering the model(s) and associated artifacts in a centralized production model inventory. All the elements that compose the model—such as source code, tests, input and output schemas, training data, metadata, as well as outputs of training—should be included, along with all the elements required to execute it, including libraries.
With a growing number of different business processes and applications that use models and platforms that run models, it is increasingly challenging for IT and business executives to confidently have a pulse on what models are actually being used for business decisioning and where they are being used.
A centralized production model inventory provides visibility into all models running in production, regardless of where they’re executing, the business process or application they’re serving, or the AI/ML language or framework used for development. This provides the flexibility to leverage existing investments, while still providing the proper level of controls for these critical business decisioning assets.
- Automate model monitoring and orchestrate remediation
Monitoring begins when a model is first implemented in production systems for actual business use and continues until the model is retired. While most of the buzz in the AI world focuses on data drift and model accuracy, model risk teams need more comprehensive monitoring focused on population stability, characteristic stability, rank order break, score concentration, selection curves, model expiration dates, ethical fairness, and many others. AI models require more frequent monitoring based on shifts in data, ongoing enforcement of business and risk thresholds and other factors.
Detecting a problem is just the first step. To achieve optimal performance and reliability, remediation must be part of the monitoring process. Monitoring workflows need to include gathering problem information, obtaining performance metrics, generating reports for aiding in diagnosis, initiating and routing incident and change requests, taking corrective actions, gating activities that need approvals and tracking the entire process until model health and performance is reinstated.
For monitoring to be most effective, it should include alerts and notification of potential upcoming issues, and most importantly, it should be automated. With the speed at which AI and ML models are being developed and embedded into core business processes, monitoring models has grown beyond human scale in most companies.
- Establish regulatory and compliance controls for all models
Models are a form of intellectual capital that should be governed as a corporate asset. They should be inventoried and assessed using tools and techniques that make auditing and reporting as efficient as possible.
The “black box” characteristics of AI and ML algorithms limit insight into the predictive factors, which is incompatible with model governance requirements that demand interpretability and explainability.
Many companies are attempting to extend their model risk processes for 1st and 2nd line teams, which is a great start, but consistent processes and automation are also required. While the entire governance process may not be able to be automated, it can be automatically orchestrated to ensure that all regulatory and business controls are enforced for all models and all steps are tracked, reproduceable and auditable.
Compliance and auditability require a systematic reproduction of training, evaluation and scoring of each model version and ultimately the transparency and auditability typically required for regulatory and business compliance.
- Orchestrate, don’t duplicate or replicate.
Automating and orchestrating all aspects of model operations ensures model reliability and governance at scale. Each model in the enterprise can take a wide variety of paths to production, have different patterns for monitoring and various requirements for continuous improvement or retirement.
A well-designed model operations process leverages, not duplicates, the capabilities of the business and IT systems involved in developing models and maintaining model health and reliability. This includes integrating with model development platforms, change management systems, source code management systems, data management systems, infrastructure management systems and model risk management systems. This integration provides the connection points for orchestrating actions, streamlining the model operations processes and allowing for end-to-end management of the complete model lineage that is traceable and auditable.
Making it all work
Technology is an important component for establishing good model operations and providing the responsiveness, auditability, and scalability that is needed, but it is not a magic bullet. Successful model governance requires significant collaboration between first line managers, risk managers, program managers, data scientists in the business lines, and the finance function for all the regulatory and capital reserve models as well as risk in technology.
AI governance and risk management will continue to evolve as AI models and technology change. Regardless, the model operations process must be properly defined, monitored and governed to produce the right business outcomes, which requires a combination of technology, well defined processes and a cross-team collaboration.
Dave Trier, VP of Product at ModelOp and their ModelOp Center product. Dave has over 15 years of experience helping enterprises implement transformational business strategies using innovative technologies—from AI, big data, cloud, to IoT solutions. Currently, Dave serves as the VP Product for ModelOp, charged with defining and executing the product and solutions portfolio to help companies overcome their ModelOps challenges and realize their AI transformation.
