Search
00
GBAF Logo
trophy
Top StoriesInterviewsBusinessFinanceBankingTechnologyInvestingTradingVideosAwardsMagazinesHeadlinesTrends

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest news and updates from our team.

Global Banking and Finance Review

Global Banking & Finance Review

Company

    GBAF Logo
    • About Us
    • Profile
    • Privacy & Cookie Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
    • Advertising
    • Submit Post
    • Latest News
    • Research Reports
    • Press Release
    • Awards▾
      • About the Awards
      • Awards TimeTable
      • Submit Nominations
      • Testimonials
      • Media Room
      • Award Winners
      • FAQ
    • Magazines▾
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 79
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 78
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 77
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 76
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 75
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 73
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 71
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 70
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 69
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 66
    Top StoriesInterviewsBusinessFinanceBankingTechnologyInvestingTradingVideosAwardsMagazinesHeadlinesTrends

    Global Banking & Finance Review® is a leading financial portal and online magazine offering News, Analysis, Opinion, Reviews, Interviews & Videos from the world of Banking, Finance, Business, Trading, Technology, Investing, Brokerage, Foreign Exchange, Tax & Legal, Islamic Finance, Asset & Wealth Management.
    Copyright © 2010-2025 GBAF Publications Ltd - All Rights Reserved.

    ;
    Editorial & Advertiser disclosure

    Global Banking and Finance Review is an online platform offering news, analysis, and opinion on the latest trends, developments, and innovations in the banking and finance industry worldwide. The platform covers a diverse range of topics, including banking, insurance, investment, wealth management, fintech, and regulatory issues. The website publishes news, press releases, opinion and advertorials on various financial organizations, products and services which are commissioned from various Companies, Organizations, PR agencies, Bloggers etc. These commissioned articles are commercial in nature. This is not to be considered as financial advice and should be considered only for information purposes. It does not reflect the views or opinion of our website and is not to be considered an endorsement or a recommendation. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any information provided with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek Professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. We link to various third-party websites, affiliate sales networks, and to our advertising partners websites. When you view or click on certain links available on our articles, our partners may compensate us for displaying the content to you or make a purchase or fill a form. This will not incur any additional charges to you. To make things simpler for you to identity or distinguish advertised or sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles or links hosted on our site as a commercial article placement. We will not be responsible for any loss you may suffer as a result of any omission or inaccuracy on the website.

    Home > Business > The Government consultation on flexible working and what it could mean for employers
    Business

    The Government consultation on flexible working and what it could mean for employers

    The Government consultation on flexible working and what it could mean for employers

    Published by Jessica Weisman-Pitts

    Posted on September 27, 2021

    Featured image for article about Business

    By Sharron Bhandal, senior associate in the employment team at Blaser Mills Law

    The pandemic has led to an increase in flexible working and, as restrictions continue to lift and employees return to the office, employers are anticipating an influx of requests around working remotely and flexibly.

    The Government has responded to this with a planned review later this year to examine a proposed expansion of employees’ rights regarding flexible working and working from home, with a Government spokesperson claiming the consultation will consider making flexible working the default.

    While there is no legal right for employees to work from home, it is important for employers to take this chance to review their current policies around flexible working, and their obligations should an employee make such a request.

    Responding to a statutory request

    Under the Employment Rights Act 1996, requesting flexible working arrangements is a statutory right for employees. An employee has the right to make this request if they have had the same employer for 26 weeks and may only make a statutory request once in any 12-month period.

    The employee must make this request in writing to their employer and should include the date of the application, the nature of the change in working conditions they are seeking, and when this change would come into effect.

    If an employee fails to attend a meeting to discuss their application or appeal and fails to attend a rearranged meeting without a good reason for example, illness, an employer can consider the request as withdrawn and must then inform the employee.

    When an employer receives a request, they must deal with it in a reasonable manner and notify the employee of the outcome, including the result of any appeal, within a 3-month period unless an extended timeframe has been agreed with the employee.

    If an employer chooses to reject a statutory request, they may only do so on one or more of the following statutory grounds:

    • Burden of additional costs on the business
    • Inability to reorganise work amongst existing staff
    • Inability to recruit additional staff
    • Detrimental impact on quality of work
    • Detrimental impact on work performance
    • Detrimental to meeting customer demand
    • Insufficient work for periods employee proposes to work
    • Planned structural changes to the workforce or business

    What constitutes a “reasonable manner”? 

    Requests for flexible working must be dealt with by an employer in a reasonable manner, and failure to do so could mean an employee has the right to complain to an employment tribunal.

    While an employee may not take their case to a tribunal simply because their application was denied, they may do so if their application was incorrectly treated as withdrawn or was rejected based on incorrect data. Dismissal or poor treatment for example, being denied a promotion or pay rise of an employee due to their request can likewise be grounds for a tribunal hearing.

    Employers should always ensure compliance with their own internal flexible working policies, along with the Acas code of practice on handling in a reasonable manner requests to work flexibly.

