Search
00
GBAF Logo
trophy
Top StoriesInterviewsBusinessFinanceBankingTechnologyInvestingTradingVideosAwardsMagazinesHeadlinesTrends

Subscribe to our newsletter

Get the latest news and updates from our team.

Global Banking & Finance Review®

Global Banking & Finance Review® - Subscribe to our newsletter

Company

    GBAF Logo
    • About Us
    • Advertising and Sponsorship
    • Profile & Readership
    • Contact Us
    • Latest News
    • Privacy & Cookies Policies
    • Terms of Use
    • Advertising Terms
    • Issue 81
    • Issue 80
    • Issue 79
    • Issue 78
    • Issue 77
    • Issue 76
    • Issue 75
    • Issue 74
    • Issue 73
    • Issue 72
    • Issue 71
    • Issue 70
    • View All
    • About the Awards
    • Awards Timetable
    • Awards Winners
    • Submit Nominations
    • Testimonials
    • Media Room
    • FAQ
    • Asset Management Awards
    • Brand of the Year Awards
    • Business Awards
    • Cash Management Banking Awards
    • Banking Technology Awards
    • CEO Awards
    • Customer Service Awards
    • CSR Awards
    • Deal of the Year Awards
    • Corporate Governance Awards
    • Corporate Banking Awards
    • Digital Transformation Awards
    • Fintech Awards
    • Education & Training Awards
    • ESG & Sustainability Awards
    • ESG Awards
    • Forex Banking Awards
    • Innovation Awards
    • Insurance & Takaful Awards
    • Investment Banking Awards
    • Investor Relations Awards
    • Leadership Awards
    • Islamic Banking Awards
    • Real Estate Awards
    • Project Finance Awards
    • Process & Product Awards
    • Telecommunication Awards
    • HR & Recruitment Awards
    • Trade Finance Awards
    • The Next 100 Global Awards
    • Wealth Management Awards
    • Travel Awards
    • Years of Excellence Awards
    • Publishing Principles
    • Ownership & Funding
    • Corrections Policy
    • Editorial Code of Ethics
    • Diversity & Inclusion Policy
    • Fact Checking Policy
    Original content: Global Banking and Finance Review - https://www.globalbankingandfinance.com

    A global financial intelligence and recognition platform delivering authoritative insights, data-driven analysis, and institutional benchmarking across Banking, Capital Markets, Investment, Technology, and Financial Infrastructure.

    Copyright © 2010-2026 - All Rights Reserved. | Sitemap | Tags

    Editorial & Advertiser disclosure

    Global Banking & Finance Review® is an online platform offering news, analysis, and opinion on the latest trends, developments, and innovations in the banking and finance industry worldwide. The platform covers a diverse range of topics, including banking, insurance, investment, wealth management, fintech, and regulatory issues. The website publishes news, press releases, opinion and advertorials on various financial organizations, products and services which are commissioned from various Companies, Organizations, PR agencies, Bloggers etc. These commissioned articles are commercial in nature. This is not to be considered as financial advice and should be considered only for information purposes. It does not reflect the views or opinion of our website and is not to be considered an endorsement or a recommendation. We cannot guarantee the accuracy or applicability of any information provided with respect to your individual or personal circumstances. Please seek Professional advice from a qualified professional before making any financial decisions. We link to various third-party websites, affiliate sales networks, and to our advertising partners websites. When you view or click on certain links available on our articles, our partners may compensate us for displaying the content to you or make a purchase or fill a form. This will not incur any additional charges to you. To make things simpler for you to identity or distinguish advertised or sponsored articles or links, you may consider all articles or links hosted on our site as a commercial article placement. We will not be responsible for any loss you may suffer as a result of any omission or inaccuracy on the website.