This is a Sponsored Feature.
How banks can overcome the IT skills gap in a post-pandemic world
By Zak Virdi, UK Managing Director at SoftwareONE
Banks have always struggled to keep pace with the speed of digital, but the problem has become more pressing in recent years. From a skills perspective, job vacancies for tech roles in UK banking rose to 30%, and the finance industry has called for the creation of a new UK body to boost recruitment in the sector. In a bid to keep up with fierce competition from mobile and online banks and fintechs, established banks are now looking to accelerate digitalisation projects. This is urgent, because COVID-19 has forced a decisive shift to digital. Indeed, since the outbreak of the pandemic, the number of European bank branches has rapidly declined.
However, if banks are to digitalise successfully, and enable a faster pace of innovation, they will need the skills to match. This is no easy feat, as talented people well versed in cloud-native technologies, app modernisation and the legacy tech that many banks continue to operate, are hard to find. This is compounded by the fact that banks also face the reality of a crowd of developers reaching retirement age and taking their skills with them.
Changing skills needs to keep up with fintech
Traditional banks face constant pressure from both industry peers and competitors like fintechs and challenger banks, to provide slicker and more seamless banking experiences. Customers expect new, engaging services and functionality, from contactless payments to digital wallets and banking with wearable devices. While it may be easier for digital-native challengers to continually roll-out new technology, it is a huge challenge for traditional banks to keep up with without digital transformation. However, this is not a simple process.
Let’s take cloud as an example. Migrating to the cloud is seen as a key pillar of any digitalisation project, yet the challenge of building, maintaining and monitoring a complex cloud infrastructure is often beyond the capabilities of existing banking staff. According to Gartner, a majority (80 percent) of today’s workers feel they don’t have the skills required for their current role and future career. To maintain a modern, complex cloud ecosystem banks need more skilled personnel. But adding to the issue is that 53 percent of business leaders struggle to find candidates with the right abilities. The good news is that there are options for banks to address the skills challenge:
- Hiring new talent: Finding someone new with the skills you need is the most obvious solution. This enables banks to pick the specific type of candidate they require, only interviewing those that fit the bill. However, hiring externally is harder when looking for more niche capabilities, and it costs more. Legacy banks also struggle to attract candidates due to the ‘innovative’ and ‘trendy’ reputation of a career at a fintech. When recruiting for roles requiring advanced IT skills – for example, cloud-native orchestration, SAP expertise or DevOps – the pool of potential candidates is small, and banks can end up paying a premium. While hiring new team members to support your existing IT team may be the first option banks consider, it certainly isn’t the only answer.
- Upskilling staff: The World Economic Forum has estimated that 54 percent of workers will need significant digital reskilling by 2022. Looking inward at extra training to advance the skillset of existing staff can be a great way to bridge the gap. The benefits of upskilling include reduced strain on individual employees, less cost and resource drain, and improved collaboration. It will also pay off in the future as established banks build a bank of skills to rival those held by employees at challenger banks. As part of this process, banks will either need an internal skills champion, or an external training partner. Also note that upskilling is gradual and continual; even after training staff, they won’t be experts and will need starter projects to practise what they’ve learned.
- Finding the right partner: Training existing staff and hiring helps futureproof in the long term, but doesn’t solve immediate need. Moreover, some banks may decide they don’t have the capacity or resources to pursue upskilling. So another avenue for banks to consider is finding a partner that can fill a skills gap quickly and with little hassle. Outsourcing IT can save time and resources, and enable projects to move ahead faster. With this approach, banks don’t have to spend hours interviewing potential candidates or training employees each time they embark on a new digital transformation project that requires a specific skill. In addition, banking IT teams can focus on fulfilling their day-to-day roles to the highest standard, without having to tackle unfamiliar or new tasks.
Closing the IT skills gap is only going to become more complicated as banks continue to digitally transform, with the added complication of operating in a highly regulated and competitive sector. A reliable and highly-skilled IT workforce is crucial when pursuing a digital-first future. Whether banks choose to hire-in, upskill or outsource, a clear roadmap needs to be developed that encompasses where skills gaps are and how they can be addressed, to ultimately support financial organisations in their digital transformation efforts.
