Search
00
GBAF Logo
trophy
Top StoriesInterviewsBusinessFinanceBankingTechnologyInvestingTradingVideosAwardsMagazinesHeadlinesTrends

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest news and updates from our team.

Global Banking and Finance Review

Global Banking & Finance Review

Company

    GBAF Logo
    • About Us
    • Profile
    • Privacy & Cookie Policy
    • Terms of Use
    • Contact Us
    • Advertising
    • Submit Post
    • Latest News
    • Research Reports
    • Press Release
    • Awards▾
      • About the Awards
      • Awards TimeTable
      • Submit Nominations
      • Testimonials
      • Media Room
      • Award Winners
      • FAQ
    • Magazines▾
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 79
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 78
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 77
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 76
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 75
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 73
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 71
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 70
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 69
      • Global Banking & Finance Review Magazine Issue 66
    Top StoriesInterviewsBusinessFinanceBankingTechnologyInvestingTradingVideosAwardsMagazinesHeadlinesTrends

    Global Banking & Finance Review® is a leading financial portal and online magazine offering News, Analysis, Opinion, Reviews, Interviews & Videos from the world of Banking, Finance, Business, Trading, Technology, Investing, Brokerage, Foreign Exchange, Tax & Legal, Islamic Finance, Asset & Wealth Management.
    Copyright © 2010-2025 GBAF Publications Ltd - All Rights Reserved.

    ;
    Editorial & Advertiser disclosure

    Global Banking and Finance Review is an online platform offering news, analysis, and opinion on the latest trends, developments, and innovations in the banking and finance industry worldwide. The platform covers a diverse range of topics, including banking, insurance, investment, wealth management, fintech, and regulatory issues. The website publishes news, press releases, opinion and advertorials on various financial organizations, products and services which are commissioned from various Companies, Organizations, PR agencies, Bloggers etc. These commissioned articles are commercial in nature. This is not to be considered as financial advice and should be considered only for information purposes. It does not reflect the views or opinion of our website and is not to be considered an endorsement or a recommendation. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any information provided with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek Professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. We link to various third-party websites, affiliate sales networks, and to our advertising partners websites. When you view or click on certain links available on our articles, our partners may compensate us for displaying the content to you or make a purchase or fill a form. This will not incur any additional charges to you. To make things simpler for you to identity or distinguish advertised or sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles or links hosted on our site as a commercial article placement. We will not be responsible for any loss you may suffer as a result of any omission or inaccuracy on the website.

    Home > Trading > Tariffs, seizures expose U.S. solar industry’s vulnerability to imports
    Trading

    Tariffs, seizures expose U.S. solar industry’s vulnerability to imports

    Tariffs, seizures expose U.S. solar industry’s vulnerability to imports

    Published by maria gbaf

    Posted on September 28, 2021

    Featured image for article about Trading

    By Nichola Groom

    (Reuters) – Cheap imports have fueled the U.S. solar industry’s dramatic growth for years. Now, mounting trade and transport issues is exposing that dependence as a vulnerability, slowing shipments and putting big projects at risk, according to industry representatives.

    Tighter availability of foreign panels could hurt the booming industry and set back President Joe Biden’s effort to decarbonize the nation’s power sector, a centerpiece of his plan to combat climate change. Some 90% of U.S. solar panels are made overseas, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration.

    Among the issues clouding solar’s outlook is an attempt by U.S. authorities to block shipments of panels containing components potentially derived from forced labor in China’s Xinjiang region.

    The Biden administration imposed an import ban targeting China’s Hoshine Silicon Industry Co in June and since then, hundreds of megawatts of panels have been detained at the border, according to an industry source.

    U.S. Customs and Border Protection would not disclose the amount of solar products it has detained. China has denied that its solar components are produced with forced labor.

    At the same time, a tiny domestic solar manufacturing industry has submitted an anonymous petition calling on the U.S. Commerce Department to impose new tariffs on some imported panels over accusations of dumping products at artificially low prices.

    The Commerce Department is expected to decide this week whether to consider the request, which would affect imports from Vietnam, Thailand, and Malaysia.

    If imposed, those tariffs would jeopardize 18 gigawatts of solar projects by 2023, or enough to power more than 3 million homes, according to the U.S. Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA).

    The small group of domestic solar manufacturers say they remain anonymous because disclosure of their names “could lead to retribution against these companies and cause substantial harm.” Tim Brightbill, the group’s attorney, said the trade group’s claims were “wildly overstated.”

    U.S. solar developers say, however, that suppliers in Southeast Asia have already cut sales to the United States over fears their panels could get hit with retroactive levies if the Commerce Department proceeds.

    SUPPLY SQUEEZE

    Maritime shipments of solar modules into the United States were already down 11% in August compared to 2020, and down 2% for about the first three weeks of September, according to data from financial information provider S&P Global.

