Search
00
GBAF Logo
trophy
Top StoriesInterviewsBusinessFinanceBankingTechnologyInvestingTradingVideosAwardsMagazinesHeadlinesTrends

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest news and updates from our team.

Global Banking & Finance Review®

Global Banking & Finance Review® - Subscribe to our newsletter

Company

    GBAF Logo
    • About Us
    • Advertising and Sponsorship
    • Profile & Readership
    • Contact Us
    • Latest News
    • Privacy & Cookies Policies
    • Terms of Use
    • Advertising Terms
    • Issue 81
    • Issue 80
    • Issue 79
    • Issue 78
    • Issue 77
    • Issue 76
    • Issue 75
    • Issue 74
    • Issue 73
    • Issue 72
    • Issue 71
    • Issue 70
    • View All
    • About the Awards
    • Awards Timetable
    • Awards Winners
    • Submit Nominations
    • Testimonials
    • Media Room
    • FAQ
    • Asset Management Awards
    • Brand of the Year Awards
    • Business Awards
    • Cash Management Banking Awards
    • Banking Technology Awards
    • CEO Awards
    • Customer Service Awards
    • CSR Awards
    • Deal of the Year Awards
    • Corporate Governance Awards
    • Corporate Banking Awards
    • Digital Transformation Awards
    • Fintech Awards
    • Education & Training Awards
    • ESG & Sustainability Awards
    • ESG Awards
    • Forex Banking Awards
    • Innovation Awards
    • Insurance & Takaful Awards
    • Investment Banking Awards
    • Investor Relations Awards
    • Leadership Awards
    • Islamic Banking Awards
    • Real Estate Awards
    • Project Finance Awards
    • Process & Product Awards
    • Telecommunication Awards
    • HR & Recruitment Awards
    • Trade Finance Awards
    • The Next 100 Global Awards
    • Wealth Management Awards
    • Travel Awards
    • Years of Excellence Awards
    • Publishing Principles
    • Ownership & Funding
    • Corrections Policy
    • Editorial Code of Ethics
    • Diversity & Inclusion Policy
    • Fact Checking Policy
    Original content: Global Banking and Finance Review - https://www.globalbankingandfinance.com

    A global financial intelligence and recognition platform delivering authoritative insights, data-driven analysis, and institutional benchmarking across Banking, Capital Markets, Investment, Technology, and Financial Infrastructure.

    Copyright © 2010-2026 - All Rights Reserved. | Sitemap | Tags

    Editorial & Advertiser disclosure

    Global Banking & Finance Review® is an online platform offering news, analysis, and opinion on the latest trends, developments, and innovations in the banking and finance industry worldwide. The platform covers a diverse range of topics, including banking, insurance, investment, wealth management, fintech, and regulatory issues. The website publishes news, press releases, opinion and advertorials on various financial organizations, products and services which are commissioned from various Companies, Organizations, PR agencies, Bloggers etc. These commissioned articles are commercial in nature. This is not to be considered as financial advice and should be considered only for information purposes. It does not reflect the views or opinion of our website and is not to be considered an endorsement or a recommendation. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any information provided with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek Professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. We link to various third-party websites, affiliate sales networks, and to our advertising partners websites. When you view or click on certain links available on our articles, our partners may compensate us for displaying the content to you or make a purchase or fill a form. This will not incur any additional charges to you. To make things simpler for you to identity or distinguish advertised or sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles or links hosted on our site as a commercial article placement. We will not be responsible for any loss you may suffer as a result of any omission or inaccuracy on the website.

    1. Home
    2. >Business
    3. >RESEARCH FINDS UK SALES REPS LOSE SIX WEEKS A YEAR TO ADMIN TASKS
    Business

    Research Finds UK Sales Reps Lose Six Weeks a Year to Admin Tasks

    Published by Gbaf News

    Posted on December 20, 2017

    6 min read

    Last updated: January 21, 2026

    Add as preferred source on Google
    Image of Kim Leadbeater addressing the media about proposed changes to the UK's assisted dying law, emphasizing the removal of High Court judge sign-off to enhance the legislative process.
    Lawmaker Kim Leadbeater discusses UK's assisted dying law changes - Global Banking & Finance Review
    Why waste money on news and opinion when you can access them for free?

    Take advantage of our newsletter subscription and stay informed on the go!

    Subscribe

    Lack of automation capabilities syphon significant time, decreasing the value of CRM software investments

    New research from NewVoiceMedia, a leading global provider of cloud contact centre and inside sales technology, reveals that sales professionals who use a CRM system are losing an average of six weeks a year completing manual administrative tasks that could be automated with the right computer telephony integration(CTI)investment. When applied over an entire inside sales team, this represents a productivity loss equivalent to nearly one and a half reps per year¹.

    The study, conducted by global market research firm Opinion Matters, finds that despite an increase in CRM software spending, automation remains underutilised, and 61 percent of sales reps say their business would benefit from advancing its inside sales technology. Universally, companies are making significant investments in their CRM platform. A September 2015 survey from Forbes Insights and Brainshark revealed that 55 percent of executives were investing in sales enablement technologies to improve sales productivity and more than half were making analytics and CRM software investments (54 percent and 53 percent respectively.) However, according to NewVoiceMedia’s research, 76 percent of sales reps must still manually update their CRM record after a call. On average, they spend 34 minutes a day in data entry, which, over the course of a year, amounts to 17 complete workdays. Additionally, the average sales person spends 24 minutes a day manually entering prospects’ phone numbers, amounting to 12 workdays a year – time that could be focused on closing deals.

    Specifically, sales teams are neglecting elements of automation that could be modernised with CTI, and its cost vs. value perception is largely misunderstood. The majority of companies (69 percent) believe cost is the top obstacle to adopting CTI, even though solutions that integrate with CRM platforms absorb substantial costs from administrative tasks.

