Connect with us

Top Stories

HOW AI IS CHANGING HOW CUSTOMERS THINK ABOUT SAVINGS AND INVESTMENTS.

Published

on

HOW AI IS CHANGING HOW CUSTOMERS THINK ABOUT SAVINGS AND INVESTMENTS.

By Peter Ballard, Founder and Exec Director of Foolproof – www.foolproof.co.uk

Budgeting, saving for a rainy day and investing for the future are up there with doing the housework and grocery shopping for most people. It’s often considered dull, time-consuming and we all know we have bad habits which prevent us from reaching our goals when it comes to money. Not only is it considered a chore but, according to a report by PWC, only 24% of millennials demonstrate basic financial knowledge. In fact, a 2016 report by the OECD ranked the UK number 15 in the world for teaching financial literacy, despite a move in 2014 to make it mandatory in schools.

Automated financial services delivered through Robo-advisers, Apps and Chatbots is a potential game changer for how consumers approach everyday savings and investments.  It’s no secret that the banking industry has been slow to adapt to changing consumer behaviour and technological advances, but automation is an exciting development which could help consumers re-engage with their personal finances and give banks the opportunity to rekindle relationships with customers. 

Robo-advice and wealth management

There is much hype surrounding Robo-advice. It has been in the news off and on since 2008 with companies like Wealthfront, Betterment and Nutmeg, and has been gathering momentum over the last two years with high street banks like Barclays, RBS, Lloyds and Santander revealing plans to launch Robo-advisers.

Robo-advice is not a robot but an algorithm which uses information that the customer has provided to determine the most suitable investment options for them. It is hoped that Robo-advice could be the key to providing low-cost financial advice to the millions of people who are unable or unwilling to pay high fees. . However, it has been slow to get off the ground and whilst consumers are open to advice delivered this way, providers need to not only convince regulators but also consumers.

In 2016 Accenture reported that 68 per cent of UK consumers were prepared to use Robo-advice for banking services. During our own experience design research, we also found customers to be open to the idea of advice provided through a non-human interface. After all, we expect managing our money to be as easy and as hassle-free an experience as buying a book from Amazon. So surely a service like Robo-advice, with its instant access and speed of delivery, should be an attractive option for customers?

But whilst people may be open to the idea of automated advice, they appear less willing to pay for it believing it to be expensive. This is in part due to a lack of understanding of the value of traditional face-to-face advice and how much it costs, which makes it more difficult to make a direct comparison with Robo-advice.

Cost perceptions aren’t all to blame though. In our experience customers have also become wary of putting their trust into institutions such as banks and financial advisers. They fear that the advice they are given may be biased or incorrect and believe that financial advice is not for them but for ‘rich people’. Many believe their bank does not do enough to help them stay out of financial difficulty and worry that banks put their own interests before customers, profiting from encouraging overdrafts and short term loans.

Providers of these services will therefore need to educate consumers and regain their trust before being able to provide financial guidance this way. According to Andrew Craig, author of ‘How to Own the World’ and founder of Plain English Finance, where providers are currently failing is in their communication with customers. “They’re not speaking their language and don’t understand their needs. They assume that their readership understands investment and why they should be doing it. It’s not about income it’s about knowledge.”

The key to the adoption of robo-advice will be through helping people to first take control of their everyday spending. As people become more accustomed to using app-based services that help them take control of their everyday spending, when they have disposable income and begin thinking about savings and investments, it won’t be such a huge leap for them to put their trust in AI-driven wealth management services.

AI and changing everyday spending habits

Mobile is quickly becoming the heart of the banking relationship, giving customers the 24/7 service they crave. Whilst Robo-advice is helping people to engage with investing for the long-term, where automation is coming into its own is in helping people to form healthy day-to-day savings habits. Importantly, it’s equipping people with the tools to manage their money how and when they want. Research tells us that people want different approaches to advice with some wanting to be nagged and others wanting to be nudged or coached. With a variety of start-ups entering the market, there’s something for everyone.