    “We are getting hit right now pretty hard,” Markus Wilhelm, chief executive of solar project developer Strata Solar, said during a press call organized by SEIA on Monday. “We are completely dependent on a global supply chain, so we are a little bit more vulnerable.”

    “We can’t get module manufacturers today to sign purchase orders that we need to deliver projects in the near term,” George Hershman, president of solar contractor Swinerton Renewable Energy, said on the call.

    The issues compound a global supply squeeze stemming from the coronavirus pandemic that has already hit other industries with rising costs and delays, impacting everything from bicycle sales to the availability of smartphones.

    The U.S. solar industry earlier this month said that its installations were running at a record pace despite the shipping bottlenecks and jump in costs, but that the new threats raised the risk of a future slowdown.

    Top renewable energy developer Nextera Energy Inc has led the push against the new duties in extensive filings with the Commerce Department, with support from EDF Renewables Inc, Clearway, Invenergy and Enel Green Power.

    In addition to the immediate threat of new duties, the U.S. International Trade Commission will decide by the end of this year whether to extend tariffs imposed by the Trump administration in 2018 on all foreign-made panels.

    Five domestic producers requested the extension, including the U.S. arms of Korea’s Hanwha Q CELLS and LG Electronics.

    One of the world’s largest panel makers, JinkoSolar, has been caught in the crosshairs of both the border seizures and the potential for new tariffs.

    The company said earlier this month that some of its solar panels had been stopped at the border by U.S. Customs. The company is also among the Chinese companies targeted by domestic petitioners seeking new tariffs.

    Roth Capital Partners analyst Philip Shen cut his price target on JinkoSolar’s stock to $51 from $58 on Sept. 16, citing the “one-two punch.”

    JinkoSolar did not respond to a request for comment.

    (Reporting by Nichola Groom; Editing by Aurora Ellis)

    By Nichola Groom

    (Reuters) – Cheap imports have fueled the U.S. solar industry’s dramatic growth for years. Now, mounting trade and transport issues is exposing that dependence as a vulnerability, slowing shipments and putting big projects at risk, according to industry representatives.

    Tighter availability of foreign panels could hurt the booming industry and set back President Joe Biden’s effort to decarbonize the nation’s power sector, a centerpiece of his plan to combat climate change. Some 90% of U.S. solar panels are made overseas, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration.

    Among the issues clouding solar’s outlook is an attempt by U.S. authorities to block shipments of panels containing components potentially derived from forced labor in China’s Xinjiang region.

    The Biden administration imposed an import ban targeting China’s Hoshine Silicon Industry Co in June and since then, hundreds of megawatts of panels have been detained at the border, according to an industry source.

    U.S. Customs and Border Protection would not disclose the amount of solar products it has detained. China has denied that its solar components are produced with forced labor.

    At the same time, a tiny domestic solar manufacturing industry has submitted an anonymous petition calling on the U.S. Commerce Department to impose new tariffs on some imported panels over accusations of dumping products at artificially low prices.

    The Commerce Department is expected to decide this week whether to consider the request, which would affect imports from Vietnam, Thailand, and Malaysia.

    If imposed, those tariffs would jeopardize 18 gigawatts of solar projects by 2023, or enough to power more than 3 million homes, according to the U.S. Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA).

    The small group of domestic solar manufacturers say they remain anonymous because disclosure of their names “could lead to retribution against these companies and cause substantial harm.” Tim Brightbill, the group’s attorney, said the trade group’s claims were “wildly overstated.”

    U.S. solar developers say, however, that suppliers in Southeast Asia have already cut sales to the United States over fears their panels could get hit with retroactive levies if the Commerce Department proceeds.

    SUPPLY SQUEEZE

    Maritime shipments of solar modules into the United States were already down 11% in August compared to 2020, and down 2% for about the first three weeks of September, according to data from financial information provider S&P Global.

    “We are getting hit right now pretty hard,” Markus Wilhelm, chief executive of solar project developer Strata Solar, said during a press call organized by SEIA on Monday. “We are completely dependent on a global supply chain, so we are a little bit more vulnerable.”

    “We can’t get module manufacturers today to sign purchase orders that we need to deliver projects in the near term,” George Hershman, president of solar contractor Swinerton Renewable Energy, said on the call.

    The issues compound a global supply squeeze stemming from the coronavirus pandemic that has already hit other industries with rising costs and delays, impacting everything from bicycle sales to the availability of smartphones.

    The U.S. solar industry earlier this month said that its installations were running at a record pace despite the shipping bottlenecks and jump in costs, but that the new threats raised the risk of a future slowdown.

    Top renewable energy developer Nextera Energy Inc has led the push against the new duties in extensive filings with the Commerce Department, with support from EDF Renewables Inc, Clearway, Invenergy and Enel Green Power.

    In addition to the immediate threat of new duties, the U.S. International Trade Commission will decide by the end of this year whether to extend tariffs imposed by the Trump administration in 2018 on all foreign-made panels.

