Editorial & Advertiser Disclosure Global Banking And Finance Review is an independent publisher which offers News, information, Analysis, Opinion, Press Releases, Reviews, Research reports covering various economies, industries, products, services and companies. The content available on globalbankingandfinance.com is sourced by a mixture of different methods which is not limited to content produced and supplied by various staff writers, journalists, freelancers, individuals, organizations, companies, PR agencies Sponsored Posts etc. The information available on this website is purely for educational and informational purposes only. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any of the information provided at globalbankingandfinance.com with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. Globalbankingandfinance.com also links to various third party websites and we cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of the information provided by third party websites. Links from various articles on our site to third party websites are a mixture of non-sponsored links and sponsored links. Only a very small fraction of the links which point to external websites are affiliate links. Some of the links which you may click on our website may link to various products and services from our partners who may compensate us if you buy a service or product or fill a form or install an app. This will not incur additional cost to you. A very few articles on our website are sponsored posts or paid advertorials. These are marked as sponsored posts at the bottom of each post. For avoidance of any doubts and to make it easier for you to differentiate sponsored or non-sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles on our site or all links to external websites as sponsored . Please note that some of the services or products which we talk about carry a high level of risk and may not be suitable for everyone. These may be complex services or products and we request the readers to consider this purely from an educational standpoint. The information provided on this website is general in nature. Global Banking & Finance Review expressly disclaims any liability without any limitation which may arise directly or indirectly from the use of such information.


Commenting on the results of the UK general election, Noland Carter, CIO and Head of Heartwood Investment Management, said

  • “Despite the political headlines, markets are taking the news of a hung parliament reasonably well and there has been no major knee-jerk reaction so far this morning. Sterling fell on the announcement of the exit poll, but the currency has since stabilised as parliamentary results have been confirmed.
  • “We cannot discount the risk of a second General Election, although Theresa May’s Government will try and muddle through, propped up by the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP).
  • “Clearly this is an uncertain political environment, but this election result does not fundamentally change the UK outlook in the shorter term. From the market’s perspective, a worst case scenario outcome has been avoided of a high tax and high spend economic programme, which would create an unfriendly environment for UK-based corporates. While markets are less fearful of this scenario, it remains a very fluid situation.
  • “Brexit is now the primary focus. The key date coming up is the 19th June when negotiations formally begin. It is not yet clear what stance the Government will take. The talks are timetabled to last 15 months. The first six months are expected to focus on settling the issues of citizens’ rights, the UK’s divorce bill (some estimate at around £100 billion) and the border with Ireland. Assuming the EU 27 believes sufficient progress has been made on these issues, the next nine months will be spent on negotiating the future trade deal. Transitional arrangements will be discussed for the period the UK leaves the single market and the customs union in March 2019. Any EU-UK trade deal is expected to be finalised and ratified some years after. All of this has been placed under great uncertainty. Before this election, the UK was on course for a ‘hard but smooth’ Brexit. However, we may now be on course for a ‘hard but rough’ landing.
  • “Under a Conservative government in alliance with the DUP, the fiscal rules set out in the autumn 2016 Budget are unlikely to shift too much and we expect fiscal continuity. The Conservative government had already announced a slower pace of deficit reduction and fiscal austerity in the autumn budget and this is something that the DUP would support, based on its opposition to the Winter Fuel Allowance and Triple Lock pensions commitment. The current aim is to balance the budget by 2025.
  • “The election outcome is unlikely to have much impact on Bank of England policy in the shorter term, which remains accommodative to support overall economic activity. Policymakers are concerned about downside risks to growth as consumers feel the squeeze of falling real incomes. However, the Bank has also expressed its limited tolerance level for above-target inflation and has signalled that policy can move in either direction. That being said, we expect that the recent fall in oil prices and stabilisation in sterling should relieve some inflationary pressures and, therefore, ease the real income squeeze on consumers.
  • “From a longer term economic policy perspective, there has been a notable policy shift across a number of developed economies to find ways to improve productivity growth, which has weakened due to the impacts of ageing demographics and new technologies on the labour force. There are wide ideological differences between the two major UK parties on how these economic challenges are tackled, but after years of austerity and with the rise of populism there is a consensus that more investment is needed in infrastructure, research and development and up-skilling the workforce.
  • “We are taking no immediate actions in portfolios and remain underweight in UK assets. We have an underweight allocation to UK equities, as we believe that other developed markets hold more attractive value. Within the UK equity market, our bias is towards larger companies, which have performed well over the last year and have benefited from the depreciation of sterling. The scale of the imbalances of the UK economy – large current account and budget deficits – keeps us underweight in both sterling and UK government bonds on a duration basis. We also have an underweight position in UK commercial property, where we hold preference for areas of the market that are less sensitive to Brexit risk, such as regional UK cities.
  • “While the focus is on the UK, it is worth remembering that the other 92% of global GDP is largely unaffected by this news. Based on our assessment of global growth drivers and inflation dynamics, not to mention policy tailwinds, we retain a modestly optimistic stance on global risk assets. We continue to think that the fundamental backdrop remains constructive for financial markets and corporate earnings globally.
  • “Events are fluid and we are monitoring political, economic and market developments closely.”