Editorial & Advertiser Disclosure Global Banking And Finance Review is an independent publisher which offers News, information, Analysis, Opinion, Press Releases, Reviews, Research reports covering various economies, industries, products, services and companies. The content available on globalbankingandfinance.com is sourced by a mixture of different methods which is not limited to content produced and supplied by various staff writers, journalists, freelancers, individuals, organizations, companies, PR agencies Sponsored Posts etc. The information available on this website is purely for educational and informational purposes only. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any of the information provided at globalbankingandfinance.com with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. Globalbankingandfinance.com also links to various third party websites and we cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of the information provided by third party websites. Links from various articles on our site to third party websites are a mixture of non-sponsored links and sponsored links. Only a very small fraction of the links which point to external websites are affiliate links. Some of the links which you may click on our website may link to various products and services from our partners who may compensate us if you buy a service or product or fill a form or install an app. This will not incur additional cost to you. A very few articles on our website are sponsored posts or paid advertorials. These are marked as sponsored posts at the bottom of each post. For avoidance of any doubts and to make it easier for you to differentiate sponsored or non-sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles on our site or all links to external websites as sponsored . Please note that some of the services or products which we talk about carry a high level of risk and may not be suitable for everyone. These may be complex services or products and we request the readers to consider this purely from an educational standpoint. The information provided on this website is general in nature. Global Banking & Finance Review expressly disclaims any liability without any limitation which may arise directly or indirectly from the use of such information.

“Leaving LIBOR Behind” – How to Transition Safely and Securely to Risk-free Rate Benchmarks

By Martijn Groot, VP Marketing and Strategy, Asset Control

Some of the most important time series in the world – the interest rate reference rates for the world’s major currencies – are being reformed. This includes a transition from the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) – whose credibility as a benchmark has been undermined over time – to SOFT in the US, to ESTER in the Eurozone and to SONIA in the UK. Across Europe, there is regulatory impetus behind this transition in the form of the Benchmark Regulation (BMR).

 Scoping the Challenge

This reform is putting huge pressure on financial services firms the world over. At a macro level, it means they will have to replace their interest rate curves and any contracts or derivative instruments that depend on those. It also means that they may have to maintain two sets of interest rate curves in the interim – which many systems have not been designed for.

For firms today, this transition is likely to bring huge disruption, comparable in terms of its impact to the introduction of the EURO that replaced national currencies across Europe around twenty years ago. It places a vast number of new tasks onto firms; ‘to do’ lists. That’s because LIBOR is effectively embedded in firms’ operating models and therefore transitioning away from it will affect how they manage risk and price their contracts amongst a wide range of other potential impacts.

More specifically, firms will, for example, need to scan their pricing, risk and front office system to use the new curves. And they will also be required to re-paper existing contracts with maturity dates beyond LIBOR end-of-life.

Perhaps even more urgently, they will need to review and revise their market data management, including setting up a parallel set of curves based on the new reference rates, managing two sets of curves during a transition period; creating historical data sets that draw from both sets for future risk management needs, and making sure the pricing, risk and front office systems are being fed with the new curves. This is not simply a matter of replacing one number with another as the new regimes will differ also in the time (T or T+1) when rates are made available and the term structure covered. This will also require audit trails and ways to identify which products use which curves.

Finding a Way Forward

All in all, it is a complex undertaking. Most financial services firms don’t have the time, money, in-house expertise or resource to handle it seamlessly and efficiently in isolation. That’s why opting for a managed services approach can make sense in this context, allowing firms to cost-effectively process change, while continuing to focus on their client and differentiating services.

It is also why Asset Control has introduced Libor Pass porting, supporting firms’ journey from the old to the new interest rate benchmark regime. Libor Pass porting is an example service of our AC PaSS managed services set in data management, providing both cost-effective, target data management use cases and off the shelf business logic and data checks that incorporate best practices. It comprises off the shelf integration with selected market data providers and the configuration and distribution options that supplement your infrastructure.