    Though there is no statutory right for an employee to appeal a decision on their request, offering an appeals process does allow an employer to demonstrate they are handling flexible working requests in a reasonable manner. In these cases, it is important that both the employer and employee follow the company procedure on appeals.

    Proper implementation of flexible working

    Along with a balanced approach to dealing with flexible working requests, it is also important for employers to consider the wider impact of any flexible working company policies they may choose to implement.

    Employers must ensure that any flexible working policies they are considering will not result in certain groups of employees being unfairly prejudiced. If any employees are put at a disadvantage from improper implementation of these policies, it may give rise to a discrimination claim.

    One example of this is termed the “childcare disparity” between men and women, whereby women are less likely to accommodate certain work patterns due to a greater burden of childcare responsibility. Employers must therefore consider these responsibilities and any other constraints that could impact employees’ ability to work flexibly.

    Likewise, flexible working opportunities should be extended to those unable to work from home to avoid benefitting only those with office-based roles. This could include job sharing, part-time working or flexi-time.

    Certain employee rights must also be upheld when working flexibly or remotely, including equal treatment to office-based employees, and access to the same training and promotion opportunities.

    Employers should remain mindful of their obligations towards data protection in cases where personal data in stored at an employees’ home and should ensure the same health and safety standards extend to home-based employees as those in the office.

    Conclusion

    The pandemic has had a huge impact on employees’ approaches to work and the need for flexibility in many cases, leaving companies forced to adapt to these changes as restrictions are lifted.

    While the Government considers plans to make flexible working the default, employers will need to weigh up the potential benefits, such as increased productivity, against potential negative impacts on collaboration and team cohesion.

    If you have concerns about how these changes could affect your business and how to handle requests for flexible working from staff then seek legal advice from a specialist employment lawyer who can advise you on keeping your company policy up to date and the best course of action when handling these requests.

    By Sharron Bhandal, senior associate in the employment team at Blaser Mills Law

    The pandemic has led to an increase in flexible working and, as restrictions continue to lift and employees return to the office, employers are anticipating an influx of requests around working remotely and flexibly.

    The Government has responded to this with a planned review later this year to examine a proposed expansion of employees’ rights regarding flexible working and working from home, with a Government spokesperson claiming the consultation will consider making flexible working the default.

    While there is no legal right for employees to work from home, it is important for employers to take this chance to review their current policies around flexible working, and their obligations should an employee make such a request.

    Responding to a statutory request

    Under the Employment Rights Act 1996, requesting flexible working arrangements is a statutory right for employees. An employee has the right to make this request if they have had the same employer for 26 weeks and may only make a statutory request once in any 12-month period.

    The employee must make this request in writing to their employer and should include the date of the application, the nature of the change in working conditions they are seeking, and when this change would come into effect.

    If an employee fails to attend a meeting to discuss their application or appeal and fails to attend a rearranged meeting without a good reason for example, illness, an employer can consider the request as withdrawn and must then inform the employee.

    When an employer receives a request, they must deal with it in a reasonable manner and notify the employee of the outcome, including the result of any appeal, within a 3-month period unless an extended timeframe has been agreed with the employee.

    If an employer chooses to reject a statutory request, they may only do so on one or more of the following statutory grounds:

    • Burden of additional costs on the business
    • Inability to reorganise work amongst existing staff
    • Inability to recruit additional staff
    • Detrimental impact on quality of work
    • Detrimental impact on work performance
    • Detrimental to meeting customer demand
    • Insufficient work for periods employee proposes to work
    • Planned structural changes to the workforce or business

    What constitutes a “reasonable manner”? 

    Requests for flexible working must be dealt with by an employer in a reasonable manner, and failure to do so could mean an employee has the right to complain to an employment tribunal.

    While an employee may not take their case to a tribunal simply because their application was denied, they may do so if their application was incorrectly treated as withdrawn or was rejected based on incorrect data. Dismissal or poor treatment for example, being denied a promotion or pay rise of an employee due to their request can likewise be grounds for a tribunal hearing.

    Employers should always ensure compliance with their own internal flexible working policies, along with the Acas code of practice on handling in a reasonable manner requests to work flexibly.

    Though there is no statutory right for an employee to appeal a decision on their request, offering an appeals process does allow an employer to demonstrate they are handling flexible working requests in a reasonable manner. In these cases, it is important that both the employer and employee follow the company procedure on appeals.

    Proper implementation of flexible working

    Along with a balanced approach to dealing with flexible working requests, it is also important for employers to consider the wider impact of any flexible working company policies they may choose to implement.

    Employers must ensure that any flexible working policies they are considering will not result in certain groups of employees being unfairly prejudiced. If any employees are put at a disadvantage from improper implementation of these policies, it may give rise to a discrimination claim.

    One example of this is termed the “childcare disparity” between men and women, whereby women are less likely to accommodate certain work patterns due to a greater burden of childcare responsibility. Employers must therefore consider these responsibilities and any other constraints that could impact employees’ ability to work flexibly.

    Likewise, flexible working opportunities should be extended to those unable to work from home to avoid benefitting only those with office-based roles. This could include job sharing, part-time working or flexi-time.