    1. Home
    2. >Business
    3. >EMPLOYERS HOLDING BACK ON GENDER PAY GAP REPORTING, XPERTHR RESEARCH SUGGESTS
    Business

    Employers Holding Back on Gender Pay Gap Reporting, Xperthr Research Suggests

    Published by Gbaf News

    Posted on November 29, 2017

    7 min read

    Last updated: January 21, 2026

    Add as preferred source on Google
    Image depicting investors assessing the impact of drought on companies and exploring water management solutions. This relates to the article's discussion on the financial implications of water scarcity.
    Investors analyzing water scarcity impacts on companies - Global Banking & Finance Review
    Why waste money on news and opinion when you can access them for free?

    Take advantage of our newsletter subscription and stay informed on the go!

    Subscribe

    • Survey shows most have already calculated their pay gap but not yet reported
    • Anecdotal evidence suggests fear of standing out if they publish early
    • Actual pay gap little surprise to most HR professionals

    Employers look set to leave publication of their gender pay gap reports until the very last minute rather than stand out by publishing data ahead of their competitors, XpertHR research suggests.

    Organisations with 250 or more employees have to publish their gender pay and bonus gaps by April 2018 in order to comply with Regulations that came into effect this year. However, with less than six months to go, only 6% of the estimated 4,000 employers covered by the new law have complied.

    Anecdotally, some have told XpertHR researchers that they are waiting to see what other companies in their sector do before publishing – or that they want there to be a large number of reports in the public domain before they release their own figures.

    A survey published today by XpertHR of 128 companies in the private sector reveals that despite the low reporting rate to date, more than one in four (26.5%) mid-sized companies (those with 250-999 employees) and more than half (51.5% ) of larger companies (with 1,000+ employees) have already calculated their pay gaps but without yet making them public.

    The survey found that 28.1% of mid-sized companies and 20.6% of larger companies had not yet carried out any calculations. Just 3.1% and 1.5% respectively had already reported. Almost all the rest had calculated their pay gaps either informally or formally but had not yet reported.

    Among those that had carried out the calculations, the results rarely came as a surprise. Nearly seven out of 10 (69.8%) said their pay gap was in line with expectations, with most saying that they had calculated the figures before.

    Employers reported a similar lack of surprise at the extent of their gender bonus gaps – which are typically far wider than pay gaps.

    Asked what they would do as a result of calculating and reporting their gender pay gaps, organisations were most likely to:

    • Conduct further analysis (65.6%);
    • Develop an action plan to close the gap (45.8%);
    • Review recruitment processes (27.1%);
    • Review promotion processes (21.9%); and
    • Review pay levels for men and women (17.7%).

    Just one in six (16.7%) said that having calculated and reported their gender pay gap, they were likely to take no further action.

    Commenting on the findings, XpertHR content director Mark Crail said:

    “Six months in, not only have tiny numbers of employers reported their gender pay gaps so far, but those that have done so have had pay gaps that were narrower than the national average. It now appears that many organisations, especially those with substantial pay gaps, are holding back from publishing their reports rather than wanting to draw attention to themselves by going early.

    “Having looked at the reports that have been published so far, it is obvious that some, despite the best efforts of those concerned, do not entirely comply with the legislation. Rather than leaving it until the last minute, employers should now be ensuring that their data is accurate, the calculations are in line with the legislation and that all the reporting requirements can be met.

    “Our data suggests that there will be a late surge of published data towards next April as the deadline approaches. HR departments should use the next few months wisely to really understand their own organisation’s gender pay gap and to develop a clear message to employees and the outside world about why it exists and what they are going to do about it.”

    • Survey shows most have already calculated their pay gap but not yet reported
    • Anecdotal evidence suggests fear of standing out if they publish early
    • Actual pay gap little surprise to most HR professionals

    Employers look set to leave publication of their gender pay gap reports until the very last minute rather than stand out by publishing data ahead of their competitors, XpertHR research suggests.

    Organisations with 250 or more employees have to publish their gender pay and bonus gaps by April 2018 in order to comply with Regulations that came into effect this year. However, with less than six months to go, only 6% of the estimated 4,000 employers covered by the new law have complied.

    Anecdotally, some have told XpertHR researchers that they are waiting to see what other companies in their sector do before publishing – or that they want there to be a large number of reports in the public domain before they release their own figures.

