Raj Chatterjee1
Top Stories

MORRISON & FOERSTER WINS 10TH CIRCUIT DISMISSAL OF SECURITIES CLASS ACTION AGAINST MEDICAL DEVICE COMPANY

Published by Gbaf News

Posted on October 29, 2014

2 min read

· Last updated: April 28, 2020

Add as preferred source on Google

Background of the Case Against AspenBio

AspenBio Pharma had been accused of misleading investors over prospects for appendicitis test; MoFo partners Raj Chatterjee and Mark Foster follow up 2012 district court win with appeals court affirmation

Morrison & Foerster won the complete dismissal of a securities class action against medical diagnostics company AspenBio Pharma with the ruling on October 17, 2014, at the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals affirming a district court dismissal in 2012.

Raj Chatterjee

Raj Chatterjee

Morrison & Foerster Legal Team and Strategy

San Francisco-based litigation partners Jim Brosnahan, Raj Chatterjee and Mark Foster led the Morrison & Foerster team, which had represented Castle Rock, Colo.-based AspenBio (renamed Venaxis in 2012) since the suit, Wolfe v. AspenBio, was filed in 2010.

Plaintiffs' Allegations and Claims

Plaintiffs alleged that AspenBio and certain officers misled investors about preliminary testing results for an appendicitis diagnostic in development, as well as about the viability, uniqueness, and potential applications of the product and its prospects for approval by the Food and Drug Administration. The diagnostic is initially being developed for children, adolescents, and young adults and is designed to assist doctors in ruling out appendicitis without the use of CT scans, particularly in an emergency room setting.

District Court Dismissal and Appeals Process

In 2012 Messrs. Chatterjee and Foster filed a successful motion for dismissal in Colorado district court, and had previously obtained a stay of a parallel shareholder derivative lawsuit. The plaintiffs challenged the dismissal on appeal, and Mr. Chatterjee presented oral argument before the Tenth Circuit in September 2013.

Reaction to the Tenth Circuit Ruling

“We are thrilled that the Tenth Circuit has upheld the dismissal of this class action against our client Venaxis. We’ve been challenging these cases since 2010 and have obtained dismissals at every stage, beginning at the trial level and now prevailing at the appellate stage,” said Mr. Chatterjee. “With the litigation resolved, Venaxis can continue to focus on growing a company and developing a product that could substantially advance the public health.”

Key Takeaways

  • Morrison & Foerster secured dismissal of a securities class action concerning AspenBio’s appendicitis test AppyScore.
  • Both the U.S. District Court (September 13, 2012) and the Tenth Circuit (October 17, 2014) affirmed dismissal for failure to plead scienter under PSLRA.
  • Appellants failed to demonstrate that AspenBio executives knowingly made false or misleading statements about AppyScore’s performance.
  • Venaxis (formerly AspenBio) can now focus on product development without lingering litigation risk.

References

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the lawsuit about?
Investors alleged that AspenBio (later Venaxis) misled them regarding the effectiveness and development prospects of its appendicitis diagnostic AppyScore.
Who represented AspenBio and what was their success?
Morrison & Foerster, led by partners Raj Chatterjee and Mark Foster, achieved dismissal at the district court in September 2012 and secured affirmation at the Tenth Circuit on October 17, 2014.
Why did the courts dismiss the case?
Courts found plaintiffs failed to adequately plead scienter—i.e., no strong inference that AspenBio executives knowingly or recklessly misrepresented key facts under the PSLRA heightened standard.
What does this mean for AspenBio/Venaxis?
With litigation resolved, the company can refocus efforts on advancing its diagnostic product without distraction from these legal proceedings.

Tags

Related Articles

More from Top Stories

Explore more articles in the Top Stories category