Published by Gbaf News
Posted on June 1, 2018
7 min readLast updated: January 21, 2026
Add as preferred source on Google
Political uncertainty in Italy is roiling financial markets. Scope Ratings explains why political and market uncertainty is unlikely to end soon.
In the midst of Italian market turmoil, Scope’s Dr Giacomo Barisone and Dennis Shen answer three of the most pressing questions investors are asking.
Can unsettled Italian markets find a more stable footing?
A period of higher volatility will probably persist at least in the near term. It’s important to note that there appears to be a new paradigm in Italian politics – with the greater presence of eurosceptic, populist groups looking as if it’s here to stay, rather than proving to be a passing phenomenon. This ensures a degree of uncertainty relating to possible tensions between a future Italian government with the nation’s Constitution and Europe, the possibility of repeat elections, and potential market-unfriendly policies. For instance, in the scenario of repeat elections, the right-wing Lega stands in a good position to strengthen its parliamentary footing, with around 25% of voting intentions in the latest polls, up from 17.4% in the March elections.
Scope spoke of the risk of a ‘meaningful repricing’ in Italian markets in its February comment before the March election. Italy’s 10-year yield spread to Bunds stands at about 260 bps on Wednesday, after lows of 114 bps only a month back. However, Scope notes that Italy holds a relatively long average government debt maturity of 6.9 years. Alongside a primary surplus, this should help mitigate the pace of the impact of present higher government yields on debt sustainability for the moment.
It remains to be seen whether stability might return to Italian markets without more direct action from policymakers, including via alternative solutions in domestic politics or verbal intervention from the European Central Bank (ECB-POLICY-3fdc7763-f2c0-4c30-b494-8614852eaf43>ECB-POLICY-SOURCES-e4bab80d-7aeb-4e49-a29a-ce14e1595c6d>ECB-POLICY-3fdc7763-f2c0-4c30-b494-8614852eaf43>ECB). There’s been discussion in the financial community around Outright Monetary Transactions (OMT), in which the ECB-POLICY-3fdc7763-f2c0-4c30-b494-8614852eaf43>ECB-POLICY-SOURCES-e4bab80d-7aeb-4e49-a29a-ce14e1595c6d>ECB-POLICY-3fdc7763-f2c0-4c30-b494-8614852eaf43>ECB might intervene in Italian sovereign markets; however, Scope notes that the activation of OMT requires a government to apply to the euro area’s bailout facility with its associated conditions – a prospect still far off for Italy.
Given heavily divided opinions on Italy’s status in the euro, is there risk of an ‘Ital-exit’?
While Lega and the Five Star Movement (M5S) have somewhat facilitated renewed conversations around euro exit with their stance against the EU and market forces, Scope believes the possibility of a euro exit event itself is exaggerated, as it was during the debt crisis. Despite the return of talk about Ital-exit, Scope maintains its view outlined in its February comment (linked above) that a successful exit from the euro is unlikely.
Even in the case in which a populist, eurosceptic government were to come into power, rhetoric (or actions) centred on a euro or EU exit or a parallel currency falters once the significant economic, financial and political cost and complications around such an exit strategy become clear. The lessons learned in the Greek crisis of 2015 and those still being learned in the UK’s planned exit from the EU should not be so easily forgotten and discounted. In addition, holding an exit referendum in Italy requires a complicated legislative process, with a constitutional amendment (requiring two votes at a two-thirds majority in each house of parliament, or failing that, a preliminary referendum to facilitate a euro referendum) needed before a referendum on the euro could be held.
What are the implications of current uncertainty and risks for Italy’s ratings?
Scope is monitoring closely the current political and market dynamics, alongside the implications of the Italian crisis vis-à-vis other sovereign markets. We rate the Italian sovereign at a ‘A-’ rating with a ‘Stable’ Outlook. However, we’ve highlighted in the past that political and policy uncertainties and the potentially limited scope that a new Italian government implements the needed economic reforms to tackle Italy’s outsized debt stock (of 132% of GDP) raise questions on the sovereign’s outlook and rating trajectory. Scope is due to update its rating view on Italy by 8 June 2018.