    Five domestic producers requested the extension, including the U.S. arms of Korea’s Hanwha Q CELLS and LG Electronics.

    One of the world’s largest panel makers, JinkoSolar, has been caught in the crosshairs of both the border seizures and the potential for new tariffs.

    The company said earlier this month that some of its solar panels had been stopped at the border by U.S. Customs. The company is also among the Chinese companies targeted by domestic petitioners seeking new tariffs.

    Roth Capital Partners analyst Philip Shen cut his price target on JinkoSolar’s stock to $51 from $58 on Sept. 16, citing the “one-two punch.”

    JinkoSolar did not respond to a request for comment.

    (Reporting by Nichola Groom; Editing by Aurora Ellis)

    Related Posts
    What Is a Liquidity Provider – And Why Modern Brokers Can’t Function Without One
    What Is a Liquidity Provider – And Why Modern Brokers Can’t Function Without One
    OneFunded: Prop Firm Overview and Program Structure
    OneFunded: Prop Firm Overview and Program Structure
    What if You Can Actually Chat with Your Crypto Wallet?
    What if You Can Actually Chat with Your Crypto Wallet?
    The Growing Importance of Choosing the Right Crypto Broker in 2025
    The Growing Importance of Choosing the Right Crypto Broker in 2025
    The Rise of Algorithmic Trading Among Retail Investors in the UK
    The Rise of Algorithmic Trading Among Retail Investors in the UK
    Forex Trading for the 9-to-5er: A Realistic Path to a Second Income
    Forex Trading for the 9-to-5er: A Realistic Path to a Second Income
    Quality Matters: ZiNRai’s Focus on Empowering Traders with Precision and Purpose
    Quality Matters: ZiNRai’s Focus on Empowering Traders with Precision and Purpose
    MiCA Regulations and the Legal Requirements for Crypto Presales and Token Offerings in the European Union
    MiCA Regulations and the Legal Requirements for Crypto Presales and Token Offerings in the European Union
    Top Ways Forex Traders Benefit From Peer-to-Peer Learning
    Top Ways Forex Traders Benefit From Peer-to-Peer Learning
    Why High Leverage Remains Attractive to Forex Traders Worldwide
    Why High Leverage Remains Attractive to Forex Traders Worldwide
    XDC Network’s ETP Listing Signals the Maturing Convergence of Blockchain and Trade Finance
    XDC Network’s ETP Listing Signals the Maturing Convergence of Blockchain and Trade Finance
    Inside the Perp DEX Landscape: How Platforms Like Grvt and Hyperliquid Are Shaping Their Long-Term Vision
    Inside the Perp DEX Landscape: How Platforms Like Grvt and Hyperliquid Are Shaping Their Long-Term Vision

    Why waste money on news and opinions when you can access them for free?

    Take advantage of our newsletter subscription and stay informed on the go!

    Subscribe

    Previous Trading PostUK to start talks on joining trans-Pacific trade pact
    Next Trading PostBest brokers to operate in the United States 2021

    More from Trading

    Explore more articles in the Trading category

    Blending Theory and Practice: Building Stronger Forex Strategies

    Blending Theory and Practice: Building Stronger Forex Strategies

    Strategies for Professional CFD Traders: Tools and Company Support

    Strategies for Professional CFD Traders: Tools and Company Support

    Trust as the Cornerstone of Capital Markets

    Trust as the Cornerstone of Capital Markets

    UK Investors Reassess Trading Venues as Liquidity Shifts

    UK Investors Reassess Trading Venues as Liquidity Shifts

    Bitcoin Price Live: What Factors Influence Its Value?

    Bitcoin Price Live: What Factors Influence Its Value?

    Offshore Forex Brokers vs. U.S.-Regulated Brokers: A Risk Assessment

    Offshore Forex Brokers vs. U.S.-Regulated Brokers: A Risk Assessment

    The Broker Expo, Its Role in the Small Business World, and Everest Business Funding’s Role as Sponsor

    The Broker Expo, Its Role in the Small Business World, and Everest Business Funding’s Role as Sponsor

    Finding Your Edge with a Crypto-First Prop Firm

    Finding Your Edge with a Crypto-First Prop Firm

    Evaluating the Most Reliable Tools for Tracking Real-Time Cryptocurrency Prices

    Evaluating the Most Reliable Tools for Tracking Real-Time Cryptocurrency Prices

    MT5 vs MT4: Why More Brokers Are Moving to MetaTrader 5

    MT5 vs MT4: Why More Brokers Are Moving to MetaTrader 5

    From Central Banks to Retail Traders: Who Drives the Forex Market?

    From Central Banks to Retail Traders: Who Drives the Forex Market?

    Building a Winning Forex Portfolio: Tools and Resources You Can’t Ignore

    Building a Winning Forex Portfolio: Tools and Resources You Can’t Ignore

    View All Trading Posts