In response to recent litigation developments, including todays decision in the International Trade Commission, Intels general counsel, Steve Rodgers, has written the following:
In July 2017, Qualcomm launched a worldwide campaign of patent litigation as part of its efforts to eliminate competition and preserve its unlawful no license, no chips regime, which has already been found to violate competition laws across the globe. Indeed, Qualcomm has already been fined $975 million in China, $850 million in Korea, $1.2 billion by the European Commission, and $773 million in Taiwan (although the case later settled for a reduced fine) for its anticompetitive practices. Qualcomm has also been found to be in violation of Japanese competition law, and the U.S. Federal Trade Commission is pursuing claims in federal court against it for alleged violation of U.S. antitrust law.
Qualcomm has had a lot to say publicly about its litigation campaign “ and about Intel. It has publicly disparaged Intels products “ products created by the innovation and hard work of dedicated teams of scientists and engineers at Intel. It has asked a judge to order a customer not to purchase Intels modems, claiming, among other things, that Intels engineers could have made their inventions only by purloining ideas from Qualcomm. It has claimed that its patents form the very core of modern mobile communication technologies and networks, and extend even into future technologies.
It is easy to say things. But Intels track record is clear. Intel has been one of the worlds leading technology innovators for more than 50 years. We are proud of our engineers and employees who bring the worlds best technology solutions to market through hard work, sweat, risk-taking and great ideas. Every day, we push the boundaries of computing and communication technologies. And, the proof is in the pudding: Last year, the U.S. Patent Office awarded more patents to Intel than to Qualcomm.
For the most part, we have chosen, and will continue to choose, to respond to Qualcomms statements in court, not in public. This week, in one lawsuit, Qualcomm failed to win its case on 88 patent claims it said were infringed by products, including Intels modem. And, in another case, a federal judge found considerable, compelling common proof that Qualcomm has required companies to accept a separate license to Qualcomms cellular [standard essential patents] in order to gain access to Qualcomms modem chips. This is the no license, no chips scheme that has been found to be part of Qualcomms anticompetitive conduct challenged in so many countries.
WANT TO BUILD A FINANCIAL EMPIRE?
Subscribe to the Global Banking & Finance Review Newsletter for FREE Get Access to Exclusive Reports to Save Time & Money
By using this form you agree with the storage and handling of your data by this website. We Will Not Spam, Rent, or Sell Your Information.
As one of the worlds largest patent holders, Intel respects intellectual property. But we also respect truth, candor and fair competition. And we look forward to continuing to compete with Qualcomm.
Steven R. Rodgers is executive vice president and general counsel of Intel Corporation.
Intel and the Intel logo are trademarks of Intel Corporation in the United States and other countries.
Will Moss, 650-521-1754