    With NewVoiceMedia’s ContactWorld technology, Six Pack Shortcuts reported savings of 276 minutes per day thanks to its click-to-dial function, which, coupled with other features, has enabled the company to achieve a 500 percent growth in sales. BrightCurrent also increased its productivity with ContactWorld, handling a 350 percent increase in lead volume since implementation.

    “Sales reps who don’t have the best, up-to-date technology often feel behind the curve”, says Dennis Fois, President and COO of NewVoiceMedia. “Our research makes it clear that companies have made definitive efforts to improve their sales processes, but we are surprised at the amount of manual effort many salespeople still have as part of their roles. Businesses should be investing in automating monotonous and time-consuming administrative functions, so that sales teams can focus more on selling”.

    Other key findings 

    • Only 43 percent of sales professionals can identify corresponding previous interactions with their prospects and customers, and less than a quarter (23 percent) have a system in place to intelligently route callers to the most appropriate team member.
    • 22 percent of reps reported that they cannot present a local number to their prospect, regardless of the region they are currently calling from.
    • 46 percent of sales professionals’ lack technology that can show them the hottest leads to follow-up on first.
    • After a lost deal, only 45 percent of sales people solicit feedback every time, and six percent never ask.

    Lack of automation capabilities syphon significant time, decreasing the value of CRM software investments

    New research from NewVoiceMedia, a leading global provider of cloud contact centre and inside sales technology, reveals that sales professionals who use a CRM system are losing an average of six weeks a year completing manual administrative tasks that could be automated with the right computer telephony integration(CTI)investment. When applied over an entire inside sales team, this represents a productivity loss equivalent to nearly one and a half reps per year¹.

    The study, conducted by global market research firm Opinion Matters, finds that despite an increase in CRM software spending, automation remains underutilised, and 61 percent of sales reps say their business would benefit from advancing its inside sales technology. Universally, companies are making significant investments in their CRM platform. A September 2015 survey from Forbes Insights and Brainshark revealed that 55 percent of executives were investing in sales enablement technologies to improve sales productivity and more than half were making analytics and CRM software investments (54 percent and 53 percent respectively.) However, according to NewVoiceMedia’s research, 76 percent of sales reps must still manually update their CRM record after a call. On average, they spend 34 minutes a day in data entry, which, over the course of a year, amounts to 17 complete workdays. Additionally, the average sales person spends 24 minutes a day manually entering prospects’ phone numbers, amounting to 12 workdays a year – time that could be focused on closing deals.

    Specifically, sales teams are neglecting elements of automation that could be modernised with CTI, and its cost vs. value perception is largely misunderstood. The majority of companies (69 percent) believe cost is the top obstacle to adopting CTI, even though solutions that integrate with CRM platforms absorb substantial costs from administrative tasks.

    With NewVoiceMedia’s ContactWorld technology, Six Pack Shortcuts reported savings of 276 minutes per day thanks to its click-to-dial function, which, coupled with other features, has enabled the company to achieve a 500 percent growth in sales. BrightCurrent also increased its productivity with ContactWorld, handling a 350 percent increase in lead volume since implementation.

    “Sales reps who don’t have the best, up-to-date technology often feel behind the curve”, says Dennis Fois, President and COO of NewVoiceMedia. “Our research makes it clear that companies have made definitive efforts to improve their sales processes, but we are surprised at the amount of manual effort many salespeople still have as part of their roles. Businesses should be investing in automating monotonous and time-consuming administrative functions, so that sales teams can focus more on selling”.

    Other key findings 

    • Only 43 percent of sales professionals can identify corresponding previous interactions with their prospects and customers, and less than a quarter (23 percent) have a system in place to intelligently route callers to the most appropriate team member.
    • 22 percent of reps reported that they cannot present a local number to their prospect, regardless of the region they are currently calling from.
    • 46 percent of sales professionals’ lack technology that can show them the hottest leads to follow-up on first.
    • After a lost deal, only 45 percent of sales people solicit feedback every time, and six percent never ask.
    More from Business

    Explore more articles in the Business category

    Image for Nominate Now: Chairman of the Year 2026
    Nominate Now: Chairman of the Year 2026
    Image for Submit Your Entry Today for CEO of the Year 2026
    Submit Your Entry Today for CEO of the Year 2026
    Image for Submit Your Entry Today for Best Management Team 2026
    Submit Your Entry Today for Best Management Team 2026
    Image for Nominate Your Team: Best Innovation Management Team 2026
    Nominate Your Team: Best Innovation Management Team 2026
    Image for Submit Your Entry for Years of Excellence Awards 2026
    Submit Your Entry for Years of Excellence Awards 2026
    Image for Nominations Open for Travel & Hospitality Awards 2026
    Nominations Open for Travel & Hospitality Awards 2026
    Image for Submit Your Entry Today for Telecom Awards 2026
    Submit Your Entry Today for Telecom Awards 2026
    Image for Submit Your Entries for The Next 100 Global Awards 2026
    Submit Your Entries for the Next 100 Global Awards 2026
    Image for Submit Your Entry: Public Sector & Governance Excellence Awards 2026
    Submit Your Entry: Public Sector & Governance Excellence Awards 2026
    Image for Nominations Invited for Real Estate Development Awards 2026
    Nominations Invited for Real Estate Development Awards 2026
    Image for Submit Your Entry: Process & Product Awards 2026
    Submit Your Entry: Process & Product Awards 2026
    Image for Call for Entries: HR & Recruitment Awards 2026
    Call for Entries: HR & Recruitment Awards 2026
    View All Business Posts
    Previous Business PostLate Payment Worsens for UK Smes
    Next Business PostRetailers May Struggle to Comply With Impending Accountancy Rules