    A survey published today by XpertHR of 128 companies in the private sector reveals that despite the low reporting rate to date, more than one in four (26.5%) mid-sized companies (those with 250-999 employees) and more than half (51.5% ) of larger companies (with 1,000+ employees) have already calculated their pay gaps but without yet making them public.

    The survey found that 28.1% of mid-sized companies and 20.6% of larger companies had not yet carried out any calculations. Just 3.1% and 1.5% respectively had already reported. Almost all the rest had calculated their pay gaps either informally or formally but had not yet reported.

    Among those that had carried out the calculations, the results rarely came as a surprise. Nearly seven out of 10 (69.8%) said their pay gap was in line with expectations, with most saying that they had calculated the figures before.

    Employers reported a similar lack of surprise at the extent of their gender bonus gaps – which are typically far wider than pay gaps.

    Asked what they would do as a result of calculating and reporting their gender pay gaps, organisations were most likely to:

    • Conduct further analysis (65.6%);
    • Develop an action plan to close the gap (45.8%);
    • Review recruitment processes (27.1%);
    • Review promotion processes (21.9%); and
    • Review pay levels for men and women (17.7%).

    Just one in six (16.7%) said that having calculated and reported their gender pay gap, they were likely to take no further action.

    Commenting on the findings, XpertHR content director Mark Crail said:

    “Six months in, not only have tiny numbers of employers reported their gender pay gaps so far, but those that have done so have had pay gaps that were narrower than the national average. It now appears that many organisations, especially those with substantial pay gaps, are holding back from publishing their reports rather than wanting to draw attention to themselves by going early.

    “Having looked at the reports that have been published so far, it is obvious that some, despite the best efforts of those concerned, do not entirely comply with the legislation. Rather than leaving it until the last minute, employers should now be ensuring that their data is accurate, the calculations are in line with the legislation and that all the reporting requirements can be met.

    “Our data suggests that there will be a late surge of published data towards next April as the deadline approaches. HR departments should use the next few months wisely to really understand their own organisation’s gender pay gap and to develop a clear message to employees and the outside world about why it exists and what they are going to do about it.”

    More from Business

    Explore more articles in the Business category

    Image for Submit Your Entry for Years of Excellence Awards 2026
    Submit Your Entry for Years of Excellence Awards 2026
    Image for Nominations Open for Travel & Hospitality Awards 2026
    Nominations Open for Travel & Hospitality Awards 2026
    Image for Submit Your Entry Today for Telecom Awards 2026
    Submit Your Entry Today for Telecom Awards 2026
    Image for Submit Your Entries for The Next 100 Global Awards 2026
    Submit Your Entries for the Next 100 Global Awards 2026
    Image for Submit Your Entry: Public Sector & Governance Excellence Awards 2026
    Submit Your Entry: Public Sector & Governance Excellence Awards 2026
    Image for Nominations Invited for Real Estate Development Awards 2026
    Nominations Invited for Real Estate Development Awards 2026
    Image for Submit Your Entry: Process & Product Awards 2026
    Submit Your Entry: Process & Product Awards 2026
    Image for Call for Entries: HR & Recruitment Awards 2026
    Call for Entries: HR & Recruitment Awards 2026
    Image for Submit Your Nominations Today for Education & Training Awards 2026
    Submit Your Nominations Today for Education & Training Awards 2026
    Image for Join the Corporate Governance Awards 2026: Showcase Your Organisation’s Leadership
    Join the Corporate Governance Awards 2026: Showcase Your Organisation’s Leadership
    Image for Submit Your Entry Today for Business Awards 2026
    Submit Your Entry Today for Business Awards 2026
    Image for Decentralized Masters’ ‘family culture’ building trust instead of hierarchy
    Decentralized Masters’ ‘family Culture’ Building Trust Instead of Hierarchy
    View All Business Posts
    Previous Business PostBusiness Growth and Regulation Increases Advisers’ Working Week
    Next Business PostCFO Survey – Companies Pursuing Expansive Agenda