Digit for example is a US savings account launched in 2015. Digit monitors your income and spending and then puts money away when you are least likely to notice it. What’s interesting about Digit is that it automatically figures out when and how much to save based on your lifestyle. Similarly, Plum – an AI-powered Facebook chatbot – monitors your balance and spending habits and deposits small amounts into a virtual savings pot. Cleo on the other-hand positions itself as an intelligent assistant which automates the ‘boring stuff’ such as categorising transactions, and provides actionable ways to save in real-time.

What these services do very well is communicate with customers little and often and provide personalised advice based on that person’s spending habits. What we see often during our research is that customers recognise they have bad habits, but breaking these requires outside influence. It’s not something that they generally find easy to do themselves. These AI powered services encourage customers to put away a little and often and ‘micro-wins’ provide positive reinforcement and can potentially lead to longer-term positive behavioural change.

Monzo for example uses data to help customers make better decisions about their money and to modify their spending habits over time. There’s nothing ground-breaking about their pre-paid product, but the experience they’ve created is frictionless and delivers relevant, valuable and practical information to customers. By making the information digestible, Monzo are helping consumers make smarter decisions about their spending. Other start-ups that we’ve worked with are exploring the detail of customer’s spending habits such as how much they spend on coffee or eating out. They can then provide appropriate decision-making prompts around whether they are going to go over budget or save money based on their spending.

What’s interesting is that these services appeal to a wide range of customers from those who have none or very little understanding of their spending through to those who like to take control of it. For customers who out of control this functionality helps them to spend less, but for people who have control they feel rewarded and even more in control.

In the past, invading customer consciousness to encourage them to make savings has been prohibitive for banks due to cost and logistics. AI gives banks the opportunity to deliver advice to customers in a timely and tailored manner. The challenge for banks however will be in convincing customers to use their services over start-ups and this will require rebuilding trust and loyalty. With the coming age of fragmentation – where bits of apps will appear within other services such as Facebook or WhatsApp – banks have the opportunity to employ AI agents to re-engage with customers by helping them form more constructive long-term habits around their money.

Top Stories

Spain’s jobless hit four million for first time in five years as pandemic curbs bite

Published

on

Spain's jobless hit four million for first time in five years as pandemic curbs bite 1

By Nathan Allen and Belén Carreño

MADRID (Reuters) – The number of jobless people in Spain rose above 4 million for the first time in five years in February, official data showed on Tuesday, as COVID-19 restrictions ravage the ailing economy.

Since the onset of the pandemic, Spain has lost more than 400,000 jobs, around two-thirds of them in the hospitality sector, which has struggled with limits on opening hours and capacity as well as an 80% slump in international tourism.

Jobless claims rose by 1.12% from a month earlier, or by 44,436 people to 4,008,789, Labour Ministry data showed, the fifth consecutive monthly increase in unemployment.

That number was 23.5% higher than in February 2020, the last month before the pandemic took hold in Spain.

“The rise in unemployment, caused by the third wave, is bad news, reflecting the structural flaws of the labour market that are accentuated by the pandemic,” Labour Minister Yolanda Diaz tweeted.

Restrictions vary sharply from region to region in Spain, with some shutting down all hospitality businesses, though Madrid has taken a particularly relaxed approach and kept bars and restaurants open.

A total of 30,211 positions were lost over the month, seasonally adjusted data from the Social Security Ministry showed. It was the first month more positions were closed than created since Spain emerged from its strict first-wave lockdown in May.

Still, the number of people supported by Spain’s ERTE furlough scheme across Spain fell by nearly 29,000 to 899,383 in February.

“These figures have remained more or less stable since September, indicating that the second and third waves of the pandemic have had a much smaller effect than the first in this regard,” the ministry said in a statement.

Hotels, bars and restaurants and air travel are the sectors with the highest proportion of furloughed workers, it added.

Tourism dependent regions like the Canary and Balearic Islands have been particularly hard hit, with the workforce contracting by more than 6% since last February in both archipelagos.

The last time the number of jobless in Spain hit 4 million was in April 2016.