Unlocking the interconnectivity of Technology and Innovation
By Olly Chubb, Strategy Director, Design by Structure
Technology enables innovation to happen – but it is not why innovation happens.
Thousands of businesses have the capability to ‘innovate’ – to create something new, or something better. What separates successful businesses is not whether they can do something, it’s whether they know why they are doing it. There is a huge distinction here, let’s look at that further.
The most successful businesses deliver more than linear, incremental improvements that make something better, faster or smoother. Instead, they harness a deep understanding of their customers, not just observing how they currently behave, but revealing and understanding their pain points, interrogating what really matters to them and identifying new opportunities to create meaningful change for them.
These businesses can rethink the sector/customer problem, approaching it from a fresh and original perspective, reframing the context and transforming expectations of what ‘better’ means.
As the classic Henry Ford quote goes, “If I’d have asked people what they wanted, they would have said faster horses”. He could have bought the fastest horses, bred them to be even faster and become rich. He didn’t. Why? Because he understood that, although his customers might not have articulated it directly, the problem wasn’t just about speed – so the solution wasn’t just about being faster. Instead, he built a new mode of transport that exceeded expectations and transformed the landscape forever – and he became extremely rich!
In short, technology enables innovation, but the smartest innovations are driven by insight – and so too are the smartest businesses.
It can be easy to forget or overlook this, not least when businesses are running full speed to improve and when there seem to be more options for improvement than ever. The most ground-breaking innovations are not remembered because of the technology, they’re remembered because they transformed businesses, cultures and industries.
We need to think of technology and innovation as having a symbiotic relationship in business. Insight is the catalyst for this change. And by putting it at the heart of every decision and using it to constantly challenge and rationalise why they should do something, businesses can streamline activity, optimise resource and align every action through a clear purpose.
Interconnectivity of tech and innovation
Technology and innovation are interconnected they need each other to thrive, let’s look at some examples.
What’s the biggest frustration people experience with customer services? Feeling that they are not being understood or listened to. Having to go through the same conversation, the same complaint, over and over again because they’re speaking to a different agent. We all know this pain.
Dixa, is a SaaS business currently transforming the customer service experience by making it more personal, intelligent, and data-driven., it puts people at the core of its business and addresses this particular pain point – frustration.
Dixa could have used technology to reduce waiting times or increase accessibility. Instead, they looked at the problem differently and unlocked a fresh way to innovate in this industry. The service combines every customer interaction into one seamless conversation by unifying all contact points – phone, email, chat, and messaging. Therefore, changing the landscape by removing the frustration of having to explain yourself again and again to different customer service agents.
It has used technology to create a seamless, ongoing dialogue that has transformed expectations of customer service forever.
Mews is another business blending insight and technological innovation to revolutionise the hospitality guest experience.
Rather than think about how to improve the traditional property management system that dominated the industry landscape, Mews decided to drive its innovation from a different angle – the human experience of both hoteliers and customers and asked what are their pain points?
By adopting a customer-first perspective, Mews developed customer-first tech that identifies how and where to simplify or automate hotel operations – from booking engine to check-out, front desk ritual to revenue management.
Small scale improvements would not have been enough to compel hoteliers to switch from the established incumbent – but a new way of thinking brought to life through technology, has created wholesale change and encouraged hoteliers and guests to imagine more.
What both these business example show, is where technology was used to deep dive into a real problem, to fulfil a gap in the sector where meaningful change could innovate to the benefit of the end-user – the customer. Both of these solutions tackle specific pain points, and instead of an easy fix, have come up with an idea that can shake a sector and really challenge sedentary thinking.
A final word of caution, too often businesses create or adopt technology for technology’s sake. They realise they can, so they do, but they don’t stop to ask ‘why?’. They should. When you unlock ‘the why’, you unlock the insights.
It is the insight that unlocks innovation – and technology that makes good on the promise.