    Certain employee rights must also be upheld when working flexibly or remotely, including equal treatment to office-based employees, and access to the same training and promotion opportunities.

    Employers should remain mindful of their obligations towards data protection in cases where personal data in stored at an employees’ home and should ensure the same health and safety standards extend to home-based employees as those in the office.

    Conclusion

    The pandemic has had a huge impact on employees’ approaches to work and the need for flexibility in many cases, leaving companies forced to adapt to these changes as restrictions are lifted.

    While the Government considers plans to make flexible working the default, employers will need to weigh up the potential benefits, such as increased productivity, against potential negative impacts on collaboration and team cohesion.

    If you have concerns about how these changes could affect your business and how to handle requests for flexible working from staff then seek legal advice from a specialist employment lawyer who can advise you on keeping your company policy up to date and the best course of action when handling these requests.

    Related Posts
    Cybersecurity as a Profit Engine: Turning Financial Services Security into Measurable Business Value
    Cybersecurity as a Profit Engine: Turning Financial Services Security into Measurable Business Value
    How Investability Helps Companies Navigate Transformational Times
    How Investability Helps Companies Navigate Transformational Times
    88% of UK and US organisations concerned about state-sponsored cyber attacks as national threat levels surge, IO research reveals
    88% of UK and US organisations concerned about state-sponsored cyber attacks as national threat levels surge, IO research reveals
    One in three SME leaders do not fully understand cash flow, despite 82% facing cash flow problems
    One in three SME leaders do not fully understand cash flow, despite 82% facing cash flow problems
    Inside the Company that Predicted the Remote Work Mega-Trend Before It Became Mainstream
    Inside the Company that Predicted the Remote Work Mega-Trend Before It Became Mainstream
    SEO Consultant Adrian Czarnoleski on How to Increase Business Value Before Exit
    SEO Consultant Adrian Czarnoleski on How to Increase Business Value Before Exit
    No SOC 2, No Deal: Why You’re Already Losing Clients - and What You Can Do About It
    No SOC 2, No Deal: Why You’re Already Losing Clients - and What You Can Do About It
    Jose Tolosa Guides Organizations Forward with Clarity, Purpose, and Integrity
    Jose Tolosa Guides Organizations Forward with Clarity, Purpose, and Integrity
    Reducing Freight Costs to Drive Global Trade Expansion
    Reducing Freight Costs to Drive Global Trade Expansion
    The Psychology of Music in the Modern Workplace
    The Psychology of Music in the Modern Workplace
    Revealed: Low-Cost/No-Cost Marketing Hacks For Results Oriented Businesses
    Revealed: Low-Cost/No-Cost Marketing Hacks For Results Oriented Businesses
    Finance teams still stuck in spreadsheets as manual processes stall digital transformation
    Finance teams still stuck in spreadsheets as manual processes stall digital transformation

    Why waste money on news and opinions when you can access them for free?

    Take advantage of our newsletter subscription and stay informed on the go!

    Subscribe

    Previous Business PostOvercoming the challenges faced in supply chains
    Next Business PostOptimising your ecommerce strategy amid the return of traditional retail

    More from Business

    Explore more articles in the Business category

    The Future of Remote & Hybrid Leadership: Leading With Data-Driven Foresight

    The Future of Remote & Hybrid Leadership: Leading With Data-Driven Foresight

    2025-2030: The Next Technological Innovations for Business

    2025-2030: The Next Technological Innovations for Business

    The CFO’s New Playbook: 5 Ways AI Is Redefining Finance with Insights from Rishi Oberoi

    The CFO’s New Playbook: 5 Ways AI Is Redefining Finance with Insights from Rishi Oberoi

    Revolutionizing Payments: Secure, Scalable, Sovereign

    Revolutionizing Payments: Secure, Scalable, Sovereign

    Why Trademark Abuse in Paid Search Is a Growing Risk for Financial Institutions

    Why Trademark Abuse in Paid Search Is a Growing Risk for Financial Institutions

    E-commerce Customer Service: Tips

    E-commerce Customer Service: Tips

    When to Automate Your Warehouse: The Tipping Point for Operations Growth

    When to Automate Your Warehouse: The Tipping Point for Operations Growth

    Hurt at Work? 5 Financial Facts You Need to Know

    Hurt at Work? 5 Financial Facts You Need to Know

    Against the Odds: Resilience in Consumer Subsectors Offers Prime Opportunities for Investors

    Against the Odds: Resilience in Consumer Subsectors Offers Prime Opportunities for Investors

    Empower Your Workforce With Financial Wellness This Labor Day

    Empower Your Workforce With Financial Wellness This Labor Day

    Build a brand that stands out with five simple strategies, from defining your UVP to using storytelling and building loyalty. Find out more.

    Build a brand that stands out with five simple strategies, from defining your UVP to using storytelling and building loyalty. Find out more.

    The Hybrid Office Playbook for Financial Services: How to Design Hybrid Offices to Optimize People and Spaces

    The Hybrid Office Playbook for Financial Services: How to Design Hybrid Offices to Optimize People and Spaces

    View All Business Posts