Published by Global Banking & Finance Review®
Posted on April 15, 2026
2 min readLast updated: April 15, 2026
Add as preferred source on GoogleRystad Energy now estimates Middle East energy‑linked infrastructure repair and restoration could cost up to $58 billion (average ~$46 billion), a sharp rise from an initial $25 billion estimate, due to expanded damage before the April 8 ceasefire. Oil & gas facilities may account for up to $50 bill
April 15 (Reuters) - The Middle East conflict could saddle the region with as much as $58 billion in repair costs for energy-linked infrastructure, with oil and gas facilities alone accounting for up to $50 billion, according to a report by Rystad Energy.
The estimate marks a sharp increase from the research firm's initial $25 billion projection three weeks ago, reflecting a broader scope of damage before an April 8 ceasefire between the U.S. and Iran.
"Repair work does not create new capacity. It redirects existing capacity, and that redirection will be felt in project delays and into inflation far beyond the Middle East," Rystad senior analyst Karan Satwani said.
"The $58 billion bill is the headline, but the knock-on effects on energy investment timelines globally may prove just as significant."
Rystad said total repair spending is likely to average around $46 billion, with downstream refining and petrochemical assets accounting for the largest share due to their complexity and extent of damage.
Industrial, power, and desalination assets may add a further $3 billion to $8 billion in costs, the report added.
Recovery timelines are starting to diverge between assets and countries, showcasing differences in domestic execution capabilities and access to supply chains, Rystad added.
Iran faces the most widespread damage, with repair costs potentially reaching $19 billion, affecting gas processing, refining and export infrastructure.
In contrast, Qatar's impact is more concentrated but technically complex, particularly at its Ras Laffan industrial hub, where repair work may overlap with ongoing LNG expansion projects.
Rystad said engineering and construction will account for the largest share of spending, but delays in procuring critical equipment will likely dictate recovery timelines.
According to Rystad, procuring equipment and workers remains the biggest challenge.
(Reporting by Pranav Mathur in Bengalurul; Editing by Leroy Leo)
According to Rystad Energy, repair costs could reach up to $58 billion, with oil and gas facilities accounting for up to $50 billion.
Iran faces the most widespread damage, with repair costs potentially reaching $19 billion.
Procuring critical equipment and workers is the biggest challenge, impacting recovery timelines.
Repair work redirects existing capacity, causing project delays and contributing to inflation beyond the Middle East.
Refining and petrochemical assets account for the largest share of damage due to their complexity.
Explore more articles in the Finance category
