Editorial & Advertiser Disclosure Global Banking And Finance Review is an independent publisher which offers News, information, Analysis, Opinion, Press Releases, Reviews, Research reports covering various economies, industries, products, services and companies. The content available on globalbankingandfinance.com is sourced by a mixture of different methods which is not limited to content produced and supplied by various staff writers, journalists, freelancers, individuals, organizations, companies, PR agencies Sponsored Posts etc. The information available on this website is purely for educational and informational purposes only. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any of the information provided at globalbankingandfinance.com with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. Globalbankingandfinance.com also links to various third party websites and we cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of the information provided by third party websites. Links from various articles on our site to third party websites are a mixture of non-sponsored links and sponsored links. Only a very small fraction of the links which point to external websites are affiliate links. Some of the links which you may click on our website may link to various products and services from our partners who may compensate us if you buy a service or product or fill a form or install an app. This will not incur additional cost to you. A very few articles on our website are sponsored posts or paid advertorials. These are marked as sponsored posts at the bottom of each post. For avoidance of any doubts and to make it easier for you to differentiate sponsored or non-sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles on our site or all links to external websites as sponsored . Please note that some of the services or products which we talk about carry a high level of risk and may not be suitable for everyone. These may be complex services or products and we request the readers to consider this purely from an educational standpoint. The information provided on this website is general in nature. Global Banking & Finance Review expressly disclaims any liability without any limitation which may arise directly or indirectly from the use of such information.

IS THE TUG OF WAR OVER TERMS AT AN END?

Andrew Jess, VP Basware UK

Buyers and suppliers have always been locked into a tug of war over terms. As one side gets the upper hand, the other would be pulled over the line. However, squeezing price, year after year, against a backdrop of rising inflation, has become unsustainable. This is not to detract from procurement teams or contract negotiators. However, if consistent drops are delivered year after year you have to wonder why the original price point was so out of line. The reality is that efficiencies and cost reductions are not as simple as beating a lower price out of your supplier. But push those cost reductions too far, and you increase the supplier risk and potentially compromise the service you’ll receive.  More companies are becoming aware of the dangers of squeezing suppliers too much. Without price per unit decreases to deliver reductions in expenses many businesses are looking to alternative means to reduce costs in the procurement process. In the process many are finding new benefits from their business networks.

Andrew Jess
Andrew Jess

Whether joint products and services, flexible credit or access to a network of new partners and customers, buyer/supplier collaboration can bring huge benefits to the wider business. Whilst historically the negotiator played their cards close to their chest, collaboration requires greater transparency, allowing suppliers and customers into financial and procurement processes. Without open discussions and transparency around the status of payments and invoices, both internally and externally I might add, it’s very difficult to realise the benefits of buyer/supplier collaboration.

More often than not each business’ goals are more compatible than many may think. Both want to expand their business, both want to hold onto their cash for longer, both want to get paid quicker and both want a clearer view of the risks they are bringing into their business when they work with new suppliers or buyers. A rash of new services have emerged that allow both sides of the battle to get what they want, provided they play nice. Alternative payment services such as invoice financing, where both have to provide information about invoice status and payment, can mean both sides get to hold onto their cash for longer.

The virtues of business networks are also relatively unsung heroes when it comes to wider business impact. These networks present opportunities to find new customers, service providers and partners. When these previously unseen communities are made visible by open B2B commerce networks procurement and finance professionals can spot new opportunities and areas of overlapping interest.

Whilst contract negotiators will still salivate over percentage decreases more businesses are becoming open to the additional opportunities that buyer/supplier collaboration can create. As the economy emerges blinking from long stagnation and recession I hope this habit continues and our B2B communities benefit as a result.