Please click here for Scope’s latest rating announcement on Italy, dated 30 June 2017.
Political uncertainty in Italy is roiling financial markets. Scope Ratings explains why political and market uncertainty is unlikely to end soon.
In the midst of Italian market turmoil, Scope’s Dr Giacomo Barisone and Dennis Shen answer three of the most pressing questions investors are asking.
Can unsettled Italian markets find a more stable footing?
A period of higher volatility will probably persist at least in the near term. It’s important to note that there appears to be a new paradigm in Italian politics – with the greater presence of eurosceptic, populist groups looking as if it’s here to stay, rather than proving to be a passing phenomenon. This ensures a degree of uncertainty relating to possible tensions between a future Italian government with the nation’s Constitution and Europe, the possibility of repeat elections, and potential market-unfriendly policies. For instance, in the scenario of repeat elections, the right-wing Lega stands in a good position to strengthen its parliamentary footing, with around 25% of voting intentions in the latest polls, up from 17.4% in the March elections.
Scope spoke of the risk of a ‘meaningful repricing’ in Italian markets in its February comment before the March election. Italy’s 10-year yield spread to Bunds stands at about 260 bps on Wednesday, after lows of 114 bps only a month back. However, Scope notes that Italy holds a relatively long average government debt maturity of 6.9 years. Alongside a primary surplus, this should help mitigate the pace of the impact of present higher government yields on debt sustainability for the moment.
It remains to be seen whether stability might return to Italian markets without more direct action from policymakers, including via alternative solutions in domestic politics or verbal intervention from the European Central Bank (ECB-POLICY-3fdc7763-f2c0-4c30-b494-8614852eaf43>ECB-POLICY-SOURCES-e4bab80d-7aeb-4e49-a29a-ce14e1595c6d>ECB-POLICY-3fdc7763-f2c0-4c30-b494-8614852eaf43>ECB). There’s been discussion in the financial community around Outright Monetary Transactions (OMT), in which the ECB-POLICY-3fdc7763-f2c0-4c30-b494-8614852eaf43>ECB-POLICY-SOURCES-e4bab80d-7aeb-4e49-a29a-ce14e1595c6d>ECB-POLICY-3fdc7763-f2c0-4c30-b494-8614852eaf43>ECB might intervene in Italian sovereign markets; however, Scope notes that the activation of OMT requires a government to apply to the euro area’s bailout facility with its associated conditions – a prospect still far off for Italy.
Given heavily divided opinions on Italy’s status in the euro, is there risk of an ‘Ital-exit’?
While Lega and the Five Star Movement (M5S) have somewhat facilitated renewed conversations around euro exit with their stance against the EU and market forces, Scope believes the possibility of a euro exit event itself is exaggerated, as it was during the debt crisis. Despite the return of talk about Ital-exit, Scope maintains its view outlined in its February comment (linked above) that a successful exit from the euro is unlikely.
Even in the case in which a populist, eurosceptic government were to come into power, rhetoric (or actions) centred on a euro or EU exit or a parallel currency falters once the significant economic, financial and political cost and complications around such an exit strategy become clear. The lessons learned in the Greek crisis of 2015 and those still being learned in the UK’s planned exit from the EU should not be so easily forgotten and discounted. In addition, holding an exit referendum in Italy requires a complicated legislative process, with a constitutional amendment (requiring two votes at a two-thirds majority in each house of parliament, or failing that, a preliminary referendum to facilitate a euro referendum) needed before a referendum on the euro could be held.
What are the implications of current uncertainty and risks for Italy’s ratings?
Scope is monitoring closely the current political and market dynamics, alongside the implications of the Italian crisis vis-à-vis other sovereign markets. We rate the Italian sovereign at a ‘A-’ rating with a ‘Stable’ Outlook. However, we’ve highlighted in the past that political and policy uncertainties and the potentially limited scope that a new Italian government implements the needed economic reforms to tackle Italy’s outsized debt stock (of 132% of GDP) raise questions on the sovereign’s outlook and rating trajectory. Scope is due to update its rating view on Italy by 8 June 2018.
Please click here for Scope’s latest rating announcement on Italy, dated 30 June 2017.
Explore more articles in the Interviews category