(Reporting by Anita Kobylinska, Nathan Allen and Belén Carreño, Editing by Inti Landauro, Kirsten Donovan and Philippa Fletcher)

Continue Reading

Top Stories

Pandemic ‘shecession’ reverses women’s workplace gains

Published

on

Pandemic 'shecession' reverses women's workplace gains 2

By Anuradha Nagaraj

(Thomson Reuters Foundation) – The coronavirus pandemic reversed women’s workplace gains in many of the world’s wealthiest countries as the burden of childcare rose and female-dominated sectors shed jobs, according to research released on Tuesday.

Women were more likely than men to lose their jobs in 17 of the 24 rich countries where unemployment rose last year, according to the latest annual PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) Women in Work Index.

Jobs in female-dominated sectors like marketing and communications were more likely to be lost than roles in finance, which are more likely to be held by men, said the report, calling the slowdown a “shecession”.

Meanwhile, women were spending on average 7.7 more hours a week than men on unpaid childcare, a “second shift” that is nearly the equivalent of a full-time job and risks forcing some out of paid work altogether, it found.

“Although jobs will return when economies bounce back, they will not necessarily be the same jobs,” said Larice Stielow, senior economist at PwC.

“If we don’t have policies in place to directly address the unequal burden of care, and to enable more women to enter jobs in growing sectors of the economy, women will return to fewer hours, lower-skilled, and lower paid jobs.”

The report, which looked at 33 countries in the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) club of rich nations, said progress towards gender equality at work would not begin to recover until 2022.

Even then, the pace of progress would need to double if rich countries were to make up the losses by 2030, it said, calling on governments and businesses to improve access to growth sectors such as artificial intelligence and renewable energy.

Laura Hinton, chief people officer at PwC, said it was “paramount that gender pay gap reporting is prioritised, with targeted action plans put in place as businesses focus on building back better and fairer”.

Britain has required employers with more than 250 staff to submit gender pay gap figures every year since 2017 in a bid to reduce pay disparities, but last year it suspended the requirement due to the coronavirus pandemic.

(Reporting by Anuradha Nagaraj @AnuraNagaraj; Editing by Claire Cozens. Please credit the Thomson Reuters Foundation, the charitable arm of Thomson Reuters, that covers the lives of people around the world who struggle to live freely or fairly. Visit http://news.trust.org)

Continue Reading

Top Stories

German January exports to UK fell 30% year-on-year as Brexit hit – Stats Office

Published

on

German January exports to UK fell 30% year-on-year as Brexit hit - Stats Office 3

BERLIN (Reuters) – German exports to the United Kingdom fell by 30% year-on-year in January “due to Brexit effects”, preliminary trade figures released by the Federal Statistics Office on Tuesday showed.

In 2020, German exports to the UK fell by 15.5% compared to 2019, recording the biggest year-on-year decline since the financial and economic crisis in 2009, when they fell by 17.0%, the Office said.

“Since 2016 – the year of the Brexit referendum – German exports to the UK have steadily declined,” the Office said in a statement.

In 2015 German exports to the UK amounted to 89.0 billion euros. In 2020, German they totalled 66.9 billion euros.

Imports to Germany from the UK totalled 34.7 billion euros in 2020, down 9.6 % compared to 2019.

(Reporting by Paul Carrel; Editing by Madeline Chambers)

Continue Reading
Editorial & Advertiser disclosureOur website provides you with information, news, press releases, Opinion and advertorials on various financial products and services. This is not to be considered as financial advice and should be considered only for information purposes. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any information provided with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek Professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. We link to various third party websites, affiliate sales networks, and may link to our advertising partners websites. Though we are tied up with various advertising and affiliate networks, this does not affect our analysis or opinion. When you view or click on certain links available on our articles, our partners may compensate us for displaying the content to you, or make a purchase or fill a form. This will not incur any additional charges to you. To make things simpler for you to identity or distinguish sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles or links hosted on our site as a partner endorsed link.

Call For Entries

Global Banking and Finance Review Awards Nominations 2021
2021 Awards now open. Click Here to Nominate

Latest Articles

Newsletters with Secrets & Analysis. Subscribe Now